Talk:Childfree
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
'Of course, the childfree posters *are* superior. Moos can only dream of their children growing up to be bitter, angry jerks who hate their parents and spend their time on livejournal. hahahaha. I'm always impressed when someone can make fun of a group I like in an entertaining way. --33mhz 10:18, 14 Dec 2004 (PST)
Childfree people believe that they, as humans, were mistakenly brought into this world and they are still bitter about it.
Spoken well and truly like a person who never once visited the community and knows nothing about the subject s/he is discussing.
Spoken like a holier-than-thou jerk who can't even sign his/her own name. :)
--twid 19:52, 21 Dec 2004 (PST)
Spoken like a holier-than-thou jerk who can't even sign his/her own name. :)
You greatly amuse me by proving me right through your own ignorance.
To sign your name and help avoid confusion, you simply hit the squigly looking button at the top that looks like a signature. If you mouse over it, it actually says it's a signature button. If yoy'd rather just type out the signature/timestamp markup, simply put a --~~~~ at the end of your post. That's two dashes -- and then 4 tildas. :] --girlvinyl 21:47, 21 Dec 2004 (PST)
To sign your name and help avoid confusion, you simply hit the squigly looking button at the top that looks like a signature. If you mouse over it, it actually says it's a signature button. If yoy'd rather just type out the signature/timestamp markup, simply put a --Limitless333 22:00, 21 Dec 2004 (PST) at the end of your post. That's two dashes -- and then 4 tildas. :]
I'd wondered about that; thank you. :) --Limitless333 22:00, 21 Dec 2004 (PST)
Only a childfree snob would say "greatly amuse". --twid 22:19, 21 Dec 2004 (PST)
Only a childfree snob would say "greatly amuse".
I fail to see how utilizing the English language in a manner above the level of a remedial grammar school student bears any reflection upon one's status concerning children. But please, do continue with your badly punctuated and increasingly juvenile repartee; I remain highly entertained.--Limitless333 22:26, 21 Dec 2004 (PST)
- here on the internet we use the vernacular; also, semicolons are disgusting. oh no, i didn't capitalize properly. i must be as ignorant as e.e. cummings. --Argos 03:26, 22 Dec 2004 (PST)
Actually, my good sir, if you should have the chance to read the excellent book "Eats, Shoots, Leaves" you would learn that the ending quote certainly doesn't always have to come after the period, forsooth. But thou hast showeth me that, indeed, thou art not a holier-than-thou snob at all, oh no. Thanks for spreading the lurve. :) --twid 22:35, 21 Dec 2004 (PST)
whee, edit wars! i can play this game too :) --twid 22:38, 21 Dec 2004 (PST)
Actually, my good sir, if you should have the chance to read the excellent book "Eats, Shoots, Leaves" you would learn that the ending quote certainly doesn't always have to come after the period, forsooth. But thou hast showeth me that, indeed, thou art not a holier-than-thou snob at all, oh no. Thanks for spreading the lurve. :)
"Shown," not "showeth" in that context, and the use of the familiar "thou," "thee" or "thy" to a stranger is an insult. If you intended it as such, nicely done. If not....
You do have a point concerning the quotes as, in the Queen's English, I believe that the quote is indeed not required to follow after the period. However, that was also not the punctuation I was referencing.
I also find it interesting that you assume I'm a man.--Limitless333 22:54, 21 Dec 2004 (PST)
I'm not sure you have to be. I'm not and it's allowing me to comment. So far I've managed to get into a lovely little argument with someone who is either the author of the "article" or another of her/his type. It's rather entertaining and I'm hoping it'll turn into a flame war. I do so love baiting the ignorant types.
