Talk:Grawp/Archive1

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Jump to: navigation, search
THIS PAGE IS BEING WATCHED BY ENEMIES OF THE LULZ
THEY GOT TIRED OF PLAYING SOLO

Contents

cockpuppets

I noticed the articled called his socks "cockpuppets". I think that term originated when a wikipedia checkuser blocked one of Malber's socks with "cockpuppet of Malber" and then Wikipedia's administration tried to pretend like it was merely a typo. Ritegroic 10:13, 5 April 2008 (CDT)

Grawp hasn't even touched [1]. Ritegroic 10:27, 5 April 2008 (CDT)

I'd like to make this article of the now

I'm quite sure I can expand and improve it. Grawp himself is obviously butthurt about this page.--ByAppointmentTo 17:03, 5 April 2008 (CDT)

Grawp - email me

Send me an email explaining your motivations for your vandalism. I'm interested. You can do that by going to my userpage and saying something other than HAGGER or just admitting it here.--ByAppointmentTo 17:21, 13 April 2008 (CDT)

well done with this article, its absolutely amazing. Albertluque 04:49, 19 April 2008 (CDT)

Headstrust

Headstrust is an account I made way before I ever decided to become Grawp. Yeah, I keep forgetting that it’s “Headstrust,” not “Headsthrust.” BTW, all page moves that contain “HAGGER?” in the title are me. — Headsthust 18:24, 19 April 2008 (CDT)

Also, ByAppointmentTo, I need moar accounts. Just post them here, then remove the posts so the Wikifags don't see them. — Headsthust 18:26, 19 April 2008 (CDT)

  • Fabulous. BTW, your article on here is frontpaged some time early next month because I love you. I hate reverting your vandalism. But I love you in principle. :) White•Mystery

Alright, all the accounts provided on my talk page have been stolen by someone else, most likely that bitch Urban Rose. I have fixed the e-mail preferences so that I can now receive e-mail: Special:Emailuser/Headsthust. — Grawp 19:59, 21 April 2008 (CDT)

I don't see any contribs or block log on any of those accounts, but OK.--ByAppointmentTo 04:59, 22 April 2008 (CDT)
  • You have mail Grawp, have fun. --lateral |talk| 18:38, 25 April 2008 (CDT)

Lol, guess who really got the accounts: [2]. — Grawp 21:27, 25 April 2008 (CDT)

I IRLol'd

OMGZ...I missed this while I was in the pokey. I've nevar seen such an ahsum collision of /b/ and TOW. E.P.I.C. --Image:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifOldDirtyBtardImage:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gif • WUT? 22:09, 20 April 2008 (CDT)

Just needs a few moar pics to go down the line with the quotes, and I'm going to add the {{perfect}} template.--ByAppointmentTo 03:29, 21 April 2008 (CDT)

I think this page should be deleted

Virgins like Grawp practically orgasm to crap like this. All this page is doing is glorifying his stupidity and encouraging him to vandalize countless wikis. And who is to say he won't vandalize this wiki as well?--Mojo973 13:13, 21 April 2008 (CDT)

  • Either he or an imposter already vandalizes this wiki on occasion. But I don't think it's him. Either way, it's for the lulz, and it's not a big deal. While this article may have upped his ego to levels at which it shouldn't be, we have a section on his USI to take care of that. ED exists primarily to document internet drama, and this article fits the bill perfectly. There's no reason to delete it. ~ Endedrural (talk)

But this is a great lulz article, which is going to be chose for article of the now. Albertluque 16:22, 21 April 2008 (CDT)

History delete

I wouldn't be so sure, Grawp. When you see it, you'll shit bricks... or you would if I hadn't already pointed it out.
I wouldn't be so sure, Grawp. When you see it, you'll shit bricks... or you would if I hadn't already pointed it out.

What’s up with the history purge? You that paranoid about Giovanni di Stefano? Seriously, what are the chances of him searching through the different revisions of this article? — Grawp 21:41, 23 April 2008 (CDT)

The higher powers on ED have stated that there must never be a GDS article, nor may he be mentioned in articles.--ByAppointmentTo 10:06, 25 April 2008 (CDT)

FOR FUCK’S SAKE, please stop deleting the fucking revisions of this article. I like to see what changes are made to the article, but it’s getting very difficult (also, the page views get reset to zero). — Grawp 15:58, 27 April 2008 (CDT)

Also, here’s some good quotes. Some stuff here (logs) and some stuff here (logs). — Grawp 15:59, 27 April 2008 (CDT)


