HELP ED WIN AN AWARD! Encyclopedia Dramatica is in contention for the 2nd Annual Mashable Open Web Awards for the wiki category. With your help, we can beat the Wikipedia menace! Plz vote for ED by going here; you can vote once per day, per email address, ballot stuffing encouraged! Just don't forget to confirm the vote via e-mail. VOTE OR DIE!!!

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Contents 1 Crap 2 TL:DR 3 Things I don't like about it 4 I tried to fix it 5 The Vandalism 6 Vagueness 7 Unfunny

[edit] Crap

Let's settle this: Yes this article is crap. I'm gonna tag it as such. watch.Youdontsmellbad 00:55, 20 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] TL:DR

This article is too long and so is this talk page. It (the article) should have everything that's not funny edited out, meaning almost everything.

This article is intensely annoying. --Bastardman 00:35, 21 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• I like it. Not crap. Prepare for wikiedit drama! ~ Krade ^{hi yo~} 03:16, 21 Jan 2006 (UTC)

The first article I've been puzzled by since lurking ED. No relation to the Internets, no lulz, tl;dr, reads like a butthurt rant full of unwarranted self-importance. I vote for deletion. --Vale 01:26, 20 March 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Things I don't like about it

1. Written in first person.
2. What's a quiz doing on ED?
3. Though it's apparently written by a guy, it reads like some angry dyke ranting and taking herself too seriously.

--Bastardman 03:38, 21 Jan 2006 (UTC)

1. Even with pictures it's tl;dr
2. It's not particularly funny
3. I am offended by the wanton use of vulgarities such as "pu55y" and "lick"

Plus what he said. --Ntg85 05:54, 21 Jan 2006 (UTC)

"# Though it's apparently written by a guy, it reads like some angry dyke ranting and taking herself too seriously."

I actually thought this was written by some butthurt dyke who wanted to speak out on ED. --Vale 01:23, 20 March 2008 (CDT)

[edit] I tried to fix it

It's probably still crap. Oh well.

lezbians r teh hawt!!! --PupilOfTruth 02:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Oh, so encyclopedia dramatica is based on truth now. My bad. No. I did not lose my password less than six hours after registering a new account... I just... randomly decided to make another one... yeah. That's it! --Ollie Garkey2.0 02:49, 31 March 2006 (UTC)]

[edit] The Vandalism

Any female can be a lesbian, it is not a disease or a mistake, or even a complex - 
it is part of who she is. There is no test or measure for lesbianism.

Did this dumb bitch even read the thing? -Mexican Pirate 20:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

• Probably not. We didn't even call lesbianism a disease or mistake. Silly lezzies. Quizzes are for bis.--Riboflavin 20:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vagueness

Erm... if this is for women only it should indicate that and if it is for men and women, it is totally fucking wrong.--FatesEnd 22:23, 1 January 2008 (CST)

[edit] Unfunny

This article is, most indeed, crap. It completely lacks lulz, and it makes absolutely no sense - for ED, I mean. It might go good on some amateur sexual identity discussion site. ~ForAFlick 00:04, 01 Feb 2008 (CST)

Seconded. There are no lulz to be had, and furthermore it looks like something EDiots would troll. WTF? --Vale 01:14, 20 March 2008 (CDT)