BUY A SHIRT!
The ED TShirt Shop is open for business! Use discount code ED2009 for 10% off! Click here to shop. ED5 Pollfest is going on now! Register a forums accounts and help us find the best article in the five year history of Encyclopedia Dramatica. For today's poll, go here! Thanks to Kale for donating $666, and he wants to remind you all to nevar forget dem towers in New York.

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

See main article at: Wikipedia Articles for deletion/Encyclopedia Dramatica

• KEEP!!! If you delete this article you don't support the troops.
• KEEP!!! but make it better... --Hipufiamiumi 19:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• strong delete Does not use the word erogonus enough --darksteel 01:09, 29 May 1909 (UTC)
• Keep Records of TOW faggotry need to be maintained --Deliboy 01:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
• Keep TOW is a must on this site, however may need a fair bit of editing for moar lulz. Infinite 12:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
• Keep TOW is noteworthy enough for its own article. But the article itself needs a rewrite and more drama.Livingthing
• GIGA ULTRA SUPER EXTRAVAGANZA BONANZA MULTIKILL KEEP. It's goddamn funny. And we need sum good shit on TOW.
• Keep. I find it very luzly, and for all those that says it needs deletion, I say try and make it even moar luzly, you fucking faggots.

Sincerely yours in the service of the almight Raptor Jesus/Lulz/HAPPY NIGGER,

-Kaiwren107

Wikipedia claims to be "a free-content encyclopedia that anyone can edit." Absurd mob rule. Lulz score = 1/20. The only lulz consist of the absurdity of the concept and the pettiness of its members - sort of metalulz. The discussion so far (from Wikipedia and Talk:Wikipedia with clarifying Delete and Keep votes inserted): —Aussieintn 00:37, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Move to HAGGER???????????????????????????????????????? Myveryownsock 01:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. I agree with MrP: add some lulz and it will become good --Captain Tripps 21:24, 8 March 2008 (CST)
• Strong delete as there are not viable sources nor is it relevant to anyone. If we got some neutral WP:Sources in here then maybe we could keep, but until then I propose a delete and lock to prevent vandals from re-creating it. Kakama 18:22, 5 February 2008 (CST)
• KEEP THIS ARTICLE IS NEEDED. 1,2,3,4, I DECLARE AN EDIT WAR!!!Netwarrior 07:47, 23 January 2008 (CST)

