Talk:Nathanr/bureaucrat fuck
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Contents |
[edit] the nathanr emails
This all started because I congratulated Ryulong on banning Nathanr's cockpuppet. Many of these emails were also sent to the arbitration committee and Jimbo Wales.
[edit] 1
- Subject: Wikipedia e-mail
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 5:40 PM
Ryulong is wrong. I have nothing to do with that user whatsover - and awarding him anything for faulty logic is just wrong.
- Chris.
[edit] 2
- To: arbcom-l@wikimedia.org
- Subject: Appealing a block
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 1:15 PM
Hi,
I've been blocked on Wikipedia as "sockpuppet of a blocked user (Nathanrdotcom)".
I've been told to e-mail an ArbCom member. I'll go one better and mail the entire list.
I'd like to appeal this block as the "evidence" against me is
circumstantial at best. There is no solid evidence which links me to this user.
I'm willing to co-operate with any investigation that may result - including (if need be) opening an ArbCom case or RFC.
Thank you for your time.
User:Skult of Caro
I then posted nathanr's email publicly on Wikipedia and made this comment.
[edit] 3 (the drama begins)
- Subject: Are you on crack?
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 3:22 PM
I didn't "beat" my girlfriend. I hit her once out of anger. If you believe everything ED writes, then you have some serious issues. Try reading their page on Cyde or the one on Tony Sidaway and you'll see what I mean. I don't appreciate the baseless insults. You don't even know me and you have no right to comment on matters that you know nothing about.
The proof that Skult of Caro is me is circumstantial at best.
Remove my e-mail address from Ryulong's user talk. That's private information and I will appeal for its removal.
- Nathan
[edit] 4
- Subject: Wikipedia e-mail
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 3:34 PM
The fact that you believe anything that Encyclopedia Dramatica OR LJDrama says about me makes you one gullible motherfucker. Encyclopedia Dramatica was created by the same people who created LJDrama. Both have the words "drama" in their names - which means they delight in spreading (and exaggerating) the misfortunes of others. What I've REALLY done in the past is NOTHING LIKE what they've written.
They have pages on many notable Wikipedians, all lies and exaggerating the truth.
I don't feel the need to explain my past to you, but it's not what they publish and it's none of your business.
Forming an opinion on someone you don't know based on situations you know nothing about makes you gullible and naive. You know nothing about me, about my personal life, my relationship history..nothing.
I'd advise you to keep your mouth shut or I can track you down and charge you with defamation. What you have published on Ryulong's userpage is clearly defamation. Revert your edit RIGHT NOW and I won't seek action under the Arbcom and if necessary, the Foundation.
- Nathan
[edit] 5
- To: arbcom-l@wikimedia.org, jwales@wikia.com
- Subject: Defamation.
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 3:38 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ryulong&oldid=122846334#Skult_of_Caro
What Michael Linnear has said about me on this page is CLEAR defamation. I've "beat my girlfriend" (I don't quite understand how one action can somehow be imagined as many actions over time, which isn't the truth whatsoever)? I'm "petulant" and "a prima donna"?
He doesn't know me and has no right to say these damaging things about me. I remind you that anything you say on Wikipedia or any website whatsoever CAN have real-world consequences.
I demand that these questionable edits be reverted immediately or I will take this to the ArbCom, the Foundation, Jimbo and if necessary, defamation charges under a court of law.
I can and will track down Michael Linnear and charge him with defamation and Wikipedia, as a content provider, can and will be involved.
You're advised to remove those edits immediately and use Oversight to remove them completely from the history.
Thank you for your time, Nathan (User:nathanrdotcom)
[edit] 5
- Subject: Thanks
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 3:51 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ryulong&diff=122852067&oldid=122846334
Thanks. By that removal, you've proven that you have SOME sense, even though you still have bad judgement (believing everything ED/LJDrama spoon-feeds you without question).
I will still petition the ArbCom & oversights for complete removal of that edit - it is still defamation and while that edit remains on Wikipedia, you can and will be held accountable.
