Talk:Not4chan
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Contents |
Number 1!
We're the first result on Google for not4chan. Zenigata was pretty obvious while trolling this page before, while Guapissimo, who only registed to edit this page, was a little more subtle. Prepare for having a lot of not4chan members trolling this page soon... Since we're doing it for the lulz, we can't have them unfunny this article like that! ~ Krade 01:29, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Weren't you guys actually #1 for a time during the down? Now it's 2, but you had a run... Tyciol 15:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Lulz complaint
Is there a possibility that you will stop doing this for lulz? please. --GEORGE ZIMMER 15:23, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Um.... "no"? Did I win? Dr. Park N. Stones
- Well, good thing no one searches not4chan in google. And it's impossible to find your bitchy page with "child porn" or "pedophile". So as long as you little shitty sitey is small we can sleep well. --GEORGE ZIMMER 16:26, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Then what are your buddies doing trolling the article? It's the third in the last few days now. Shii wrote this on 8th Jun and the article was left untouched since then, I doubt he's the one trolling your boards. You guys should be worried about *legitimate* defamation in other places, not about æ's articles. We call everyone pedophiles and furries. ~ Krade 16:34, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Problems sleeping? Guilt will do that to you. Just admit your sickness and I'm sure you'll be sleeping like a baby in no time. Dr. Park N. Stones
- You're a little misunderstanding the situation, don't you. We have no problem with being called pedophiles, or furries, or whatever, but your neat page attracts child porn posters, whom we don't wont. --GEORGE ZIMMER 17:36, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Um, our site has humourous articles relating to the internets and all of it's perversion while yours has nekid kiddie drawings...... I don't think you have to worry about us attracting porn to your site. You got OTHER things that might attract kiddie porn, mmmkay?
- No, we don't have much to vorry about. And we by ourselves *don't* attract cp, contrary to your popular belief. And there is at least one cp poster who came from your humorous sitey relaiting to teh intravebz. --GEORGE ZIMMER 18:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Do you want me to believe that before or after hell freezes over? Dr. Park N. Stones
- belive what --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:58, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Do you want me to believe that before or after hell freezes over? Dr. Park N. Stones
- No, we don't have much to vorry about. And we by ourselves *don't* attract cp, contrary to your popular belief. And there is at least one cp poster who came from your humorous sitey relaiting to teh intravebz. --GEORGE ZIMMER 18:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Um, our site has humourous articles relating to the internets and all of it's perversion while yours has nekid kiddie drawings...... I don't think you have to worry about us attracting porn to your site. You got OTHER things that might attract kiddie porn, mmmkay?
- Wow, ParkingStones, bravo. You marked me as vandal. Sure i vandalized this talk page, didn't i? --GEORGE ZIMMER 17:36, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- You're a little misunderstanding the situation, don't you. We have no problem with being called pedophiles, or furries, or whatever, but your neat page attracts child porn posters, whom we don't wont. --GEORGE ZIMMER 17:36, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Well, good thing no one searches not4chan in google. And it's impossible to find your bitchy page with "child porn" or "pedophile". So as long as you little shitty sitey is small we can sleep well. --GEORGE ZIMMER 16:26, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I'm so watching this article now. I went there just to see what this was this all about and found this thread (warning, "lolicon" image) trashing æ in the exact day Zenigata and Guapissimo trolled the article. The drama! I sense this will turn out to be a great source of lulz. It will probably turn out like the Cracky-chan article, but at least this time we're not dealing with professional trolls. I'm hesitant between adding some lulz to the article just for the sake of it or leaving it alone... Umh... ~ Krade 15:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Think you're smart, mr. Shadow? --GEORGE ZIMMER 18:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Um, he does.... and, um, that would be... because he is... yeah. Dr. Park N. Stones
- If he would, he'd use name of someone without tripcode, not that crampy "Shadow". And it'd added more drama. But he thinks he's smart. --GEORGE ZIMMER 18:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- My username is Krade, not Shadow. What the hell are you talking about? If you want us to take you seriously, you'll have to explain things properly. ~ Krade 19:15, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- GEORGE ZIMMER does not forgive. --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:20, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) is that properly enough?