Nice. :)
--twid 23:31, 21 Dec 2004 (PST)
jesus christ the childfree people are deranged. it takes a lot of balls to be in the livejournal childfree community then come here and write syrupy prose like what has been submitted. "Childfree people are just like you and me?????" I don't think so. --07:31, 22 Dec 2004 (PST)
Jesus Christ, you're deranged! Just because people have made a choice to not have children does not mean there's anything wrong with them. My God, it's people like you and the original author of this thread who somehow think that it's a woman's mandate in life to spit out babies and stay home with the kids while the man goes out to plow the south forty that make me sick. There is absolutely nothing wrong with not having kids. NOTHING. In fact, to choose to not bring a child into this screwed up world where parents have no rights anyway is more responsible BY FAR than any of the baby factories out there that have them indiscriminately. Just because a person would rather not take on the responsibility doesn't mean they have to be demonized. I bet the original poster was someone who disagreed and got so mad that no one else agreed with him/her that he stomped over here and made the whine--er... I'm sorry, "article". --Jonrd463 09:52, 22 Dec 2004 (PST)
Man, you're pretty bitter. But most of you childfree people are like that. You've got a lot of guts though coming from childfree and complaining about anyone demonizing people. Kudos to you and your balls of steel. :) --twid 10:30, 22 Dec 2004 (PST)
Two things. First, I'm not even a part of the Childfree community. My fiance is, and I happen to agree with the choice to remain childfree. Second, how am I bitter? Please, since you're obviously psychic and can read my thoughts, motivations, etc., tell me why I'm bitter? Is it because I have a successful career and want to enjoy the financial benefits that not having having children provides? Am I bitter because my fiance and I have the freedom to come and go as we please without having to find a babysitter? Gee, sounds to me like YOU might be the bitter one here. --Jonrd463 19:01, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
You're bitter because you're sitting on the internet obsessively hitting refresh so you can update your argument with an inconsequential person on an inconsequential website. I'm here because the creator of this website is my friend and I'm having a lot of fun updating the site. How about you? What exactly are you trying to create here? How is commenting here helping you? :) --twid 19:05, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
And you're not doing the same thing? You have more posts here than me, so you've basically zinged yourself in trying to come up with a zinger for me. I am merely stating an opinion, as are you, the original writer, and everyone else here. Funny how I can do something and I'm bitter and obsessed, while you can do the same thing and not be. Your reply to this message will only serve as proof. --Jonrd463 19:13, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Hi, this is Jon's fiancee. I'm the one that originally pointed him to this article from the childfree community. I have a lot of reasons for wanting to remain childfree, and I find it amazing how people can be... well, bitchy. Here's a question for twid and anyone else out there: how is our decision to not have children directly affecting your lives? Is it so bad that you get chest pains when you go to the childfree community and see all these people who are childfree? By the by, there are some parents on that community. They're there to commiserate about other stupid parents who should not have reproduced to start with. A personal decision that I make shouldn't bother you in the least. As far as our reasons for posting here... You posted an incredibly biased article and you don't want to let us state our reasons or reflect our side of the argument. It's not fair to us. --LongQuiet 19:18, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Your replies only serve to prove how bitter you both are. I'm sorry that you want to have children, but that for whatever reason, perhaps an unhappy childhood, you won't. Continuing this thread just shows it. Contining to read childfree and try to change the story here shows that you aren't complete people, that you need external validation. You need to assure yourself that your choice to be childfree is correct by continuously demonizing those who have kids, and by spending your time on this website.