Perhaps now would be a good time for an apology to help smooth things over?
- Nathan
[edit] 5
- To: oversight-l@lists.wikimedia.org
- Subject: Removal of defamatory material
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 3:57 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ryulong&diff=122823775&oldid=122775576
This edit is defamatory and publishes private contact information without consent (regardless of whom it belongs to).
I request complete removal of this edit (reverting it is not enough, the edit still remains in the history) or Wikipedia and the editor involved can & will be held accountable for REAL WORLD consequences.
This person doesn't even know me and he has ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT to write what he did. "Beating his girlfriend"?? "petulant"? "a prima donna"?? What kind of nonsense is this? Let's be serious: This person doesn't even know me. He believes everything certain attack sites have written without question, proving himself to be very gullible and naive.
Regardless, that edit should not be on Wikipedia and I would very much appreciate its removal.
Thank you for your time, Nathan (User:nathanrdotcom)
[edit] My Reply at that point
- Subject: wikipedia
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 4:33 PM
Nathan,
Regarding your threat to track me down, I hope you will treat this matter as over and not pursue that. However I just read Wikipedia user The Halo's userpage, he states: I am leaving Wikipedia for an indefinite amount of time, after developments in my personal life, which relate to Wikipedia. After all the drama of the arbcom case, Nathanrdotcom has continued to contact me, recently wishing me and my sister dead, so I feel it best for both myself and the project if I lay low, and take some time away from Wikipedia. All the best until then, Thε Halo Θ 02:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
I am disturbed by your apparent malice towards this user, and I believe it will be for the best if you leave this matter be. Recall that it was you who started this situation by emailing me to complain about the barn star I gave Ryulong for his block of your sock puppet Skult of Caro.
I left you a message on Skult of Caro's user talk page:
Nathan, with all due respect, don't even bother. I can tell it's you just from your tone. There's a whole wide world outside of Wikipedia, it's time to move on. Honestly, it would be better for everyone. — MichaelLinnear 01:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
I hope you will take this to heart and stop treating the internet like such serious business.
[edit] 6
- Subject: Wikipedia
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 4:42 PM
I don't believe I'm going to read anything you send me. You're a very naive little man.
However, if you're willing to apologise for your defamatory comments, I'm willing to read it and possibly accept it - you need only give some indication to me that you're prepared to apologise, beyond that, everything of yours will be nuked on sight..
Besides that, I don't feel like reading any possible insults from you to add further insult to injury.
I reiterate: You have ABSOLUTELY NO RIGHT to post what you did. NONE WHATSOEVER. Exactly who the hell do you think you are?! You have NO RIGHT to pass judgement on someone you don't even know. The fact that you believe completely unsourced bullshit about me makes you stupid, gullible and naive, not to mention a complete moron.
Kindly piss off with your e-mails unless you're willing to see reason.
- Nathan
[edit] My reply at this point
- Subject: I'm sorry
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 4:59 PM
Actually not
Fuck off Nathanr
LJDrama and Ed were right about you
You are delusional.
You suck at making sockpuppets. (obviously)
You beat your girlfriend.
You are a pedophile.
You are a bully.
You feel big when you threaten children.
You need to try socializing with ADULTS your own age.
You will never get an apology.
I strongly recommend suicide.
[edit] His reply
- Subject: Re: I'm sorry
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 5:06 PM
For your stupidity, you've now been blacklisted.
I gave you one chance to apologise, that's all you get.
- Nathan
[edit] Next
Nathanr files an abuse report with AOL.
- To: abuse@aol.com
- Subject: HARASSMENT: I'm sorry (fwd)
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 5:06 PM
Please discipline your user, as his harassment will not be tolerated.
[edit] The End.
LOL. The Real Deal 02:18, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- You, sir, are a winnar. --Snarkymolarky 01:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nathanr's too stupid to write his own hate mail
Dear AOL User:
Greetings, you wanking troll. I know what you are thinking - "Oh no, it is someone from the net!!! He is gonna flame my sorry ass - I will have to narc on him to my TOSAdvisor cause my feelings are hurt!"