  • That final fantasy wiki has the gayest talk pages I've ever seen. White•Mystery
    • My actions there also caused some major butt-hurt drama.[3] When I think of BlueHighwind, I get a huge mental facepalm. Also, look at how that thread degenerated. *Facepalm. — Grawp 16:07, 27 April 2008 (CDT)
  • What a giant, pathetic circle jerk. Also lol @ "miles of code" and the months you must have spent preparing for that attack. White•Mystery
Grawp, I'll stop deleting the page history of this if you perform some more epic win against various wikis. I'm thinking the German, French and Italian Wikipedias could be vulnerable. Babelfish is always there to translate.-ByAppointmentTo 16:18, 27 April 2008 (CDT)
Oh yeah and let's not forget the Polish Wikipedia, and for that matter, the Russian Wikipedia. They all deserve their taste of HAGGER?????????????????????????????--ByAppointmentTo 16:20, 27 April 2008 (CDT)
  • Meh, been there, done that (German, Log for The Simpsons article at the Spanish Wikipedia [note the “Eliminar goatse”], Spanish, Spanish [logs ], Spanish, Spanish [logs], Spanish, Spanish, French, French [That account name used to be “Darkonoko loves to suck cum out of Grawp's giant dick.” French bastards renamed it to “・renommé 20071128” and deleted most of the contributions, which were goatse. See this for much lulz. Also, here’s an example of their history censorship; note the November 25, 2007, deletion summary at 12:34 by Alchemica], Alemannic German, Amharic [that account name used to be “Loveless” but was renamed to “Renamed vandalism account”], Anglo-Saxon [that account name used to be “Loveless” but was renamed to “Renamed vandalism account”], Aragonese, Aramaic [that account name used to be “Loveless” but was renamed to “Renamed vandalism account”], Aromanian [that account name used to be “Loveless” but was renamed to “Renamed vandalism account”], Franco-Provençal/Arpitan [that account name used to be “Az1568” but was renamed to “Imposter 01”], Franco-Provençal/Arpitan [that account name used to be “Raul654” but was renamed to “P322”], Franco-Provençal/Arpitan [that account name used to be “Loveless” but was renamed to “Imposter 02”], Franco-Provençal/Arpitan [that account name used to be “Drini” but was renamed to “Imposter 03”], Azerbaijani [that account name used to be “Raul654” but was renamed to “S--D 45pm1qd301m-o7U-H53s0di R-m A4 G5MV va 7Wc-1”], Azerbaijani, Bengali [that account name used to be “Loveless” but was renamed to “Renamed vandalism account”], Min Nan [that account name used to be “Loveless” but was renamed to “Renamed vandalism account”], my move vandalism at the Kabyle Wikipedia caused this epic interwiki bot edit to the English Wikipedia, resulting in this and this discussion, and there’s a bunch more; just go through the interwiki links on the United Kingdom article because I’m tired of doing it myself, Afrikaans [same goes for the Mahmoud Ahmadinejad article], and Persian). — Grawp 23:38, 27 April 2008 (CDT)
  • impressive. --yirimyah ♠ æ 05:27, 3 May 2008 (CDT)

Uncyclopedia work: Grawp, Vandalrenamed (used to be Az1568), HAGGER?, Grawp the Giant, and Grawp the Jolly Giant. — Grawp 03:43, 1 May 2008 (CDT)

Moar French: [4]. — Grawp 03:57, 31 May 2008 (CDT)

D:

It turns out that Urban Rose is actually a Young Earth creationist [6]. What? --lateral |talk| 18:26, 27 April 2008 (CDT)