As for your question about me. I'm here to drive traffic to this site for my friend. :) --twid 19:23, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Oh my God, I'm in stitches here. No, really, the hilarity never ends! This is going to be my last post, because you are obviously lacking in some mental faculty that allows sane people to conclude that not having children is healthy and ok. I'm deeply sorry that your Mennonite or otherwise Puritanical roots taught you that to have purpose you must have children. It's obvious to me that you sincerely believe that and have a need to project that narrow way of thinking on to other people. My fiance and I choose to not have children because we enjoy the freedom it gives us, as I've already said. We can, on a whim, go on a road trip, or go out to eat, or go to area attractions. And because we're not having to cover the expenses of a child, we've got mad money out the wazoo to either spend on ourselves or other people, or to invest. The more I read these inane posts by you and your kind, the more I just want to whip out my bankstatement, smile, and say "Hey man, enjoy those kids of your's. I'm going to enjoy a night on the town with the one I love." Have a nice child-bound life! --Jonrd463 19:36, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
it just never ends does it? i don't think they get that this is a website about HUMOR and SATIRE and of course things aren't going to be "fair and balanced." i myself don't want kids but i can at least put up with them and don't overreact to little things. you people are nuts. --Killhamster 19:39, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Goodness me, oh my! How people are very angry on this board. Can't we all just get along? Certainly since the childfree aren't in thr streets shooting at children to make them dance, then we can agree that them calling women with their litters of children at the midnight showing of a movie, a moo? Certainly your head can twist itself around the fact that children possess the ability to be annoying at times? Can't you? Please tell me you can.
Twid - you speak of the community members "demonizing" people who have chosen to have kids. You're selectively reading, I think, because when we DO say things like, "God, what a moo" or "look at this stupid woman, she went and killed her kid and it was preventable if she was smarter" we are not demonizing people who have chosen to have children. We are mocking the people who have kids, and refuse to own up to the responsibility. We live in an enlightened world - your child does not need to behave like a little savage. There are good parents, and there are posts referring to those good parents. I am aware that this site is supposedly satire, but let's be realistic. Everything in that article is inflammatory and rude. I'm aware that a lot of people contributed to write it. It doesn't change the basic nature of it. If you are going to allow people to pour forth rancor, you should also allow us to defend ourselves. We (the members of the LJ community) are tired of being condemned en masse for what the editors percieve as the errors of the few.
And hamster? What kind of person are you to post here, bitching at us, and then post in the childfree community itself with essentially the same comment? We are "nuts" ... and you wonder why we want to defend ourselves against people like you who want to lump us all into one group and send the whole lot to hell just because you disagree with us.
And thank you to the previous poster! Kids can be annoying. Not all kids are annoying when raised correctly. We like reading the LJ community because these are people who understand our frustration and we don't have to listen to people bitch at us for having an opinion of our own. (people such as the ones who wrote the article) --LongQuiet 19:53, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Certainly since the childfree aren't in thr streets shooting at children to make them dance, then we can agree that them calling women with their litters of children at the midnight showing of a movie, a moo?
We should be able to edit our posts, sorry. I meant to say "Then we can agree that them calling women with their litters of children at the midnight showing of a movie, a moo, is harmless.
--And I really need to learn how to sign my name.....Help!
Look up at the top of the edit window, there's a row of icons. The last one on the right is a large dash. Go to the one to the left of it (looks like a squiggle) and click it, it'll add your name in. --LongQuiet 20:01, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
OH MY GOD I AM GOING TO KILL ALL OF YOU!!!! ahghghghghghghghghgh. Ok, I'm ok. Seriously, it's all cool. *deep breath*
--girlvinyl 20:05, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Hurray! Now people know it's me who's writing! I'm glad since I left last night, that 'hitting a kid with a car' thing has been edited. --Suraisan 20:06, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
- pats girlvinyl on the back* There, there. Everything is alright.
P.S What do you have against dancing poodles?
--Suraisan 20:08, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Everything in that article is inflammatory and rude.
I think, finally, you're beginning to understand. Look, I'm sorry that your mom left you parked in front of the TV all the time, or you got yelled at because you touched yourself at night, or whatever left you bitter and heartless and cold. I'm really happy that you found someone else that enjoys your love for a night on the town, unencumbered by kids and free to put on a ferret suit and have wild sex deep into the night. And I'm completely happy that you're so comfortable with your childfree beliefs that you have nothing to prove to anyone, and that you and your financee spend your time off the internet enjoying your freedom.