• Keep. Keep the article it speaks so much of the truth -- Anal Levy
• Keep. Keep it, add some lulz and it will become good -- MrP
  • Ditto that. needs moar vandalism tips and lulzy results of same - Csue
• Delete. This article is crap.
• Delete. From page: This entry should be deleted. Not 'dramatica' enough. -- Anonymous
• Delete. This entry should be deleted. Not 'dramatica' enough. --33mhz 12:03, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT)
• Delete. I agree and propose Wikipedia for deletion. --Aussieintn 00:14, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. As much as I'd love to see the IRL Wikipedia disappear, I think the entry is relevant, if only because some people might now be familiar with the source of the site design and source code. --Q\D 00:21, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • I respectfully suggest that the above comment misses the point. --Aussieintn 00:24, 2 Mar 2005 (UT
• Qualified keep - keep but add section on using Wikipedia as drama-generating technique. --Q\D 00:59, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • IAWTC Oopsz 23:22, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Fukken signed. Chao Tipper 10:14, 20 August 2007 (CDT)
• Gays - I ate a donut. --無 02:17, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete with extreme prejudice. This was deleted once by some fucktard with an agenda, so it obviously shouldn't be here again, even though it's a different article. Er. --Badlydrawnjeff 02:23, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • but wikipedia produces 20,000,000 search results. --Lucky Pierre QD 06:43, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE! I DON'T CARE! I don't like it and here's the misconstrued, undefinable and obscure policy to prove that it must be deleted now: Link PS. Gimme OPS.
• cheesegod - what brought this on? --kh/ what 21:36, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • sleep. They have the ED article there up for Speedy Deletion, though I dunno if that is the reason its up for deletion here. Their reasons suck though for deleting ED off Wikipedia.--Azathar 19:03, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • This discussion originated in the article and the article's discussion page. The first two votes, by Anonymous and 33mhz, were moved here so that the discussion could be clarified and formalized. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 19:18, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Shameless promotion by stirring controversy. I strongly suspect that user:Girlvinyl is a sockpuppet of Jimbo Whales. Wikimoki 19:13, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• The result of the discussion was keep. Does that mean it's safe to make a mikkilai article now? --Badlydrawnjeff 12:05, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • I'm already making a bureaucratic fucks article. However, I should note that Bureaucratic is one of the hardest words for me to spell, but yeah. Dr. Park N. Stones
• Speedy delete. p.s. new rule, everyone is allowed to vote twice. --Lucky Pierre QD 15:08, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• randomize i'm voting again since dan said i could. --kh/ what 12:31, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment after playing in the sandbox: we can actually redirect this to wikipedia:Special:Randompage to send our Wikipedia article to a random Wikipedia page. However, this might not be funny. --Lucky Pierre QD 15:17, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Unfunny/Confusing. Also, I'm thinking we might want a seires on Wikipedia or "Wikis Suck" or something.
    • i just meant to scramble all the words in the article and see if we get shakespeare or crap. probably crap but aussie can make that work. --kh/ what 16:50, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The current Wikipedia article clearly violates the 8th guideline of this official-looking document, as it falls outside of the scope of all these other legal documents. Therefore, we cannot have such an article on Encyclopædia Dramatica, or we could find ourselves victims of a grave habeas corpus subpoena which could lead to an even more serious injunction. Personally, I find it appalling that some people are defending this article, as denying its immediate takedown will threaten the whole Encyclopædia Dramatica project. ~Jumbo Whales III 20:40, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Needs more cowbell Gerbilsage 22:15, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Note: User only has cheese-filled and crappy edits, all in other articles.
• Dialate, my second choice.--Azathar 01:44, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, It could use more lulz, but I'm always for promoting more completeness on this website. --E richard 12:38, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No furries. --Majic 00:29, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• Balete. Because baleteing is, like, more !!!extreme!!!
• Delete. It lacks pr0n.-TDK 09:19, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Because bashing wikipedia is a worthy cause no matter who you are!-ThunderClaw 12:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I'm on your deletion page, leeching off ThunderClaw's reason. Kvn8907 20:21, 16 November 2007 (CST)
• Abstain. As a [almost definately] banned Wikipedia user, I cannot approach this topic with a NPOV. --Blu Aardvark 08:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Pizza. I think we all need to get some pizza and watch some pr0n-Ket 08:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Pizza. I second that motion because I am hungry and horny. --Einsidler 08:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• KEEP. Needs moar unserious fucking business, though --Nobody Knows 2 18:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain I abstain. --Sheneequa 08:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Peaches Mmmmm... I could go for some peaches and cool whip right now, man. ۩ 14:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Dog Meat- It's the secret ingredient!--Quit your whining 18:49, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Vote-I vote-Ket ^Refill/lol 23:22, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • It’s not a vote, it’s a discussion; As per WP:AFD ~ CATS 09:00, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• mega keep - key for the lulz and hissy fits over there. Fuck the nazi admins, keep the lulz alive. MONGO would want no less. Fuckface 17:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - If we delete this article, then the terrorists will have won. --Teh internets are teh awesome 19:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• FALSE Also, AfD = Habbo. Tfo 19:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Rip it to shreads Am I allowed to vote twice?--Azathar 03:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Unreliable, editors are anonymous and most of the admin are sexual deviants to only promote pedophillia information. It is also owned by a well known sexual pervert Jimbo who has a long history of porno connections and stock fraud. --Selina Is Mah Bitch 03:17, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Explained better.... How can you Lulz the wikipedia article more? Already the media and almost all schools/Uni's regard WP as a joke and even fail students if they source WP. Just the word wikipedia screams Lulz. --Selina Is Mah Bitch 03:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• UPDATE: NETSCOTT IS A FAGGOT