You should bow down and worship me for teaching you the ways of the InfoBahn. Please read this to the fullest extent possible ( I know that AOLers have reading impairments ) it will open your eyes to the world, and get your sorry asses out of the real net surfers hair.
For starters, please narc on me... AOL can't do a damn thing anyway. I, along with the world, are growing weary of all your worthless festering newbie net-garbage that seems to be floating around the net (especially in the ALT.SEX domain). Listen up troll:
STAY OFF THE NET (until you get a clue...)
If you had either a clue or a brain you wouldn't be on WOL (Wankers'OnLine). Spend you valuble time and hard earned money elsewhere... like buying keyboard skins, and anti-glare screens for your "spunk protection."
I am not your friend, or you pal. I, as a distinguished and civic minded citizen would like to do my duty to warn you that AOL poses legitimate health risks. You are suffering from the "Ten Free Hour Syndrome." I, along with many other net-vet's, know the tragic symptoms of this disorder. You probably will, or have had suffered from one or more of the following symptoms:
I.) MINDLESS CHAT: The second you throw that nicely colored WOL disk in,
============= and are granted access you will head straight (no pun intended) for the Gay & Lesbian Chat Rooms. (I understand that YOU aren't Gay, but your boyfriend is.) Here you talk with fellow trolls and beg for dirty pix.
II.) INTENSE DOWNLOADING: When you first download that first picture of a guy
=================== with a 14 inch schlong being sucked off by a 2 year old you will eventually come to what YOU think WOL and the net are made for -> your personal gallery of naughty pictures. It is here where you try to find FTP sites for pictures and TXT files (* Please See End *)
III.) WANKING: You probably do this about 20 times a day, anyway... but it gets
======= worse as you read and see the merits of digitized porn. You will ruin keyboards, chairs, monitors, fur coats, your mothers hair, your brothers face, and you fathers bunghole. Not to mention that you will forget how much of your 10 free hours is left. You will then be roped (literally) into WOL forever. You are probably wondering what WOL is... it is Wankers' OnLine of course!!
IV.) BLINDNESS: After Symptom III you WILL go blind after a while, and you won't
========= able to grab a pencil without rubbing off the paint. And your best friend will start to develop blisters, eventually falling off.
V.) GENDER LOSS: As months pass on WOL, not only will you be blind, but you
=========== will become a EUNICH!!!! You will end up raiding your mothers lingerie drawer with your crusty, scaly hands, and dress like a whore because you will suffer a gender identity crisis.
VI.) RIPPED OFF: Steve Case will get rich off you twice, which makes me extemely
========== ill. Not only does he bleed you dry with the cost of WOL, but he is exploiting your best friend cause he owns stock in the vaseline industy, and the Kleenex(R) Company.
Another little note. The all-time best way to get yourself flamed (probably the same reason that you got this) is to post "Me-Too" messages. These are usually found in responce to other "Me-Too" post by other AOLers. I will let you in on a little secret. YES!!, there are MANY FTP and WWW sites that have porn. Very many. And yes, there is a list that is circulated. BUT - > these sites are only distributed to a select few who have shown net-good-will. Basically when one AOLer gets a site, he tells all of his pre-pubscent friends about it, and the site shuts down to overload. I have seen MANY sites go down like this, that is why I am venting this anger. So, please do yourself a favor - wash your hands, be a good net citizen, and leave the net alone until you can behave appropriately.
Oh yes, please don't take this E-Mail as an insult. I am trying to enlighten you so that you don't make the same mistake again. Thanks for your time, oh yes... any and ALL responces that are malicious in nature will be forewarded to your leaders at WOL. These are:
SteveCase@AOL.COM TOSadvisor@AOL.COM TOS@AOL.COM Postmaster@AOL.COM
If you don't believe that it is possible for you to lose your access by sending a hate letter to a net-vet, just ask SavvyWaif@AOL.COM... he tried to phuck with me, now he isn't a member anymore
OMG Nathanr, you have me running scared now. A form letter about an ISP I don't use.
