Philosophy
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Philosophy is a pseudointellectual livejournal community that revels in its own stupidity. It is continually plagued by cloned community members asking the repetitive questions expected of braindead potheads.
Existential angst has caused the moderator, apperception, to develop an unusual fear of trolls. The user information contains a lengthy list of rules that include:
Contents |
[edit] Philosophical Quandries
Despite hopes for drama and lulz, a recent examination of the group found discussion to be insightful and erudite. Recent threads have contained stimulating intellectual debates about important topics that are relevant to current events:
- Quote "I, like Socrates, have never made a claim to wisdom."
- Philosophical Reply: "Don't compare yourself to Socrates. I decided that you were either an idiot or an asshole at that point and stopped reading." (See also Ad hominem)
- Quote "True agnosticism is therefore kept only in one small sphere -- the curious claim that no knowledge, positive, negative, or otherwise, about God is possible at all. This is contradictory. The true agnostic claims to know -- snore, snort, gurgle, snore."
- Philosophical Reply: "I expect better from you. This is sloppy work from beginning to end, and I know you can do much bet-- snort, snore, fart, snore." (See also Basement-dweller)
- Quote "A truly egalitarian society would have to provide more resources to people with more expensive tastes. Wouldn't this make perfectly innocent people with less expensive tastes work harder for others, and thus mad and envious?"
- Philosophical Reply: "Even before I was 5, I hated tunafish (which today I know to be cheap)." (See also Fucktard)
- Quote "Isnt it possible to be completely oppressed and still be entirely happy?"
- Philosophical Reply: "I would say that that's possible only if the oppressed person doesn't know about her state of being oppressed. And if the oppressee doesn't know she's oppressed, is she really completely oppressed?" (See also BDSM)
[edit] Spin Offs and Feuds
Anti-Kantians became enraged at the frequent mention of his name in the philosophy community and flounced away to form real_philosophy. There, debates are held at a much more sophisticated level, reaching a level of boredom and triviality so astounding that Stanford University has hailed it as the long-sought universal cure for insomnia.
The most important philosopher, however, is Emmanuelle Cunt [since Yuropean, pronounced 'ymunouel k'anth] whose main oeuvre is given in cinema form. Cunt belongs to the philosophical school of Philistines that advocates realities not seen, touched, or written. His main opponent is Jacques Derrida whose target was to stop thinking and dedicate all energy to writing.
[edit] Type of losers who take philosophy
[edit] Not To Be Confused With:
[edit] A Typical Entry In Philosophy
Does the espitemological evidence used in Russell's premise of Descartes' phiolsophy of faggotry paint a clear dyalectical picture of the said presime? Sorry if this seems to be too much of a Socratically cockannoying load of bullshit . . . etc. etc. ect.
The rest of the community will pretend to understand what's been said, to avoid looking stupid.