- Oh, I get it. Someone's pretending to be me in the page I linked before. Hey, it looks like I was promoted to Moderator of æ, despite only being here for a couple of days! Amazing. You'd think those trolls would do a little of research before. No, I never posted in not4chan so far. If you want to check, the reverse lookup of my IP ends in .pt, you probably log IPs there. Already attracting drama *and* I get my own clones, I almost feel eFamous. ~ Krade 19:25, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Who how do you think cloned you? I did. And why is ip of this mysterious "Shadow" the same as ip of one proxy? Beats me. You're acting so innocent, smart boy. That really makes me want to fap. --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:33, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- AND all drama is attracted by me, in fact i'm the only causing it, both this and not4chan are filled with lazy pigeons who just sit and jerk off in front of their crappy monitors. --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:38, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Uh, sure, Detective Dipshit. You win the internets. Don't forget your Internet check. If you're accusing me as as an attempt to get me pissed of you, you fail it. I don't feed the trolls. ~ Krade 19:40, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Not only you get clones, maddox does too, yeah? I could think that i'm hearing things, but i'm not actually hearing it, but reading. "I don't feed the trolls". Whole article about not4chan is food for trolls. And, like, how much times did you rev it? --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:51, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Uh, sure, Detective Dipshit. You win the internets. Don't forget your Internet check. If you're accusing me as as an attempt to get me pissed of you, you fail it. I don't feed the trolls. ~ Krade 19:40, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, I get it. Someone's pretending to be me in the page I linked before. Hey, it looks like I was promoted to Moderator of æ, despite only being here for a couple of days! Amazing. You'd think those trolls would do a little of research before. No, I never posted in not4chan so far. If you want to check, the reverse lookup of my IP ends in .pt, you probably log IPs there. Already attracting drama *and* I get my own clones, I almost feel eFamous. ~ Krade 19:25, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- GEORGE ZIMMER does not forgive. --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:20, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) is that properly enough?
- My username is Krade, not Shadow. What the hell are you talking about? If you want us to take you seriously, you'll have to explain things properly. ~ Krade 19:15, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- If he would, he'd use name of someone without tripcode, not that crampy "Shadow". And it'd added more drama. But he thinks he's smart. --GEORGE ZIMMER 18:53, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Um, he does.... and, um, that would be... because he is... yeah. Dr. Park N. Stones
- This is no longer a valid link. --無 22:42, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Think you're smart, mr. Shadow? --GEORGE ZIMMER 18:39, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Comedy turning
Why does everything even tangentially related to 4chan turn into unfunny wikiedit drama with a bunch of retarded salivating fanboys? I thought we were done with this crap when they finally stopped protecting Cracky-chan's honour like he/she/it was the Virgin Mary.--hardvice (talk) 19:06, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- OH YOU POOR GUY GEORGE ZIMMER FEELS REALLY SORRY FOR YOU WE WANT THIS THING REMOVED THATS WHY --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:14, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- So does every other loser we've ever written an article about. You'll be just as successful as the rest. My point is: what is it about retarded fanboys that causes them to be unable to tolerate anybody saying anything negative about them and/or their creepy obsessions, even when it's clearly in jest? I wasn't complaining about having to revert your buddies' unfunny vandalism; heck, there are enough of us that no lame edit has ever lasted more than an hour or so.--hardvice (talk) 19:35, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Are you, like, not reading? "We have no problem with being called pedophiles, or furries, or whatever, but your neat page attracts child porn posters, whom we don't wont. --GEORGE ZIMMER 17:36, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)". Or you didn't get it? cp is the reason of cloasure of many loliboards. we don't want nobody giving links to not4chan. --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:42, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oh no, I read that. And then I laughed. I know butt-hurt when I see it.--hardvice (talk) 19:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- GEORGE ZIMMER is really happy for you. --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:57, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) Now, this take us back to the meaning of "what is it about retarded fanboys that causes them to be unable to tolerate anybody saying anything negative about them and/or their creepy obsessions, even when it's clearly in jest?". --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:57, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I haven't the slightest clue what that last sentence is even supposed to mean. "Now, this take us back to the meaning of..."? D minus, plz see me after class.--hardvice (talk) 20:08, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- hast thou nothing more to say?
