BUY A SHIRT!
The ED TShirt Shop is open for business! Use discount code ED2009 for 10% off! Click here to shop. ED5 Pollfest is going on now! Register a forums accounts and help us find the best article in the five year history of Encyclopedia Dramatica. Check out the three polls running today: [1] [2] [3]

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Contents 1 Crap 2 TL:DR 3 Things I don't like about it 4 I tried to fix it 5 The Vandalism 6 Vagueness 7 Unfunny

Crap

Let's settle this: Yes this article is crap. I'm gonna tag it as such. watch.Youdontsmellbad 00:55, 20 April 2008 (CDT)

TL:DR

This article is too long and so is this talk page. It (the article) should have everything that's not funny edited out, meaning almost everything.

This article is intensely annoying. --Bastardman 00:35, 21 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• I like it. Not crap. Prepare for wikiedit drama! ~ Krade ^{hi yo~} 03:16, 21 Jan 2006 (UTC)

The first article I've been puzzled by since lurking ED. No relation to the Internets, no lulz, tl;dr, reads like a butthurt rant full of unwarranted self-importance. I vote for deletion. --Vale 01:26, 20 March 2008 (CDT)

Things I don't like about it

1. Written in first person.
2. What's a quiz doing on ED?
3. Though it's apparently written by a guy, it reads like some angry dyke ranting and taking herself too seriously.

--Bastardman 03:38, 21 Jan 2006 (UTC)

1. Even with pictures it's tl;dr
2. It's not particularly funny
3. I am offended by the wanton use of vulgarities such as "pu55y" and "lick"

Plus what he said. --Ntg85 05:54, 21 Jan 2006 (UTC)

"# Though it's apparently written by a guy, it reads like some angry dyke ranting and taking herself too seriously."

I actually thought this was written by some butthurt dyke who wanted to speak out on ED. --Vale 01:23, 20 March 2008 (CDT)

I tried to fix it

It's probably still crap. Oh well.

lezbians r teh hawt!!! --PupilOfTruth 02:07, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Oh, so encyclopedia dramatica is based on truth now. My bad. No. I did not lose my password less than six hours after registering a new account... I just... randomly decided to make another one... yeah. That's it! --Ollie Garkey2.0 02:49, 31 March 2006 (UTC)]

The Vandalism

Any female can be a lesbian, it is not a disease or a mistake, or even a complex - 
it is part of who she is. There is no test or measure for lesbianism.

Did this dumb bitch even read the thing? -Mexican Pirate 20:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

• Probably not. We didn't even call lesbianism a disease or mistake. Silly lezzies. Quizzes are for bis.--Riboflavin 20:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Vagueness

Erm... if this is for women only it should indicate that and if it is for men and women, it is totally fucking wrong.--FatesEnd 22:23, 1 January 2008 (CST)

Unfunny

This article is, most indeed, crap. It completely lacks lulz, and it makes absolutely no sense - for ED, I mean. It might go good on some amateur sexual identity discussion site. ~ForAFlick 00:04, 01 Feb 2008 (CST)

Seconded. There are no lulz to be had, and furthermore it looks like something EDiots would troll. WTF? --Vale 01:14, 20 March 2008 (CDT)