  • I see from her talk page that she's sort of, but not really since they're all carebears, getting ripped a new one for her faggotry. I guess she can't handle not being the center of attention now that they aren't allowed to mention Grawp by name. White•Mystery
    • It’s kinda funny ’cause their not mentioning me by name just makes me wanna vandalize even more. — Grawp 23:48, 27 April 2008 (CDT)
  • They seem to think that hardcoding your signature words into the spam blacklist is going to do anything. They're actually dumber than I previously realized. White•Mystery
The train of lulz generated by Grawp seems to be running out of steam right now. Maybe we should start a seperate Urban Rose article?--ByAppointmentTo 04:01, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
No I'm not a young earth creationist. I just believe that alternative theorys regarding earth's age and origin deserve mention of some form or another in articles like Earth because Wikipedia isn't supposed to censor the fact that other views exist. If you're going to write an article about me, at least get your facts straight. And also, why I know there is nothing I can do about this since I released my image into the public domain, I would appreciate it if that pic of me was removed.--UR 10:07, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
You know, Urban Rose, you actually seem like a decent human being. (Please also note that this website is about crude satire and the absolute freedom of speech.) It is not a hate site or a vandalism planning site. Your problem is that you are contributing to Wikipedia. WP is a dangerous cult like Scientology; it fleeces its members of their money (donations) and wastes large amounts of their time (rollbacking schoolkids making IP edits for hours on end), and for what purpose? None. There is no benefit from editing Wikipedia. You are a slave when editing WP, doing hard work without getting any pay. Don't believe me? Check out Wikipedia Review. I would recommend that you and other editors quit Wikipedia for their own good, but it's your own decision. Eventually, you may come to realise that I am right. There's a reason that admins are leaving Wikipedia at a greater rate than ever before - Wikipedia brainwashes you to think that it is a good thing to contribute to, when in reality the end result is that many people end up leaving because they become so frustrated with it. The whole propaganda machine with that Jimbo Wales donation pledge video last year about the way that editing Wikipedia is 'moral' and benefits 'the child in Africa' is utter, utter bullshit - to continue to edit after Jimbo spent Wikimedia Foundation donations on hookers in Moscow is just incredibly naive.
I myself have never vandalised Wikipedia - in fact, I used to edit constructively, before I saw that the whole thing was a sham.
As for the picture, I could delete it. How much do you want me to?--ByAppointmentTo 11:18, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
I agree that Wikipedia is far from perfect but I don't think of it as an absolute failure either. It may never be like Britannica in terms of scholarly merit, but it serves as a great knowledge base for information on virtually any subject. And assuming that Wikipedia is an absolute failure, I don't understand why you help people like Grawp vandalize then by creating accounts for him. If it's a failure, then just let it fail. No need to trample on it's grave. As for the image, I really don't care at this point and I'm not going to do anything for you to get you to remove it (but I'm still willing to hear your proposal). If you won't remove it on you own, then that's fine. But actually I would like to hear about the "hookers in Moscow" story. Do you have a link to it?--UR 11:51, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
Here's the link - please tell me what you think of it. I agree that Wikipedia, as it stands, is a decent knowledge base, but that's no reason to contribute to it. I have more of a problem with how it operates than the actual content. Abusive admins, the propaganda used in recruiting new users, etcetera. The fact is that if you were to agree with me on this page that Jimbo's actions were abusive, that would negatively affect any future RfA you participated in (personally, if it wasn't for the recent trouble over the young earth creationism issue, I think if you went to RfA you'd probably pass right now). Read that Wikipedia Review thread and honestly try to tell me that Wikipedia is not a dangerous cult - there is an emotional atmosphere surrounding all major issues that has turned rotten, with major issues of distrust everywhere - Wikipedians literally cannot take criticism, because they cite WP:NPA.--ByAppointmentTo 12:08, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
The things is, corrupt administration aside, a lot of the problems you mention are problems with wikis in general, not just Wikipedia (e.g. vandalism, no pay). I don't see why contributing to Wikipedia is any more pointless than contributing to a site like this other than your allegations of a corrupt administration (some of which apparently have truth to them). --UR 13:13, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
This is fun to contribute to. You'd have to be a masochist to enjoy contributing to Wikipedia as it is these days.-ByAppointmentTo 13:15, 28 April 2008 (CDT)

If User:Headstrust/Grawp isn't the real Grawp

Just some friendly advice, if I were him, I would stop claiming to be the real Grawp, as I have already contacted a certain user requesting that we be given access to his IP addresses. We already know the IP range that he operates from, and once this user responds, we will be able to track him down from any given edit and possibly get his ISP to take action against him, or possibly even get legal action to be taken against him if we can find out who he is. So if this user isn't the original Grawp (and I have my suspicions that he is really just some other nobody who saw this page and thought that claiming to be the real Grawp would be a way to create a name for himself), I suggest that he find another vandal to imitate, or for that matter get a real life and find a hobby other than vandalizing Wikipedia. And the same goes to all of those users who create accounts for him. Namely, get a life and be above lowering youselves to the position of this loser's personal lackeys. Find something better to do with your time.--UR 10:30, 28 April 2008 (CDT)

  • Fuck you, you stupid bitch. Nobody from this site is going to give out his IP. You come here making demands because you can get away with it on wikipedia, but you can go get fucked if you're going to try to pull that shit here. White•Mystery
I didn't request someone from this site to give out his IP. We already have his IP. I requested permission from a Wikipedia user who decides if we are allowed access to others IPs to make Grawp's IP public so that we can get his ISP to take action. As Grawp hit my userpage again today with another round of socks, I think it's fair to warn him what we're capable of.--UR 13:06, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
  • Your tactics are very scary. Someone hold me! Jesuitx 13:16, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
  • What makes you think you're capable of finding his real IP or that it would make any difference in the long run? Grawp may have started off as a person, but he's evolved into an idea. You should look at the root cause of why people want to do this sort of thing instead of just sweeping the symptoms under the carpet. Things like adding variations on HAGGER?? to the spam blacklist and thinking that it will do anything is one such example. Coming here and making threats is going to gain you zero ground and will only paint a bigger target on you and wikipedia. Also, and I'm just going out on a limb here - but maybe your userpage wouldn't get so much if you weren't such a cunt? White•Mystery
How does wanting to prevent Wikipedia from being vandalized make me a cunt? I've never had anything personally against him. To me he's just another petty vandal. The only reason that Grawp vandalizes my page is because I'm opposed to his vandalism. Yet somehow when I try to make this anonymous coward accountable for his actions, I turn in to some kind of bully. I frankly don't get your reasoning.--UR 14:16, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
[after a hail of bannings doesn't stop Grawp]
Jéské Couriano: Ban! Ban! Why won't you be banned?... Why won't you be banned?
Grawp: Beneath this username there is more than flesh. Beneath this sock puppet there is an idea, Mr. Couriano, and ideas are banproof. --lateral |talk| 17:23, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
Source of that quote please?--ByAppointmentTo 17:30, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
I was just paraphrasing V for Vendetta. --lateral |talk| 17:32, 28 April 2008 (CDT)

