WE MADE IT TO THE FINALS! NOW WE NEED YOUR VOTES MORE THAN EVER!!!Encyclopedia Dramatica is in contention for the 2nd Annual Mashable Open Web Awards for the wiki category. With your help, we can beat the Wikipedia menace! Plz vote for ED by going here; you can vote once per day, per email address, ballot stuffing encouraged! Just don't forget to confirm the vote via e-mail. VOTE OR DIE!!!
Talk:Anti-lulz
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Would Wikipedia count as anti-lulz or is it just failed attempts at humor? Also furry isn't an attempt at humor, it's an attempt not to be funny but ends up sometimes being funny like this image Image:Holychristfurfags.jpg Scottish Ape 20:53, 25 June 2007 (CDT)
[edit] Hrm
This article doesn't make me lol and dribble like a senile old cunt. What gives?-Ketthe KangaJew 21:27, 25 June 2007 (CDT)
- It's unclear what anti-lulz even is. It shoulda been deleted long ago. Scottish Ape 22:06, 25 June 2007 (CDT)
- It's unfunny because I wrote it. --Nakamura 12:36, 16 September 2007 (CDT)
- Agreed, this article reads like someone placed their brain on to a piece of paper and then attacked it with a large mallet. - Daveyp 11:35, 06 December 2007 (GMT)
- I find it ironic that the anti-lulz is unfunny. Perhaps that could lead to the funny? For that matter, there's not even a definition on the page—not even a subtle or contradictory one--Soarka318 15:32, 9 August 2008 (CDT)
[edit] Proposed merge
This might just be the TOWian in me talking, but personally, I think we should merge unfunny and this article. Honestly, unfunny is just fucking unfunny, to Uncyclopedia-esque.
