Talk:Chaos wraith x
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Okay, I think I'm done here, but the dumbass that I just pronged here will be coming with his sockpuppet legion to vandalize the article- for all the good it will do him. Time to go SPAM THIS BITCH all over the intarwebs. Rwetherby 03:49, 1 December 2007 (CST)
I wish I could make an article this good. Kudos to ya. Slayer of horizontal scroll bars, lulz 13:22, 1 December 2007 (CST)
As I previously pointed out, this article is terribly-written, isn't funny, and points to LJ articles that never existed (as can easily be determined by the high numbers in the HTML, not to mention that LJ entries rarely if ever start with 0), not to mention tons of user names that don't exist and were never registered. It shouldn't be that much of a stretch to the imagination to imagine that someone other than the target of this entry or his friends would find it to be so. This is clearly a smear campaign by one butthurt Son of art. - Xochipilli
I think this article is very funny, mostly because you think it isn't. The fact that you think it isn't means that you're just chaos_wraith_x come on here as a sock to whine like a little bitch. Oh noes! Not a smear campaign! Not on ED! Stop being such a douchebag. Comissarbutthurt 21:31, 3 December 2007 (CST)
You're very stupid if you think everyone that disagrees with you is the same person, Son of art. It's noteworthy that it's a 'smear campaign' and not funny because ED is for comedy, not pushing your personal internet tough guy vendetta. - Xochipilli
it's humorous that you accuse me of being Son_of_art just because I disagree with you, but then lecture me about doing it to you. You are chaos_wraith_x; it's perfectly obvious. And one day, you'll know who I am. If you really think that people don't make mean-spirited comedy here to push personal agendas, you're a bigger dumbass than I ever imagined. Comissarbutthurt 23:23, 4 December 2007 (CST)
- Okay. xochipilli 00:52, 5 December 2007 (CST)
[edit] STFU
Will you two fucking stop it already?? God, I fucking hate pagan drama. We should just ban all Wiccans from the encyclopedia. Dianoga 07:47, 5 December 2007 (CST)
- Nice try, sock puppet. Little-known fact: everyone on the internet is either me or him.
- Furthermore, we shouldn't just ban all Wiccans from the Encyclopedia, Wiccans should be banned from life. xochipilli 14:31, 5 December 2007 (CST)
[edit] Incessant Vandalism
The person whom this page is about continues to revert to a vandalized page, because he cannot take the lulz. One should not be banned because they make a page, but one SHOULD be banned for changing one because they're a little pussy. Perkyskirt 03:09, 10 December 2007 (CST)
- This page has been changed into what you keep trying to change it from because it wasn't funny or interesting, and was basically one long boring pissy tirade on the part of Son of Art thinly disguised as an ED article. You two morons might have trouble understanding this, considering that your apparent philosophy towards humor is "haha i said 'nigger' on this page haha 'nigger' you guys get it?" You yourself have admitted that the only reason you're pushing the issue is because you don't like the person in question, presumably because he dared to argue with you two douches about some stupid subject on some stupid community. Furthermore, it's interesting that you think the variety of people editing this article against you two losers, Sheneequa included, are all the same person. tl;dr: No one cares. Take it somewhere else. xochipilli 04:11, 10 December 2007 (CST)
Talk about tl;dr. Just like both version of the page in question. I'm only in it for the lulz. Perkyskirt 05:33, 10 December 2007 (CST)
- Then you could start by learning how to be funny. [This may help.] xochipilli 06:00, 10 December 2007 (CST)