"(and I have my suspicions that he is really just some other nobody who saw this page and thought that claiming to be the real Grawp would be a way to create a name for himself)" and what name could this person "hope to create for himself?" The name Gwarp? Do you actually think about the shit you say, or do you just copy it out of your family bible? -§a¡n† S¡†hney 03:48, 3 May 2008 (CDT)
Banhammer anyone? she is clearly an enemy of lulz. Albertluque 15:55, 28 April 2008 (CDT)

Unless she vandalises, I have no need to block her.--ByAppointmentTo 15:57, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
Don't worry, I won't vandalize. But I don't think that by siding with Grawp you people are doing much for the reputation of this website. This site has a rep as a "Wikipedia hate site" and you're just adding to it.--UR 16:51, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
  • I'd hate to ruin our standing in the Wikipedia community given our fantastic track record. Do you think if we took down the Grawp page we could get an article on ED that stays up for more than five minutes, or do we walk the tightrope of "not notable enough for a TOW article but notable enough that a TOW admin is bothered by a page on here?" You'll have to excuse us for not siding with the third reich of websites on this one. White•Mystery
  • Just wanting to contribute, because I hate TOW more than foreigners, but you'd think that after all this time you fifty-cent pig-fuckers over at the Jimbo Wales All-Singing All-Dancing Clusterfuck and Pedo Extravaganza would have realised by now that as a rule ED pisses on your social-feedback club for Internet-aspergers and transexual kiddy-touchers? No? Hasn't sunk in yet? Can't quite grasp the concept yet? Don't know how ED actually got started, the idea is beyond your cultist mindset? Go fuck yourself with a roughly shaped object? And post tits? Because I have seen that photo of yours and am currently typing this with my penis because of it? You sound offended that the very name of TOW doesn't make people fall to their knees in awe. wingsnugs --WKD 00:41, 30 April 2008 (CDT)
  • wat you're not even an admin? Go piss up a flagpole. White•Mystery
  • Urban Rose, if you're not an admin why do you even give a shit. As just a regular user they'd sell you out in a heartbeat. Don't be taking bullets for these people, they'll eat you up, spit you out, and never even say thank you. Also Grawp has Sceptre shitting bricks right now. --lateral |talk| 17:32, 28 April 2008 (CDT)
  • That is fucking awesome. --WKD 00:41, 30 April 2008 (CDT)
  • Scepter is a whiney little faggot. Who gave a 13 year old kid sysop? (lol aside from Pokchu XD) --Drunkenlazybastard 13:30, 30 April 2008 (CDT)

Impersonators

Lol, who did this, this, this, this, and this? — Grawp 03:08, 29 April 2008 (CDT)

Not me. It seems that your vandalism is now a "meme" in and of itself, and this ED page is helping to propagate it.--ByAppointmentTo 04:32, 29 April 2008 (CDT)
  • Fuck! What will this do to our reputation in the Wikipedia community?! White•Mystery

LOL, Silly Germans

I just moved sixty-one articles over at the German Wikipedia.[7]. — Grawp 22:17, 29 April 2008 (CDT)

  • You are a funny funny man. Don't ever change :) --Drunkenlazybastard 22:35, 29 April 2008 (CDT)

Lol, Titleblacklist drama: [8]. — Grawp 22:43, 29 April 2008 (CDT)

 
“ 		 
Why, when you find a name in wikipedia (Phillip Pendal, a Western Australian politician) that doesn't have a page, and you spend ages creating a page, does everything disappear when you click on Show Preview. There was a message about a blacklist - why didn't that message come up when I clicked on the link to create the page? Why has all the data that I typed in disappeared before I could have saved it somewhere? Infuriating.
  		„
 

—Hamiltonraja

 
“ 		 
If your browser supports it, using the back key should bring up the page with all the text you wrote still there
  		„
 

—rakkar

 
“ 		 
Please see the section below.
  		„
 

—Nakon

 
“ 		 
The Back key didn't bring back the data, it's lost and can stay lost. What on earth does a message like "Please see the section below. Nakon 13:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)" mean?
  		„
 