- Not really, no. It's hard to have a discussion when I feel like I'm playing charades every time I attempt to decipher one of your pithy replies.--hardvice (talk) 20:22, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- bye bye --GEORGE ZIMMER 20:26, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Not really, no. It's hard to have a discussion when I feel like I'm playing charades every time I attempt to decipher one of your pithy replies.--hardvice (talk) 20:22, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- hast thou nothing more to say?
- I haven't the slightest clue what that last sentence is even supposed to mean. "Now, this take us back to the meaning of..."? D minus, plz see me after class.--hardvice (talk) 20:08, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- GEORGE ZIMMER is really happy for you. --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:57, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) Now, this take us back to the meaning of "what is it about retarded fanboys that causes them to be unable to tolerate anybody saying anything negative about them and/or their creepy obsessions, even when it's clearly in jest?". --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:57, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Oh no, I read that. And then I laughed. I know butt-hurt when I see it.--hardvice (talk) 19:52, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Are you, like, not reading? "We have no problem with being called pedophiles, or furries, or whatever, but your neat page attracts child porn posters, whom we don't wont. --GEORGE ZIMMER 17:36, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)". Or you didn't get it? cp is the reason of cloasure of many loliboards. we don't want nobody giving links to not4chan. --GEORGE ZIMMER 19:42, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- So does every other loser we've ever written an article about. You'll be just as successful as the rest. My point is: what is it about retarded fanboys that causes them to be unable to tolerate anybody saying anything negative about them and/or their creepy obsessions, even when it's clearly in jest? I wasn't complaining about having to revert your buddies' unfunny vandalism; heck, there are enough of us that no lame edit has ever lasted more than an hour or so.--hardvice (talk) 19:35, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
You know, I seriously doubt anyone here knows anything about pedophilia. --Ronin 14:32, 6 Jul 2005 (UTC)
GEORGE ZIMMER
GEORGE ZIMMER IS:
- an idiot
- a troll
- a paedophile
- probably over 40
- 100% fluent in Engrish
--Alex¯jon 20:37, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- GEORGE ZIMMER doesn't speak for a whole community, even though he's trying to. Whether he's genuine I have no idea. Maybe he's trying to make more drama - that's certainly the effect of what he's doing. No-one sensible thinks this website is about anything other than trying to be funny. Not4chan's just getting a lot of child porn spammers just now which makes people jumpy, and some think encyclopaedia dramatica is contributing. I don't. That's all. -Unknown
- GEORGE ZIMMER also has an annoying habit of speaking about himself in third person, even in public. Quotes from Not4Chan's imageboards range from "GEORGE ZIMMER's cock sure is surrounded by cat anus!" and "GEORGE ZIMMER is balls deep in rabid badger!" This rampant bestiality on a pedophile imageboard has resulted in multiple bannings, although Georgey Boy is known to have uprooted completely and moved to another country to avoid IP bans from his precious Not4Chan. Go figure. --Viel 00:26, 2 Feb 2006 (UTC)
Admin Stuff
I'm wondering if the not4chan lunatics are done or if i should protect the page until they find some shiny new naked underage doodles. --kh/ what 15:01, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The best thing you could do is not allow people to post derogatory statments on this wiki. It is just fueling the battle between Not4chan and EncyclopediaDramatica, and I am sure that it will not end well for BOTH boards.
Also, someone from EncyclopediaDramatica IS doing the CP attacks. I was on another board and I saw that someone was taking credit for the attacks and saying that they got the idea from this page on your wiki. It may not be an Admin, but it is definitely a user of this wiki, and that reflects badly on both this board and every other like it.--Christopher
- Shut up, you stupid furry pedophile. --Heidi
- It will end well for AE because it just means more articles. For 4chan it will end badly, because it means the child porn will be obscured by whining text. --無 21:04, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- oh no a pedo thinks something would reflect badly upon our site. a pedo said this. a guy who frequents a site where child porn is posted. --kh/ what 21:13, 3 Jul 2005 (UTC)
I absolutly agree with this... Not everybody on N4C are pedos... some are recovering pedos and there are a coupls bad ones but you cant base an entire community on the type of pictures they host... The only person I know that posts CP on N4C Originates from THIS site and its based off this topic sugesting to him to go get some child porn. -criminalzerg
lawl!
