Talk:Intelligence
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
How about an example? --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 22:58, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Is that all we need to de-crap it? --Lucky Pierre QD 05:21, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Despite its brevity, this article is crap on several different levels. It needs to be completely rewritten as well as being expanded. For a start, why is Princeton University's definition relevant and how can an entire university be credited with a single definition of a word? Is it an appropriate definition in this context? What LJ users have used the word "intelligent" to describe themselves? Are there humorous incidents where such claims have been disproven? Who cares? Where are the lulz? Why is the article titled with the adjective "intelligent" and not a noun (i.e., "intelligence") as would usually be expected? Numerous other questions could be raised - though, of course, the lulz question is the big one. This article needs more work than I would care to attempt. In conclusion, it's crap. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 05:57, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- So fuck it, let's just delete. --Lucky Pierre QD 17:12, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- It shouldn't be deleted, because too many things link to it. I'll try and do a proper re-write later... --Mister Six 13:01, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I must've been really fucking drunk when I wrote that... in a bad way.. o_O ~ Banaan 16:33, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- It shouldn't be deleted, because too many things link to it. I'll try and do a proper re-write later... --Mister Six 13:01, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- So fuck it, let's just delete. --Lucky Pierre QD 17:12, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Despite its brevity, this article is crap on several different levels. It needs to be completely rewritten as well as being expanded. For a start, why is Princeton University's definition relevant and how can an entire university be credited with a single definition of a word? Is it an appropriate definition in this context? What LJ users have used the word "intelligent" to describe themselves? Are there humorous incidents where such claims have been disproven? Who cares? Where are the lulz? Why is the article titled with the adjective "intelligent" and not a noun (i.e., "intelligence") as would usually be expected? Numerous other questions could be raised - though, of course, the lulz question is the big one. This article needs more work than I would care to attempt. In conclusion, it's crap. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 05:57, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