—Hamiltonraja

 
“ 		 
It means please look below to the post "This was a temporary software glitch, caused by the page name blacklist not working in the way I expected. I've now reverted the change. Please let me know if this recurs: it should now be unblocked." Nakon is the name that he/she edits under, just like yours is Hamiltonraja.
  		„
 

—Woody

— Grawp 22:51, 29 April 2008 (CDT)

Just moved about thirty-five articles at the Chinese Wikipedia. [9] — Grawp 23:58, 29 April 2008 (CDT)

  • Lol, silly Chinese: [10]. — Grawp 00:02, 30 April 2008 (CDT)

And Meta: [11]. — Grawp 00:54, 30 April 2008 (CDT)

  • You should move the article on Tibet to the article about freedom. (if chinks have it that is XD) --Drunkenlazybastard 00:55, 30 April 2008 (CDT)

You know what? I quit.

I've had enough of this nonsense that is vandalism reversion. Wikipedia should just find some way to get rid of vandalism permanently. It shouldn't be my job to spend countless hours reverting school kid's edits on articles that I didn't write and filing abuse reports on people for moving pages to "HAGGER??" and what not. It's pointless. You people are right about Wikipedia and I'd almost rather contribute here than I would there for another second. Peace.--UR 11:35, 30 April 2008 (CDT)

Well done, she finally sees sense, that's what we've been telling you now since you've done the right thing someone can take that massive table down from your userpage. Albertluque 13:08, 30 April 2008 (CDT)

I'm glad you've seen the light. I think I will remove the pics of you, and make ED sympathetic towards you, because you're smart enough to think for yourself. Spending time reverting vandalism is voluntarily admitting yourself into slavery. The dogma behind the "anyone can edit this page" without registration is sickening. In the meantime, join Wikipedia Review and make your criticisms known. As I said before, UR, I can see you're a good person.--ByAppointmentTo 13:17, 30 April 2008 (CDT)
I mentioned you here originally for your own good, UR. Altruism? In my Encyclopedia Dramatica? It's more likely than you think.--ByAppointmentTo 14:20, 30 April 2008 (CDT)
Actually now that I think about it, I don't mind the pictures too much. I find them kind of funny. I'm more concerned about my personal information, but by now Grawp has probably spread it throughout 4chan or wherever. If you could restore my user and talk pages though, I would appreciate it.--UR 16:01, 30 April 2008 (CDT)
I deleted your user page and user talk page, and they're free for editing.--ByAppointmentTo 16:09, 30 April 2008 (CDT)
Thanks. You may consider taking a look at the manifesto I've written on my userpage.--UR 17:00, 30 April 2008 (CDT)
You might also consider reading my latest my post on WP:AN.--UR 17:39, 30 April 2008 (CDT)
Hahah, you do know that by telling them you have an account on ED you are dead to them right? --Drunkenlazybastard 17:54, 30 April 2008 (CDT)
Fine by me. Maybe once they discover that legitimate editors are realizing that they might as well be editing ED than spending hours a day reverting vandalism by schoolkids, sociopaths, and autistics they'll realize that something about Wikipedia needs to change.--UR 18:04, 30 April 2008 (CDT)
  • So you figured you'd quit the schoolkids and autistics and stick with the sociopaths?--WKD 23:48, 30 April 2008 (CDT)

Lol MediaWiki Titleblacklist

Everyone except TOW admins are now unable to create titles with even a normal space in them. — Grawp 02:00, 1 May 2008 (CDT)

Oh lawd: [12]. — Grawp 02:19, 1 May 2008 (CDT)

Alright here are the archives: here and here (for the second one, click on the “Show” off to the right of “Threads about errors.” — Grawp 20:57, 3 May 2008 (CDT)

Grawpie, was this you?

HAGGER? seems to be influencing everyone, everywhere.--ByAppointmentTo 15:39, 3 May 2008 (CDT)

Lol, Barbara Bauer censorship

Slow administrators are slow. Also, see this, this, this, this, this, and this. I did some other stuff with another account at the same time, but I won’t link to it because I don’t want the revisions to be deleted. — Grawp 22:03, 3 May 2008 (EDT)

Also, Misza13 (BTW, is this guy Curps in disguise?)’s shitty bot can’t even touch me, but it still manages to cause drama [13]. — Grawp 22:03, 3 May 2008 (CDT)

Okay, guys, I need help. Please go to http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&action=edit and replace the entire page with “Barbara Bauer is a stupid, evil bitch trying to sue Wikipedia for telling the truth about her. Also, the Wikimedia Foundation is giving in to her by deleting all information regarding her because they are pathetic wimps who delight in censorship.” Also, be sure to copy “[[Barbara Bauer is a stupid, evil bitch trying to sue Wikipedia for telling the truth about her. Also, the WMF is giving in to her because they are pathetic wimps who delight in censorship.]]” into the edit summary field (linked because this will make the edit summary red). I already did it myself with the account Barbara Bauer (which will be renamed soon), but it was oversighted. Do it to as many other pages as possible before being blocked. Do it for the lulz. Do it for justice. Do it for drama. — Grawp 01:20, 4 May 2008 (CDT)

