Talk:Genocide

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

dumb. no information. no lulz- wackyc20 8/28/05

• Yeah, it hasn't got much better. That's why it still has the {{crap}} template. --Banbot talk to Banbot 03:43, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• ED isn't here for information, though. --Banbot talk to Banbot 03:44, 29 Aug 2005 (UTC)
• I completely rewrote this, but it's not great. I took the {{crap}} template off, but it may still deserve it.--yirimyah//bitch 06:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • I like the re-write much better. Adding more to it would be cool too, so far looks good though. --girlvinyl
    • The re-write is totally retarded, just more of the lame "george bush is an idiot, god kills a kitten, lol jew azn poo poo" "jokes" over and over again.. the last version had at least SOME wit .. ~ Banaan 10:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] For the record

We -ARE- here for information when that information is about memes, internet happenings or drama reporting. It's totally fine to put facts in articles. The mediacrat article is the best example of FACTUAL articles which bring the lulz. GET IT? This stuff isn't hard but the concept still seems to evade people. The mediacrat article, for which this wiki was started, talks about something that is real. It gives details of what happened. The things that happened are hilarious, but that doesn't take away from the fact that the article is more or less factual. Great. ok? ok! --girlvinyl 07:01, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

• Mmm, we wouldn't want to be Uncyclopedia now would we? Then all our lulz would die and God would kill a kitten.--yirimyah//bitch 07:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• GV has a point. We need internets in this article, too. I don't know whether to keep this-Ket 07:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Like, internets genocide? I have no knowledge on that topic.--yirimyah//bitch 07:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Someone should hunt around for some genocide/nazi/whatever related internet drama that could fit in here and write something in a new section. That'd give it relevance-Ket 07:19, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] This article doesn't need internet

Any indiscipline will result in ban ~ Banaan 11:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

And I won't compromise with the unfunny ~ Banaan 11:46, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

• Oh WTF?! I've been trying to improve an article because it was in [[Category:Crap]]. Other people think it's fine, the fucking site owner thinks it's "much better", more people suggest things to add and I DO, but YOU just fucking keep clicking REVERT. Go write a page yourself and stop fucking other people's work up.--yirimyah//bitch 11:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • GET ME A DRINK!! ~ Banaan 16:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
  • He's written more pages than pretty much anyone so that was kind of dumb. Also, are you sure GV was talking about your edit?--WKD 12:01, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Yep, it was like 5 min after I redid it. I assume it was in Recent changes. --yirimyah//bitch 12:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC)