WE MADE IT TO THE FINALS! NOW WE NEED YOUR VOTES MORE THAN EVER!!!Encyclopedia Dramatica is in contention for the 2nd Annual Mashable Open Web Awards for the wiki category. With your help, we can beat the Wikipedia menace! Plz vote for ED by going here; you can vote once per day, per email address, ballot stuffing encouraged! Just don't forget to confirm the vote via e-mail. VOTE OR DIE!!!
Talk:Ladder Theory
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
I love the Ladder Theory. I swear I'll rewrite this one day. ~ Krade hi yo~ 00:35, 2 Mar 2006 (UTC)
- This does not need to be rewritten. --Bastardman 15:19, 2 Mar 2006 (UTC)
I challenge you to rewrite this article, since the depiction of ladder theory is completely orthogonal to the theory itself. I think that it should deserve a response, which is more conforming categorically and textually. ~ AlfredRosenberg 12:27, 2 Mar 2006 (GMT)
- Welcome to Encyclopaedia Dramatica, home of parody and internets drama. ~ CATS 11:43, 2 Mar 2006 (UTC)
- I see the point which you are trying to make, and I fully acknowledge it. Furthermore, I claim that this very requirement on articles in the ed requires the article to be rewritten, since it is not a satire or parody at all. It is a mere rant, which could equally apply to anything else. If it ought to be called a satire, it should be more specific. I therefore tried to give it a better representation. ~ AlfredRosenberg 18:01, 2 Mar 2006 (GMT)
- Okay, maybe it does have a bit of a subjective tone, but it works. It's also a lot funnier than presenting the facts. Besides, we use POV here. --Bastardman 19:36, 2 Mar 2006 (UTC)
- I see the point which you are trying to make, and I fully acknowledge it. Furthermore, I claim that this very requirement on articles in the ed requires the article to be rewritten, since it is not a satire or parody at all. It is a mere rant, which could equally apply to anything else. If it ought to be called a satire, it should be more specific. I therefore tried to give it a better representation. ~ AlfredRosenberg 18:01, 2 Mar 2006 (GMT)
- Go back to TOW. --Bastardman 15:19, 2 Mar 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Crap
Marked as crap because there are no lulz in this article. Plz add lulz.--stufff 11:44, 21 September 2007 (CDT)
Fixed a bit. It now properly makes fun of the adherents of the thoery who will attempt to make this page into an ad.