INTERNET = SERIOUS BUSINESS
CP
CP can also mean:
- Child Predator
- Child Porker
- Child Poker
- Child Pounder
- Childish Pussy
--Alex¯jon
- Cocoa Puffs? Tyciol 15:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Hmmm... A pack of wild flamingoes
Well. It sounds to me like everybodies just throwing insults and not actually using their brains. So we'll try this logically. The correct definition of Not4Chan should probably be this:
A site that branches off from the 4chan website that dedicated itself to the safe exploration of pedofiliac behavior without any threat to real children because the people using the site know in their hearts that they would willing allow their genitals to be cut off with a red hot poker than see real children suffer the pain and indignation caused by the kind of monsters who do that stuff in real life..
For reference. I was raped when I was 8. And I happen to like lolicon too for the simple simple reason that nobody actually gets hurt!
lol... not4chan rulz! That said... not4chan lusers are a bunch of unfunny pussies who like it in the ass --Shaitan 11:40, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
I know that George wasn't very intelligent with how he went about his request... So how's about this; I would like it very much if you would at the very least remove the section telling people to troll not4chan. That better?
- No. LOL! --Bastardman 20:32, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Holy fuck. --WKD 01:53, 4 Feb 2006 (UTC)
Ninja monkee123
- Found this laying around thought you guys might enjoy reading this
Ninja monkee123: I am a 24 year old male, with blue hair and red eyes, currently out of work and looking for a new job. Preferably one where I'm around kids.
I am a confessed Michael Jackson and a fatass, who is attracted to female children, and I do apologize for that fact, for I have had these inclinations since I was at least a hundred years old and wasn't born with them. However, I have acted on my impulses towards female children and any child in general, mainly because I believe that the child shouldn't make the first move in a sexual situation. Some people may say that I am a "sick bastard". This is true. I would rape any child in my immediate area. This involves some threat of force or actual force being used against the child. I am a "child-raping bastard".
rape (rp) n. A European plant (Brassica napus) of the mustard family, cultivated as fodder and for its seed that yields a valuable oil. Also called colza, oil-seed rape.
you can read the full thing User:Christopher
I must say things like this dont really help your community... -cz
Lolicon
Not going to bother with the "debate" happening here, since I'm certain it's invaluable, but Lolicon is derived from Lolita, which doesn't have anything to do with Japanese, but everything to do with sexual attraction to young girls.
- Thank you so much. ~ Banaan 22:48, 3 Feb 2006 (UTC)
- If it's got something to do with sexual attraction to young girls, then it has something to do with Japanese as well. --Bastardman 23:03, 3 Feb 2006 (UTC)
- For God's sake, people, at least do your research before making yourself look like fools! 'Lolicon' is not derived in whole or in part from 'Lolita' in any way, it's JAPANESE, and furthermore the correct interpretation in English is 'Rorikon'. It may be a sick fuck's fetish for prepubescent girls, but it doesn't mean you have to flaunt your glaringly obvious ignorance on AE! --Viel 03:34, 4 Feb 2006 (UTC)
- Honestly, we don't really care. ED doesn't strive to be accurate on things like those. We leave word definitions and that sort of crap to other people. We're all about parody; if you're looking for dictionary definitions on ED, you're crazy. Look those up somewhere else. We do usually have our facts right if you're looking for the meaning of that latest Internet meme or the completely irrelevant history behind that other drama, though. It's just not in our goals to be encyclopedic about things like the etymology of non-Internet words, so we often use misinformation as a way to enhance the parody of the subject its referring to. We're hoping that our readers are smart enough to tell parody from truth apart and understand that an Email from a MAILER-DAEMON address doesn't mean that your email arrived, for instance. Hope this helps. On a completely unrelated note, I'm kinda proud that a talk page I created when I was a noob turned out into such a huge discussion. ~ Krade hi yo~ 03:49, 4 Feb 2006 (UTC)
- dudes...please...lolicon does not mean pedophiles. Read wikipedia:
"Lolicon, alternate spelling Rorikon (ロリコン), is a Japanese abbreviation of Lolita complex, a term derived from Nabakov's book Lolita. Generally, it is a term used to describe an attraction to any girl beneath the age of consent, both percieved and actual pedophilia. ("Lolita Complex" is abbreviated as "lolicon" rather than "lolicom" due to the phonology of Japanese. Other foreign words with syllables ending in "m" are often transliterated in the same manner.) Strictly speaking, Lolita complex in Japanese refers only to the paraphilia, but the abbreviation lolicon can refer to the individual."
hermoine
Apparently this page is protected but whatever, Like most wapanese not4chaners hate anything western. but apparently they love hermoine, anime style or not they don't care. Hell it can even be a fucking photoshop of a real image and they wouldnt say a thing. This is the one exception and anything else non-western is hated and degraded alot Explanation?
- Because hermoine is a loli ftw?? Aurora sword 09:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm thinking because the Harry Potter books are popular worldwide... I mean hell, on the anime Read or Die the blonde one even goes "My favourite book is Harry Potter!" So yeah, fandoms get shipped. Know any other good fantasy awesome books? Oh, and loli aside, I think getting turned into a catgirl had a thing to do with it. Tyciol 15:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Dead?
It seems that Not4chan is offline, and has been for at least 24-hours. Interesting. Could the feds be involved? Hackers? Or did it just get so full of underage titties that it collapsed in on itself like a dying star? --Ichheisse 00:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
- something do with new law being passed making lolicon illegal--Anzac 19:38, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
If no one else will say it
I hope you know that you're all geeks and nerds, and I hope you die in a God damn grease fire. (Of course, not really speaking of pedophiles and not4chan-ers (except they are mostly nerds). They're just different and misunderstood. The rest of you are just stupid.) Thank you and Christ be with you.
- I skullfucked Jesus, boy. Stop saying shit and contribute-Ket Refill/lol 21:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll contribute by saying that you don't have any room to talk, lolicon is not the same as child porn, and the internet created more problems for not4chan than not4chan created for anyone. 'Nuff said!-Finkelstein
"lolicon is not the same as child porn" - Just keep telling yourself that, pedo. ~ CATS 05:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)"
Unless a new law has been passed that I have not yet seen, technically he's right. (at least in the U.S.) United States Code, Title 18, section 2256 was edited with the 2003 "Protect Act". I'll quote it for you.
"(11) the term `indistinguishable' used with respect to a depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings depicting minors or adults."
This basicly states that, as long as it was drawn (probably CG stuff that doesn't look too real too) is protected. It doesn't count as kiddy porn. Section 501 & 502 of the bill are where they really get into the topic of animated porn. Read it. not4chaners, you guys read it too.
If there's a bill or law or whatever the technical term is for it that proves me wrong, post a link, argue your case.--Vafthruthnir 12:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
who cares what the law says, lolicon is for sick fucks and sick fucks only myspandexparadise 11:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Psh, if it's a sickness, it's a mental one, and I don't believe in mental sickness. Tyciol 15:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
The New Site Owner
With Not4chan.us Saber no longer is associated with the site. Which is why the site is less then popular now. The new guy running it is Narunet.
Also; Should we have a page on the site owner Narunet? If so, he is a 15 (underage B&) year old. Has a stickcam (http://www.stickam.com/profile/narunet), likes asses a lot (e.g. once said he had "One Ass; to rule them all"). Has a /b/tard girlfriend or claims to have one. S/he's also a Weeaboo and they possibly have hand butt sex with rubbers in a shared hug box. He also helps friends make pedo-loli websites and then rats on them when they use their server for illegal porns and shitty Microsoft gaems using a fake Gmail account. Also is acquaintance with Eji Samuron. Who he allowed to air USB link (Show you later) child pornography.--Maze 05:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