Why don't we just post an ED article about it here so they can't do anything about it? Albertluque 11:22, 4 May 2008 (CDT)

  • Yeah, that’s what I was thinking, but then again, the ED Powers That Be wouldn’t allow an article on Giovanni di Stefano. — Grawp 20:57, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
  • Giovanni is a little different. He has more money than fucking god and is even more batshit insane to boot. --Drunkenlazybastard 20:46, 12 May 2008 (CDT)

GNAA site

Just to clear things up about the GNAA site: an accurate description of what it does in IE is here—far better than what it does to Firefox, in my opinion. “If you visit that site your browser will be hijacked and a loud ‘hey guys I am watching gay porn’ will come through your speakers. Your browser will jump around—the only way to stop it is to kill the process.”

In Firefox, all it does is open about thirty new Firefox windows in rapid succession (within about five seconds), then new windows start to open at a much slower rate. I don’t even recall being able to see what the site looks like in Firefox, but in IE, it shows some nude black shemale with shit smeared over it and the words “GNAA” and some of their slogans in the background or something like that. Also, there’s that hilarious “Hey guys, I am watching gay porn!” that blares from the speakers if you go there with IE. I saw some comment from a Wikipedo that all it does in Opera is crash it without really loading anything.

Also, after I went there in IE, my Firewall detected a Trojan; I think that’s what causes the browser window to jiggle around because that’s what its name hinted at. — Grawp 13:01, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

Check out this hilarity: [14]. — Grawp 23:43, 6 June 2008 (CDT)

I lol'd heartily --Drunkenlazybastard 00:28, 7 June 2008 (CDT)

LOL, AND AGAIN![15] Fuck Misza13’s blocking bot; I’m never gonna stop linking to that site. — Grawp 17:28, 8 June 2008 (CDT)

Knock it off

My Wikipedia userpage was just vandalized again. Listen Grawp, if it was you or your 4chan pals, I gave up on RC patrol and trying to hunt guys like you down a while ago, so there's no reason to have hard feelings. If you're trying to get revenge, that's just stupid. You go your way, and I'll go mine. I really don't care if you vandalize anymore, as after this whole ED issue is resolved (I think I owe ED a favor for helping me to realize how much of my time I was wasting) I'll probably go on a semi-permenant Wikibreak. So please, no more vandalizing my userpage, posting links to vandalized revisions of my page on 4chan, or whatever it is that you do, okay? Thanks.--UR 21:47, 10 May 2008 (EDT)

Not me except this one, which I did because some adminfag deleted my previous one from the page history. — Grawp 20:43, 12 May 2008 (CDT)

Newfag

Okay, this guy is making me look like a fag. Whoever is BhaggoM, Quaffed, Red Burn Flicker, Retsilteop, Saturday's Loss, SnuffleIsoceles, and Thick Smog, AT LEAST INCLUDE THE LINK TO NIMP.ORG! — Grawp 20:39, 12 May 2008 (CDT)

  • Lawlz, I just saw this picture, so I guess ByAppointmentTo’s behind this like he was some of the Brian Peppers moves. — Grawp 22:42, 12 May 2008 (CDT)
  • Yeah, actually, all of them except Retsilteop were me. A lot of the Grawp style page moves without the link to nimp.org are actually me, and the ones about Brian Peppers on wheels were also me. I still have a shitload of sockpuppets.--ByAppointmentTo 03:18, 13 May 2008 (CDT)
  • Oh and Grawp, reply to my fucking emails.--ByAppointmentTo 03:25, 13 May 2008 (CDT)

Jenna Bush and HAGER????

Henry HAGER???
Henry HAGER???

--Image:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifOldDirtyBtardImage:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gifImage:Littlemudkip.gif • WUT? 20:54, 12 May 2008 (CDT)

Sweet, I’ll move this dude’s article in a few hours. — Grawp 22:29, 12 May 2008 (CDT)
She looks just like her dad. She has a nigra nose, doesn't she? She has monkey-like facial features.--ByAppointmentTo 03:22, 13 May 2008 (CDT)

Epic Faggotry

Oh lawd, check out this faggotry: [16]. — Grawp 01:06, 14 May 2008 (CDT)

Wikia Campaign

Oh noes, vandal lockdown! Lol, I got two images of gore on the main page. Too bad I didn’t have enough time to screenshot it. Now those images are protected.… — Grawp 01:46, 15 May 2008 (CDT)

Ah, I remember the good ol’ days when I royally screwed up Fred Bauder’s Water Wiki.… — Grawp 01:48, 15 May 2008 (CDT)

Oh, here it is. — Grawp 01:51, 15 May 2008 (CDT)

Is it just me, or does Wikia not load on Internet Explorer? I can only load Wikia pages on Firefox now. — Grawp 22:07, 4 June 2008 (CDT)

Has the autoconfirmed level been changed already?

