Talk:Heterosexual
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
What does it say about our userbase that it took five months for this article to appear?--hardvice
- I don't know - ostensibly the same conclusion we're meant to come to about Cunnilingus (As noted in the first draft) --無 & Ghostlight 12:21, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
That you suck cock? --Alexjon 06:21, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Interesting conclusion. Are you sure you're not njyoder? Gerbilsage 12:07, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This article rocks socks. Gerbilsage 12:07, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
[edit] POV Issues? In MY vagina?
If you're actually concerned about POV issues, I think you have the wrong Wiki.--Poko_fister (talk) 00:01, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
[edit] A Different Approach?
ED makes fun of everything - we have shitloads of articles about homos and we take the piss out of breeders to even things out. Fair enough.
Wouldn't it be funnier to change a few articles (heterosexual, white people, men etc.) saying that they are superior to women, blacks, gays etc. and sadly Hitler's noble plan was never completed? It's far moar liekly to piss people off. --MudkipsPlz 06:48, 23 July 2008 (CDT)
Except that it wouldn't be funny though, would it - it would just make you look like a douchebag instead. A butthurt douchebag at that... --Badnewswade2 21:45, 7 September 2008 (CDT)
- It took you 5 edits to say that? -Lolinnernets
- Fuck you, it's a medical condition :-p
- Fuck you, it's a medical condition :-p
☎ 22:25, 7 September 2008 (CDT)
- Ow.