Congratulations. --twid 20:50, 22 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Ambitiousgirl - That was the worst whitewashing ever. Even a cf member has to admit the group makes some mistakes, and does some flaming and trolling, and occasionally likes to channel their inner ferret. And deleting every link that looks negative just makes it look like more propaganda coming from the community. Shouldn't you be busy sprucing up your fursuit or whatever it is that you people do for fun? --twid 00:19, 23 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Look, I'm sorry that your mom left you parked in front of the TV all the time, or you got yelled at because you touched yourself at night, or whatever left you bitter and heartless and cold. I'm really happy that you found someone else that enjoys your love for a night on the town, unencumbered by kids and free to put on a ferret suit and have wild sex deep into the night. And I'm completely happy that you're so comfortable with your childfree beliefs that you have nothing to prove to anyone, and that you and your financee spend your time off the internet enjoying your freedom.
I'll have you know that I am childfree, and of the current generation of teenagers. Growing up, I a) almost never watched TV. I grew up reading books, coloring, playing with Playdoh, and the most TV shows that I grew up on were the Bob Ross stuff. You know, art TV. b)When I was little, my mother told me all the parts of the female reproduction system, and what sex was and wasn't. c) I'm asexual. No sex now, later, or in a ferret suit. I'm sorry that something went up your ass and died, and left you bitter, but I'm really glad to hear that sterotyping is alive and well.*
Since we are all into sterotyping this lovely week, let me start.** - African-American (black) people should be called niggers. They live in the ghetto, and have four kids by the time they're twelve. They are always on welfare. - Hispanics are Puerto Rican, have just as many kids as the blacks, and kill each other off in gang wars. They are so stupid that the goverment has to give them food stamps. We should call them chile peppers. - Asian people/Pacific Islanders (Yellow) should be called chinks. They are the smartest minority, and eat only food from thier country of origin. They do not speak english, and are pretty much doomed to sell fish or be Chinese/Thai/(insert type of oriental food here). - White people are supposed to be called whitey. They are white trash, and live in the liquor section of the grocery store. They all think that they are vampires, sluts, the man, or sushi. They are racist. - People of mixed race share the bad characteristic of all of the races of their background. - The Native Americans are to be called redskins, and are all gambling boozeheads. They live in Teepees and are savages.
That's the world according to you.
- The bit about sterotyping is is sarcasm, the rest is serious.
- What do you think I am, Green? I am one of the races above, and for which one I'll leave up to you. Note that I do not believe this bullshit, because everyone is different, and skin color just means that your skin is this color.
-Rabidbunnyninjas
To sign your name and help avoid confusion, you simply hit the squigly looking button at the top that looks like a signature. If you mouse over it, it actually says it's a signature button. If yoy'd rather just type out the signature/timestamp markup, simply put a --~~~~ at the end of your post. That's two dashes -- and then 4 tildas. :] --girlvinyl 01:07, 23 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Rabidbunnyninjas: It's really funny that you're a teenager and bragging about the fact that you are childfree. GOOD FOR YOU. I realize that since you are in your teens you probably believe that you are invincible and omnipotent, but once you move out of you bedroom at home into the real world, you'll realize that world is not a perfect place. In fact, the world is much more tribal and less logical than most people think. In these tribes, people fuck and procreate in order to keep their DNA strands replicating. In these tribes, there are plenty of people who frankly don't give a flying fuck what you think of their kids. So what you're saying is that your opinion is more important than anyone else's? You fascist. I'm here innocently expressing my opinion of the childfree community, and you insist on disrespecting me. Well, that's what I've come to expect from the childfree community. You're all a bunch of