BUY A SHIRT!
The ED TShirt Shop is open for business! Use discount code ED2009 for 10% off! Click here to shop.
ED5 Pollfest is going on now! Register a forums accounts and help us find the best article in the five year history of Encyclopedia Dramatica. Check out the three polls running today: [1] [2] [3]



Encyclopedia Dramatica talk:Vandalism is Pointless

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Jump to: navigation, search

This should be ED policy/guideline-Ket Refill/lol 06:05, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

  • SHit, this is useless. Miltopia 04:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)


Need to work this in [1]. Ritegroic 13:55, 16 July 2007 (CDT)

Contents

Why is is it pointless?

If someone makes an embarrassing typo in they're/their/there article, is is it considered vandalism to correct the lulzworthy mistake? Also lolololol someone fix grammar in locked article plox! Saint sithney 01:11, 17 July 2007 (CDT)

PLANKING IN BROGRESS

Yeah, I'm pretty much just putting this here for the lulz.

Also to make recent-change-fags shit bricks.

that other wiki

that other wiki that you recomend to vandalize ,damn...i just messeged the link to a friend (foreign person) while he was on a internet cafe listening to music... he tried to close the page at the speed of a tunder, the computer froze...the rest is history. lol he got banned for ever from that place

  • Something tells me you aren't friends anymore... --Blu Aardvark 15:25, 19 November 2007 (CST)

Something that should be added

It should be noted that now that we have SecurityBot on patrol, so vandalism is likely to be reverted in an instant. HedgeJew 14:36, 22 April 2008 (CDT)

Link to LM WIki leads to a trojan

Someone remove the final link please. A virus is not all that funny. --Da Wonderer 07:14, 29 May 2008 (CDT)

    • Have to concur here. Dump that link. Someone could send that link , this website to the FBI's Cybercrimes Unit/ Computer crimes unit. Agent Man 04:25, 15 September 2008 (CDT)
      • If you actually got a virus from going there, your computer must have been fucked already. ℴℓinnℯrnℯts

05:46, 15 September 2008 (CDT)

Wikipedia

Should mention this one to vandalize. Agent Man 19:30, 14 September 2008 (CDT)

They're full of shit anyway and HATE all users. Agent Man 19:31, 14 September 2008 (CDT)
Unless a user jacks off and does it on Wikipedia. Agent Man 19:33, 14 September 2008 (CDT)
Here is how to jack off, especially here as well. Agent Man 19:34, 14 September 2008 (CDT)

When vandalism is acceptable

Wouldn't vandalizing the userpages of faggots that get banned also fall into this category?0rmick 23:32, 22 January 2009 (CST)

vandalism is only acceptable on wikipedia Boss N1gger 18:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Boss N1gger

Why is is it pointless?

Nuff' said. There's two is'es in this header.

Can't edit the damned article >< --R1ky 11:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Reasons Vandalism is OK

I submit that vandalism that is not per-se destructive enough that the original lol is lost but is a genuine contribution in and of itself should be considered as an acceptable form of vandalism... in short


DISREGARD THAT I SUCK COCKS —The preceding comment was added by Motosierra, who is too much of a fucking retard to sign his or her own posts. IT'S 4 TILDES (~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE.

Link to this