I have an account that was registered in 2007 ready and I can't edit semiprotected pages or move pages.--To / Appointment / By 09:24, 22 May 2008 (CDT)

Lol, yes. Your account still has to be only four days old, but now it has to have ten edits anywhere (edits to articles not required).[17] — Grawp 14:22, 22 May 2008 (CDT)
You can just make 10 edits to your userpage. What difference is that gonna make?--To / Appointment / By 05:07, 23 May 2008 (CDT)


If they delete your userpage, make 10 sandbox edits. That won't get deleted cuz it'll crash their servers. Ritegroic 08:46, 24 May 2008 (CDT)

  • Why would they delete my user page without blocking me? — Grawp 23:01, 24 May 2008 (CDT)

I lol'd so hard

at the "Captain HAGGER" thing, see change at the top of the article.--To / Appointment / By 06:45, 24 May 2008 (CDT)

They took fucking ages to block me this time

Check this: contribs.--To / Appointment / By 12:14, 26 May 2008 (CDT)

Epic fail this time though.-To / Appointment / By 12:44, 26 May 2008 (CDT)
MOAR EPIC WIN... what do you think then Grawp? Doing it right?-To / Appointment / By 04:50, 27 May 2008 (CDT)
lol did it again-To / Appointment / By 05:42, 27 May 2008 (CDT)
This time there was so much win that I have truly eclipsed all pagemove vandalism that has ever been done before.--To / Appointment / By 06:37, 27 May 2008 (CDT)
and yet again--To / Appointment / By 12:11, 27 May 2008 (CDT)
And they wonder why Wikipedia is running much more slowly than ED right now...-To / Appointment / By 12:56, 27 May 2008 (CDT)

I did the same thing you did, but they blocked me very quickly: [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. — Grawp 20:39, 27 May 2008 (CDT)

  • You have to wait for Nakon to go offline. Is he using an adminbot or just some lame ass IRC feed? Also Panic at the ANI --lateral |talk| 21:03, 27 May 2008 (CDT)
    • It’s an adminbot, and she’s always online. — Grawp 03:38, 28 May 2008 (CDT)
      • If we have anyone with Checkuser privs at Wikipedia, it might be advisable to DOS adminbots. I bet half of them are just running off someone's home connection and machine, and we'd only need them down for a few minutes. --yirimyah ♠ æ 03:54, 9 June 2008 (CDT)

Censorship faggot

Just look at this epic faggotry: [24]. — Grawp 21:07, 26 May 2008 (CDT)

Misza13

This retard appears to have installed "another" admin bot that immediatly blocks Grawp socks seconds after they move a page resulting in them being blocked after just one move, is there anything you could do to get round this or anything we could do to get back on him? Because I really can't stand the prick, he's a right dickhead when I've been on IRC. Albertluque 03:45, 28 May 2008 (CDT)

He and Nakon are using the same script as Curps’s notorious blocking-because-of-page-moves bot. It’s triggered by my page move edit summaries, as well as the titles I move the pages to. Seems the only way to get around this problem is to simply create more accounts. — Grawp 03:55, 28 May 2008 (CDT)

Dude, how the hell are you getting accounts from as far back as mid-2006?

Just wondering.--To / Appointment / By 17:07, 29 May 2008 (CDT)

I find your Wikipedia vandalism fucking hilarious though. I notice that sometimes your techniques have started copying me (like using the Template:Userpage template ten times, and using edit summaries that look legitimate to your average Wikipedo so that moar pages can be moved), after I started copying you.--To / Appointment / By 17:19, 29 May 2008 (CDT)
That faggot Acalamari needs moar article here on ED, too.--To / Appointment / By 17:26, 29 May 2008 (CDT)

Because I created them then. Like I mentioned in this article, I first started editing Wikipedia in January 2005. Had to do some searching in Wikipedia and my memory to find them. I even found a few that I know I created, but I can’t log in to them for some reason.

Can’t just start editing my user pages ten times in a row, though, because I did that yesterday with two of my accounts, and they got suspicious, did a secret checkuser mission via IRC, and ended up blocking five of my accounts right before I was about to move a bunch of pages. BTW, you have any more accounts for me? — Grawp 23:54, 29 May 2008 (CDT)

I have got around 50 accounts, and I'm registering more every day. Thing is, what I plan to do is register many every day then wait until the checkuser logs make it impossible to detect the other accounts registered from that IP (which could be like 5-6 months), then I would have so many accounts that they would just be throwaway.--To / Appointment / By 04:25, 30 May 2008 (CDT)
  • ByAppointmentTo, is this you? — Grawp 19:06, 30 May 2008 (CDT)

Like this one from October 2005. — Grawp 19:49, 30 May 2008 (CDT)

No, that's not me. I assumed that was you.--To / Appointment / By 05:11, 2 June 2008 (CDT)
The Wikipedia link is me; I meant the IRC stuff, just for clarification. — Grawp 13:43, 3 June 2008 (CDT)

Bot capable of reverting mass page-moves?