bratty know-it-alls who feel *so* superior about that fact that rather than having kids you masturbate to japanese tentacle rape porn. Well, I'm here to tell you that you're no better than me. Your speech about stereotyping would bring a tear to my eye if your community didn't regularly call any parent who dared to allow their child to express him or herself in public a "moo". Your speech about stereotyping would move me if you and your childfree friends didn't regularly pass judgement on parents, something which, by definition, you know nothing about. You may think you're smarter than anyone else, but I, for one, will not be swayed by your fascist thought police ways. --twid 02:29, 23 Dec 2004 (GMT)
RUBY: You can try to whitewash the comments here and the childfree page all you want, but deleting things that seem negative to you is just the typical tactic of someone who can't fact facts. --twid 02:33, 23 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Contents |
[edit] omgwtfbbq
GAH! I have tried my best to stay out of this article, and I really think I have done a good job. BUT WHAT THE FUCK! Why the hell would anyone delete the awesome accutane pic? That's so funny! omg. LAME. I put it back cause that picture is comedy gold [tm, something awful 2003]. --girlvinyl 01:30, 23 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Okay, everyone. I think it's pretty apparent now that twid has no desire to open his mind and change his convictions. Twid, with all your insults and sweeping generalizations condemning an entire communtiy, I see how you hate/pity us. But quite frankly, a person like generates the greatest pity from me. You are a person who will float through life obliviously, with your opinions set in stone despite the changes around you. People were put on this earth to breed and nothing less, and I don't think the approaching apocolypse would sway you in your thinking. People who do not hold your values on children are ridiculed. I'm not saying you can't disagree with us, or how we broach subjects like the ones listed in your article, but quite frankly the picture you are trying to paint the childfree people of as abused, neglected, furrie sex fiends is not true and was written to only to slander. I hope in the future, when you disagree with someone, you can construct reasonable arguments, and not resort to fairy-tales. --Suraisan 03:13, 23 Dec 2004 (GMT)
-- Oi, Suraisan! Don't worry. It's just the intarweb. It's not like anything on here is real anyway. ^_~ Tubgirl is a myth, as is goatse, and all of us are myths too. Don't worry. All is good. Plus, "dramatica"! It's not like they are going to be cuddly sweet. --Goescrunch 02:42, 31 Dec 2004 (GMT)
[edit] oh you silly furries
So, financially secure couples who wish to have a child or two of their own are now Mennonite? Everyone has to have the same aspirations now? Am I a farmer because I have pets and other people have absolutely no desire to own a furry critter of their own? Were their parents dumb, bible humping fucks because they wanted to have children? They were children once too (in most cases are still children... I don't consider anyone under 21 an adult), so they are all horrible daemons that should have been aborted.
I had to look that word up Mennonite on dictionary.com. It says here: A member of an Anabaptist church characterized particularly by simplicity of life, pacifism, and nonresistance
I'm still trying to figure out how that pertains to the discussion at hand.
Am I a farmer because I have pets and other people have absolutely no desire to own a furry critter of their own? No, no you wouldn't. Furthermore, a person who has children isn't automatically a breeder as your analogy is trying to suggest. The thing that makes up a breeder is their parenting style and not possession of children. Poor parents=breeder, Good parent=idolized
Were their parents dumb, bible humping fucks because they wanted to have children? A bible humping fuck is someone who spits out as many children as possible despite having proper resources for them, all IN THE NAME OF DA LAWWD!! Because GAWD says to have'em babies and if you don't, you'll make da baby jesus cry!!! Obviously, you know that is not the primary reason that people have babies, so no, they wouldn't be bible humping fucks.
They were children once too
I'm childfree, and I didn't like kids when I was a kid. I preferred to be by myself. Also, childhood isn't an option, if we could choose to be born at 21 I would wager most of us would.