  • User:Miltopia is a fucking n00b idiot who should just have his idiot ass banned again. Netscott 09:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• My head hurts. Maybe I should stop punching it.--WKD 08:46, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete – Salt the earth, rape their dead mouths ~ CATS 08:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• "Delete' - Because they hurt my feelings and I'm an admin MONGO 17:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Know thine enemy. CAF51 03:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - This article contains original research, does not cite its sources, and is non-notable. --Blargh 04:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - but reduce the boring shit that comprises most of the article. Cut everything before "What is a Wiki?", and cut "Hivemind", "What Wikipedia Is Not", and "Jimbo Wales Nobel Prize". Or if you're going to delete the whole thing, at least leave the kangaroo picture, which is really all that you need. --Spacey
• Web - how do i shot it? --Anonylol 23:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Yo home to Bel-Air! - I pulled up to the house about 7 or 8, and I yelled to the cabby yo holmes smell ya later, looked at my kingdom I was finally there, to sit on my throne as the prince of Bel-Air.    JailBait    talk    contribs   23:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete with huge extreme prejudice per CSD G1 and G10. Patent nonsense and exists solely as an attack page to disparage its subject. Delete! Delete! OK! OK! - Wikislayer 02:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep because bad people want to delete it. Dr. Whiggs 19:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Karma. --Lateral 01:44, 13 July 2007 (CDT)
• Keep Major source of internet drama. Also because I am a fag. --Parsleymagnet 21:49, 26 July 2007 (CDT)
• Strong Delete and Merge Dr. Fuzzykins 21:59, 26 July 2007 (CDT)
  • But that violates the GFDL!!! kekeke 111 ~~~~ ( ! | ?| * ) 00:21, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
• Doubleplusstrong delete, merge, lock and kill with fire Random asshole douchebag debate team faggot terms here.Plinko Commie 13:24, 27 July 2007 (CDT)
• jewsdidwtc Speaks for itself.--Kirbytime 07:21, 28 July 2007 (CDT)
• Keep it's pretty lulz worthy, I think it should be kept, plus if we get rid of it, WikiPedia wins in its nazi spread of teh anti-lulz... --S1lentGFX 14:19, 28 July 2007 (CDT)
• Keep Poke it's eyes out and skull fuck it. Slowly at first, then faster and faster. Seriously. Can I say that here? Peter Tork 20:52, 31 July 2007 (CDT)
  • No that is trolling!!! Rescind your vote or I will ban you. Tony Sidaway 20:55, 31 July 2007 (CDT)
• Keep Its okay...and there are much worse articles around... -- StormTheTroll 16:03, 1 August 2007 (CDT)
  • Your comment violates WP:JEW and WP:FUR Plinko Commie 12:19, 2 August 2007 (CDT)
• Delete I know they say lots of people visit Wikipedia, but under WP:BIGNUMBER that's not really enough of a justification to have an article. --ShellandraSelune 00:12, 8 August 2007 (CDT)
• Delete - vanity and trademark violation. Intrawebz 11:06, 16 August 2007 (CDT)
• Weak Keep In spite of Wikiepdia being a crutch for social retards, it generates masses of lulzworthy moments. Plus what S1lentGFX said. Avatar 16:24, 18 August 2007 (CDT)
• DELETE THIS MUTHA FUCKA Toxicity² 17:53, 18 August 2007 (CDT)
• Weak Keep It's only partially lulzworthy but it's worth knowing how to best screw with it. Klosterdev 01:26, 11 September 2007 (CDT)
• STRONG DELETE - RIP AND TEAR LULZ --Nakamura 18:25, 17 September 2007 (CDT)
• I made you a vote, but i eated it Ninja 22:41, 18 September 2007 (CDT)
• Keap, but unfuck it up. FatHo 09:58, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
• STRONG LIEK OF MUDKIPS --OldDirtyMudkips 12:57, 22 September 2007 (CDT)
• Weak Abstain. Asforoneday 09:22, 12 October 2007 (CDT)
  • Hyper Pablo --TEMOLIC 06:56, 5 November 2007 (CST)
• riverrun, past Eve and Adam's, from swerve of shore to bend of bay, brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.
  　　　Sir Tristram, violer d'amores, fr'over the short sea, had passencore rearrived from North Armorica on this side the scraggy isthmus of Europe Minor to wielderfight his penisolate war: nor had topsawyer's rocks by the stream Oconee exaggerated themselse to Laurens County's gorgios while they went doublin their mumper all the time: nor avoice from afire bellowsed mishe mishe to tauftauf thuartpeatrick: not yet, though venissoon after, had a kidscad buttended a bland old isaac: not yet, though all's fair in vanessy, were sosie sesthers wroth with twone nathandjoe. Rot a peck of pa's malt had Jhem or Shen brewed by arclight and rory end to the regginbrow was to be seen ringsome on the aquaface.
  　　　The fall (bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntonnerronntuonnthunntrovarrhounawnskawntoohoohoordenenthurnuk!) of a once wallstrait oldparr is retaled early in bed and later on life down through all christian minstrelsy. The great fall of the offwall entailed at such short notice the pftjschute of Finnegan, erse solid man, that the humptyhillhead of humself prumptly sends an unquiring one well to the west in quest of his tumptytumtoes: and their upturnpikepointandplace is at the knock out in the park 22 where oranges have been laid to rust upon the green since devlinsfirst loved livvy. -Push Butan 18:09, 7 November 2007 (CST)
• keep no, wait... delete. - Serious Cat 16:20, 15 November 2007 (CST)
• Fap. I'm a nerd. Rickyrab 20:54, 17 November 2007 (CST)
• Delete. Delete the Faggotry! DC--Jfyiadch 23:04, 18 November 2007 (CST)
• Keep As much as I hate Wikishitia, if we add some more lulz, it's going to be just fine, k? thx.Lulzdigger 04:24, 25 November 2007 (CST)
• Point of parliamentary procedure. I suck cocks. Yangus 11:02, 3 December 2007 (CST)
• Delete and make Jimbo Wales choke on the penis of every gay man in the world.--ByAppointmentTo 15:22, 3 December 2007 (CST)
• Stop Hammertime. - Tablecloth 16:20, 11 September 1001(CST)
• Keep. it's internets relevant, and there's enough shit about wikipedia that can generate lulz... Reaper Man 22:36, 6 December 2007 (CST)
• Disregard That, I suck cocks. Reaper Man 22:37, 6 December 2007 (CST)
• Keep fdsdfs --Impulse 14:24, 1 January 2008 (CST)
• Needs moar tubgirl
  