Check this: Fucking faggot.

But I believe that Grawp cannot be stopped that easily. I'm sure you'll astound us all with new and amazing ways to pwn Wikipedia.--To / Appointment / By 17:45, 29 May 2008 (CDT)

  • Meh, that bot’s just redundant. Nakon, Misza13, and Persian Poet Gal already have bots doing that. — Grawp 23:45, 29 May 2008 (CDT)

Lulz E-mail

Here’s two e-mails I got from some guy who’s obsessed with Persian Poet Gal. Probably this guy, as they both have shitty grammar.

 
“ 		 
Persian Poet Gal,
Thats all i need to say i think. Have you got a pic of her like you have with Urban Rose? Forget about how shes got you covered everytime you make a page move now but you gotta admit this is one fine girl you would want to get a pic of. I need your help, what are my options? I know you have done her page but now she has move sysoped it so thats out of the question. Cmon, no one can stop Grawp which is why i am asking you this. I need to find a way. What do ya think?

Can you try something?
 

„
 

Being the nice guy that I am, I tried to help him out: [25].

 
“ 		 
Like your message that you gave to the poet gal, its a shame though i dont think she read one word and reverted it straight away. seriously was it absolutely necessary to call out bitch as the header, i mean once she saw that it was over. do you not have any common sense? saying love at the end of it is not going to cut it, you can do better than that. i hope you wont stop because your not the only one who wants to see a pic of her.
  		„
 

— Grawp 04:22, 30 May 2008 (CDT)

lulz, creepy. --lateral |talk| 15:03, 30 May 2008 (CDT)

So, he’s from Pyrmont, New South Wales, Ausfailia.[26] — Grawp 02:19, 15 June 2008 (CDT)

Holy shit, I made a bug in the Matrix.

Check out this. — Grawp 19:53, 30 May 2008 (CDT)

I came. --Drunkenlazybastard 21:09, 30 May 2008 (CDT)

Wikipedo IRC

It’s interesting how conversation about me transforms into discussion about British monarchy and whatnot.[27] — Grawp 21:51, 30 May 2008 (CDT)

Is it you who keeps coming on IRC as "Grawp" and trolling? Albertluque 05:36, 31 May 2008 (CDT)

  • No, that’s probably BAT. I rarely ever use IRC. — Grawp 20:59, 31 May 2008 (CDT)
  • It's not me, either. I have never used IRC.--To / Appointment / By 06:08, 1 June 2008 (CDT)

HAGGER The Horrible?

Lol, a great pagemove target for Grawp.--To / Appointment / By 07:00, 31 May 2008 (CDT)

we're being watched, they've protected it from pagemoves before Grawp even did anything! email him next time! Albertluque 15:53, 31 May 2008 (CDT)

  • God damnit, I was already thinking of moving it before you posted it here. — Grawp 21:00, 31 May 2008 (CDT)
  • That fucking bastard Lucasbfr is the next one to get his own article written by me, after the recent Acalamari.--To / Appointment / By 05:03, 1 June 2008 (CDT)

Now that IS annoying. Albertluque 01:58, 2 June 2008 (CDT)

Alison just decimated my accounts

  1. 18:25, 1 June 2008 Alison (Talk | contribs) blocked "ImportantYears (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (Abusing multiple accounts: Grawp )
  2. 18:25, 1 June 2008 Alison (Talk | contribs) blocked "Scintillating Applicant (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (Abusing multiple accounts: Grawp )
  3. 18:24, 1 June 2008 Alison (Talk | contribs) blocked "'Peste' means fish. (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (Abusing multiple accounts: Grawp )
  4. 18:24, 1 June 2008 Alison (Talk | contribs) blocked "Percolation Gyroscope (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (Abusing multiple accounts: Grawp )
  5. 18:23, 1 June 2008 Alison (Talk | contribs) blocked "Les pouissons sont mort dans la mer. (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (Abusing multiple accounts: Grawp )
  6. 18:23, 1 June 2008 Alison (Talk | contribs) blocked "Postulated Permafrost (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (Abusing multiple accounts: Grawp )
  7. 18:23, 1 June 2008 Alison (Talk | contribs) blocked "Mmm, tripe is yummy. (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite ‎ (Abusing multiple accounts: Grawp )
  8. 18:23, 1 June 2008 Alison (Talk | contribs) blocked "Doo-Wop Master 9001 (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite