Talk:Darknest

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

The terrible irony is that the people who were banned from Darknest and edit this article most frequently are the ones who take it most seriously. For reference, see the long history of edits removing any negative comment someone tries to make about Blood-Eagle and the comment from Vestra just below this. Remember kiddos, it's only lulz if it's not about you!

V: Hi kaylee, seeing as this is the only way I can engage in a half decent conversation because anything else is censored, I don't have a huge amount of options. I made a post that I would of liked to be read, and considered, if only quietly in a private admin forum. I've relinked it at the bottom of this page so that other people can have the oppertunity to read it. And for the record, I didn't post that screenshot up. (K: I know, I posted it. Because I enjoy making fun of myself as well as others. It's all about the lulz.) Thanks.

^ This is SERIOUS BUSINESS. (V: qq)

Hey, Luigirules, can't you just lock the part about me or something? I really don't care what's on this site, and I don't know that Sky person or why he keeps removing my entry. -kay

This article seems kind of tame considering what you could really say about a lot of the people on Darknest. I thought of contributing, but ED is too full of unfunny faggots. It's like the something awful of wikipedia. Oh yeah I almost forgot to point out the thick gooey irony of anyone on encyclopedia dumbatica saying that moderators on other message boards delete posts that make them look bad, when everyone knows that no one does that shit more than the people who run ED.