  
  --Roofus 01:36, 18 January 2008 (CST)
• Keep Everyday RL drama in that site is enough reason to keep it here. -- Merienda 01:43, 18 January 2008 (CST)
• KEEP If it's deleted we'll have a bunch or red links and the whole series on wikipedia will be screwed up and make no sense. Plus the page is gigantic.Fade5 10:35, 29 February 2008 (CST)
• Keep Just mark it as a shit and rewrite the damn thing instead of deleting it outright. Turbine2k5 10:52, 21 March 2008 (CDT)
• FUCKING KEEP Agree with Fade5, we'd have a fuckton of red links and a major part of the internet (WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT) without a page. ED is about lulz and the internet. Wikipedia is the anti-lulz, a less revered but still notable kind of lulz. Don't vote delete just because you're butthurt our article on wikipedia was deleted but Uncyclopedia's was kept. --Grammer 22:40, 2 May 2008 (CDT)
  • User has only three namespace edits before this vote. --Lolinnernets 20:19, 14 July 2008 (CDT)
• KEEP DESU~ The site has tons of drama. I mean, look at the drama that was ccaused because of their ED page. Definitely keep, we need moar drama.
  • User has only three namespace edits before this vote. --Lolinnernets 20:19, 14 July 2008 (CDT)
• Delete Encyclopedia Dramatica is not for something you made up in linux conference one day --Lolinnernets 20:19, 14 July 2008 (CDT)
• OBJECTION!!! --Phoenix Wright 21:48, 11 August 2008 (CDT)

• OVERRULED! --Judge Lolington 21:49, 11 August 2008 (CDT)

• SHUT UP JUDGE!!!111 --Duke Otterland 21:50, 11 August 2008 (CDT)

• LOL WUT? --LOL WUT PEAR 20:47, 11 August 2008 (CDT)
• Keep! Or fap. Whichever. --HtebeizziZ 15:22, 14 September 2008 (CDT)
• Keep We NEED a freaking wikipedo article. I think it just needs a re-write. Twigletpies 11:31, 15 September 2008 (CDT)
  • I respectfully suggest the above comment misses the point. --ℒℴℓinnℯrnℯts^☽

☎ 11:48, 15 September 2008 (CDT)

• 16-year-old girl Wikipedia needs some. --Keynote 01:49, 18 September 2008 (CDT)

KEEP:

Really need to keep this shit. It shows that WE are better than that bullshit, i.e. horseshit. Besides, some vandal from wikipedia may see this and have Encyclopedia Dramatica deleted just for lulz. Agent Man 02:04, 18 September 2008 (CDT)

Comment:Fixed a error. Agent Man 02:06, 18 September 2008 (CDT)

• Speedy keep It clearly exists, nothing else matters. Ἐ 17:22, 19 September 2008 (CDT)
• Delete per nom (I've been waiting for a while to make that joke, lawl.)--The Internet is a joke. 07:39, 22 September 2008 (CDT)

• REWRITE Needs to be re written from the ground up... CherryOs12 15:12, 22 September 2008 (CDT)

• Wow you fucks are real idiots, ugh 1)how can you not realize this is a joke when the nomination is from 2005? and 2) some votes were under the category. --ℒℴℓinnℯrnℯts^☽

☎ 02:22, 23 September 2008 (CDT)

• Delete Wikipedia is not notable Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 10:21, 29 September 2008 (CDT)

• Merge with Faggotry This subject is not Notable enough for an ED article
• Keep: As in DELETE FUCKING EVERYTHING. Not really, but yeah. --Oppdis 17:17, 5 October 2008 (CDT)
• Duck. Spoom 18:17, 11 October 2008 (CDT)
• Keep, end of story My ruling is final, keep the shit on and make it even more shittier. --Idunnowhattoput 03:42, 19 October 2008 (CDT)
• KEEP THIS SHIT. Its GREAT toilet paper. Secret Agent Man 15:54, 16 January 2009 (CST)
• Speedy Delete, then revert, then an edit war ending in 15 infinite blocks - Sounds about right. That Thing There 15:06, 17 January 2009 (CST)
• Divide By Zero FTW -Dysrythmia 06:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. the moar u kno id_ram
• FUKKEN KEEP! --Stumbles 20:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Why get rid of it? Keep, keep! --FastHedgeHawg 7:31 PM, February 25 2009
• Keep I don't see any reason to get rid of it. If it makes at least one person laugh, then it is worth keeping, I say! zekthegreat 12:44, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
• Keep I don't get why u guise would delete teh 'pedia artikel Fucking Dramatik 00:36, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
• Yiff I abstain. --Blu Aardvark 17:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
• Keep but add more lulz, drama and pron. --Atleast100 _{(spam the talk page)} 02:03, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
• Keep Needs Rule 34 tho! Thewarondrugslost 02:23, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
• Boobs are fun to play with. Qwertyk 04:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
• Keep: Our we might loose the million year battle for Earth. - Flyinpigfetus ^Message 04:30, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
• Soft Abstain SlimWhitman 04:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
• Keep: The people need to know the truth of TOW's faggotry. Nam Macs 07:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
• Fuck yeah keep: Agree with the latter. Fuck their anal ways, the world needs to know. Whoever keeps trying to nominate it for deletion is a bitter Wikipedophile anyway. YouCallThatABagel 05:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
• Redirect to HAGGER????????????????????. Serial Masturbator 23:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• Hey Guys What's going on in here?
  _Page^Chat_Contribs 23:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
• KEEP. Produces lulz Metalliman 11:04, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• I'm 12 years old and what is this? --Bannedguy 18:50, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
• keep - i haven't read it --mv 14:30, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
• Kill it with fire I googled it for five seconds and I didn't find any RS for it. --Enric Naval 22:14, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
• Supprimer Pas de notoriété. Je n'ai jamais entendu de cette site web. J'ai essayé à créer un article de ma bite, mais quelqu'un l'a supprimé. - Bubbles1844 06:30, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
• MASSIVE DAMAGE Remove in the most barbaric, dramatic way possible. -- nipple 15:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
• BOOM, HEADSHOT! I told you to duck. Spoom 23:41, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. Although it needs more drama that isn't TL;DR. QQ 02:23, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. A potentially lulzy article. Guess Who!? It's Willidarski! 21:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)