they are all horrible daemons that should have been aborted
You're painting with a rather wide brush there. Every person in the childfree community is a horrible demon who should have been aborted? That is an example of ignorance trying to write off a belief because it doesn't agree with your own. Come up with something better.--Suraisan 04:37, 23 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Amen to everything Suraisan and Rabidbunny said. We're complaining because the people who wrote this (and keep editing it) paint EVERY childfree person as a demon that should be avoided. We are normal contributing members of society. Every one of us pays taxes - including school taxes that we won't use because we don't have kids. That's fine for us. I said before that we mock the STUPID parents, who don't seem to have the proper parenting skills to raise a child. You seem to overlook the fact that there are several PARENTS in the LJ community. We love them because they take the time and effort to teach their children how to behave. Just because we don't want children doesn't mean we're wrong. It means we have a different opinion than you. Everything written in that article is slanderous, and is hardly what I would term sarcastic writing. I'd like it to be noted that this is NOT the opinion of everyone and that it is largely sarcasm (and discriminatory, as well as slander) ... I made an edit the other day and I see it has been removed and MORE venom has replaced it. I added nothing that didn't follow the rules of the community. Everything I put in was carefully neutral. I find it ridiculous and RUDE of the "moderators" (and especially you, twid, since you seem to be doing most of the harm here) would continue to allow this hurtful drivel to remain. We don't need more people reading this and assuming it's fact, and then going out and bitching at us because we're content in our choices in life.
I came from a happy family - the last of three children. I didn't watch TV often, and when I did it was the discover channel. I read lots and lots of books. Once I even read through most of the Encyclopedia Brittanica because I was bored. I reject the concept that I MUST breed in order to have a place in heaven or become a viable member of society. I work, I pay my taxes, I give to charity, I have no criminal record, and that's all that should be expected of me. If I am happy with my pets and my choice to live childfree, then you should respect that choice and not criticize me for it because YOU were raised to think that those who didn't breed were BAD BAD BAD people. It's sad, because discrimination is alive and well. And the childfree people are not limited JUST to one race. There are all kinds. You should not try and compartmentalize us into one broad, generally-evil group.
Girlvinyl admitted that she knew nothing of the childfree LJ community when she posted the article. Neither do you. You are making uneducated potshots and we'd like you to acknowledge that we have a perfectly legit reason for being offended.
--LongQuiet 17:24, 23 Dec 2004 (GMT)
Hi. I did not originally post this article. It's plain to see in the history. I added the accutane picture - BECAUSE ITS FUNNY and I love it.
[edit] get over it and STFU childfree wank fucks
geebus keeriste, shut up and get over it. it's satire. you bitch about your community not hurting anybody unless they come in and choose to get offended but it's the same point here. almost all of the big lj communities get (or will get) parodied here. if you want a fair and balanced encyclopedia article, go to a fair and balanced encyclopedia. if you can't accept humor at your own expense then please go stab yourself in the throat. SchmuckyTheCat 19:28, 23 Dec 2004 (GMT)
geebus keeriste, shut up and get over it. it's satire. you bitch about your community not hurting anybody unless they come in and choose to get offended but it's the same point here. almost all of the big lj communities get (or will get) parodied here. if you want a fair and balanced encyclopedia article, go to a fair and balanced encyclopedia. if you can't accept humor at your own expense then please go stab yourself in the throat
I like to think I have a very good sense of humor. I laugh all the time with my family and crack jokes, even if they are pointed at me. The point of satire is to be humorous, and quite frankly, I don't find this humorous. There is a certain line where it no longer is satire and becomes...something else, like ranting. This is a rant presented as fact, when it isn't. Now, I recognise the authors right to write whatever it is he wishes. I left the original article in tact and added my edit to the end, to present another point of view. He then proceeded to butcher it, and nothing resembling what I wrote is left. Maybe thats how it is here, but it would have been courteous to let people see both sides of the story.
And sorry, I can't stab myself in the neck. I'm not allowed to play with knifes :D
- so it's just too mean? WAH WAH! cry me a fucking river. there is a kernel of fact to every statement here, so get over it. and, ranting is hilarious.SchmuckyTheCat 22:44, 23 Dec 2004 (GMT)
[edit] Hell yea...
I know I totally hate children. Sometimes I feel like taking large Hello Kitty snowglobes and bludgeoning the lil brats. Anyone who disagrees with me is lame, and totally not bitchy. :-P Oooh, the sun will be up soon. The kids will wake, and I can go outside to fling rocks at them... and a brick. --Goescrunch 11:27, 29 Dec 2004 (GMT)
[edit] tl;dr
I'm just going to state for the record what I would hope would be inherently obvious to anyone with a pulse and half a brain: nobody here actually cares one way or the other whether you or anyone else decides to shit out a baby. We just think all the OMGDRAMA that clings to you Childfree types like yiffstains to a fursuit is A+ funny. The fact that you're trying to have an actual debate on a drama site with drama people is the only evidence needed to convict you all of epic stupidity.
Wait... You mean this was making fun of us? Oh crap, I'm in the wrong place...
Where can I go to find someone who seriously understands my serious desire to seriously harm non-serious children in a serious way, seriously? --Goescrunch 02:39, 31 Dec 2004 (GMT)
[edit] My take on the whole thing
ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT ABORT --Alexjon 01:14, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] One small edit
The EW A KID TOUCHED ME line was repeated twice. I removed one of them. Hope no one is mad. --Splatterer 15:06, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)
[edit] "Gallup" Section
What's the point? It's severly lacking in lulz. --Chineseinbed 22:30, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Kids are dumb,loud and expensive
There is no reason why i dont wont kids;like the world is a cruel place or the world is overcrowded blah blah blah.Kids are just loud,dumb and expensive and i would rather raise a Chia Pet and let some other sucker be enslaved to a child.Just dont expect me(taxpayer) to foot the bill for the miscreant when the novelty of parenting wears off.
- Well, Dick, I see your point. But, much like dead babies, children are tasty. Like, I believe that parents who can't raise their children properly should send them to me, care of B&B Meats and co. Unfortunately, you don't get to choose what you will and will not pay for in taxes. You're going to end up paying for a lot of government bullshit (read as "subsidies") anyway. Actually, only a small portion of your money goes to children. The rest goes toward making the world (read as "america") a shittier place. I guess what I'm getting at here is that you need to go smoke some cock and calm the fuck down down. Resistance is futile, nobody cares about your opinion, least of all the government. --mustard!ass Eat 09:02, 6 Mar 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wait, what?
Sorry, I thought this was a circle jerk. --King Pudding 00:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Wow, you know, it's a good way to keep down the population, but why the drama? --SoulfulZen
[edit] ROFL
Ohhhh God, LOL. The fuckups learned how to use circular logic! Kudos to you, but it appears you still have yet to realise that we couldn't give a shit about your wanting to have kids or not, but the drama you constantly chug out instead.
Just to clear up some of your misconception, O child-loathing ones; whether you like it or not, your existence basically comes down to fucking, making babies and nothing else. Whether you believe in evolution or not, at some point in time, your ancestors all fucked and became 'moos'. If childhood was such a burden, it makes me wonder why you spent your time cry-bitching and blaming your parents instead of becoming an hero and shooting yourself and sparing yourself of the bitterness and lulz that you came to stink of though the internets.
That's really all it's for--the lulz, and you're providing us with plenty, old as the discussions may be.
Sorry, I just had to say this. This article is hilarious, and its talk page is making me laugh even harder. I just wish I was there at the time. It makes me want to do some serious LJ-trolling. ;) --Rachie 05:02, 24 August 2007 (CDT)
[edit] Wow.
How terribly ironic this entire article is. Numerous times it's stated that the CF group can't comprehend the thought of someone having different ideals, yet the article is taking the same fucking position. Oh how could they hate kids this much? What, they don't like other opinions either? I can't agree with that, but I will do the same. Ridiculous. --Teffen 17:37, 25 November 2007 (CST)
Child free is clearly a bunch of crazy fucktards. It's quite frightening that they can think that something that is the result of EVOLUTION is inhuman, than they need to be in thier feminazi plans derailed!--Frostflame 20:17, 21 February 2008 (CST)
Every time I see a childfree wanker, oh sorry, asexual i wish they parents should been childless.
Atleast time & evolution works for the betterment of mankind in this. I wonder how happy the brainfrees will be with their money when they will grow old and became an insane Scrooge replica without a family.
You are going to die alone.
