Image:Big star.pngWE MADE IT TO THE FINALS! NOW WE NEED YOUR VOTES MORE THAN EVER!!!
 Encyclopedia Dramatica is in contention for the 2nd Annual Mashable Open Web Awards for the wiki category. With your help, we can beat the Wikipedia menace! Plz vote for ED by going here; you can vote once per day, per email address, ballot stuffing encouraged! Just don't forget to confirm the vote via e-mail. VOTE OR DIE!!!

Talk:Ratherberucking

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] This article is crap - Invoking papal infallibility

Due to the constant additions and changes being done to this article, it has turned into utter shite. It isn't even parody, it's just a collection of crappy bullet points. This article needs explanations and information with LULZ. Someone who is famaliar with the subject, get it together please. The next edit to this article better be a partial or complete re-write with some serious lulzy information. If not, fear the wrath. Same goes for other articles in a smiliar state. --girlvinyl 17:21, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

  • This is why I applied the WARZONE template to it. Once again, like its predecessors Paigegirl and Iworshipsatin, it is pointless to edit it while it is still a warzone and while it is unprotected - the edit will merely be trampled either totally or with new information haphazardly thrown into the article in revenge - which would then need to be re-edited to include this information. I plan to sit down and hack something agreeable out of this mess once everybody gets over themselves and forgets about it. In this specific case, you should plan on leaving it blank for at least several decades. --無 22:08, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
    • I was hoping some of the good ED writers would get around to it and attempt it. It's not an easy one, for sure. I still don't really get exactly what the hell is going on. So yeah, blank it is until someone can write something up. Non-sysops are welcome to write a draft here in the talk pages and a sysop will put it in the article since it's protected. There are so many more, universally interesting articles that can be written, it's too bad that so many people are focusing their time and energy on something that is only of interest to like 3 people. --girlvinyl 22:19, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
      • Oh, I get your implication. --無 22:38, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Re-write process

Someone can begin the re-write process. I am fucking sick of this shit. Write an ARTICLE. *ARTICLE*. A-R-T-I-C-L-E. Which describes the situations, events, etc, with relevent links and do it in a parody-styled manner. If there is no one who can do that, it will just fucking remain blank. Other people need to be able to understand the article, other people who are not involved and it must, in SOME way be agreeable at least to reasonable, standard internet people [thus meaning it can be a little nuts, but can't be outlandish stupidity that only provides entertainment to one small group]. --girlvinyl 20:36, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

  • I've created a stubbly phoenix from the ashes. I invite sysops to extend the article and other contributors to make suggestions here in the talk page. I personally think we should take the risk of unprotecting this article. The worst that could happen is that I'll extend my list of banishments... --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 03:58, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Raw material

Googling "ratherberucking" produces this quote: 

From one e-friend to another:
"If I'm so awesomely hawt and intelligent,
why can't I win hawtness and luv IRL?"
Well, perhaps we can help you with that answer...
Could it be from being a whiney, emo, high-maintenance drama-queen,
throwing hissy-fits and frequenting friends-list drama?

[edit] WikiEdit Drama (old version)

Note: I revert for the lulz, not because I agree/disagree. --Quasidan 21:22, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • iawtr. --無 21:34, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I was thinking about trawling the history page and replacing "has a big nose" with a concatenation of all the things that have been deleted (crowned, of course, with "and is a genius according to Mensa"), and leaving "What of it?" on the end. I thought better of it, though. You lot seem to know her and so even if the wikisnipes do give me fits of hysterics, I don't suppose I should just keep poking at her like that. It's probably only funny to me. --Frowningman 21:43, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • I consider her a good friend, and I think you should do exactly that. --無 21:50, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • Done, just for you. Having talked about the joke has kind of spoilt the mood, though. --Frowningman 23:37, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
        • You feeling bad about it is half the fun. --無 23:56, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
          • Well, I don't feel bad about it, it's just that I'm not sure Wiki's a good context for trolling. It has all this history shit, and people have to wade through it, and I don't know anybody here so I don't know if I'm approaching vandalism. On the other side of it, the page as it was before this started makes me cringe. Just what kind of saddo' toady is PaigeGirl? --Frowningman 07:40, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
              • Well I don't don't know who YOU are, but if you have something to say or ask me speak TO me. paigegirl
                • And will you USE the ultimate POWERS of CAPSLOCK!!!!1!!1!?questionmark?Gerbilsage 11:59, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
                  • Hell yes, it's been a capslock sort of day. paigegirl
                    • Tell me, are you really batshit insane? I've heard rumours that you were. Your (mis)usage of Caps is sort of verifying the claim. Gerbilsage 13:08, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
                      • Well sure I am. Just ask aelius, belt0033, mrbogey & smileyme. You trust their judgement don't you? PaigeGirl
                        • belt0033 would have to ask his gun, and aelius just writes speeches for other people to deliver, but the rumour of you being batshit insane didn't come from them. Thinking of that, I can't remember from where the rumour came. Ah, well. There's too much sanity in the world anyway. Gerbilsage 08:07, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
                          • I may indeed be batshit insane, just makes me more interesting doncha think? Hell I'll cop to that! PaigeGirl
                • Just what kind of saddo' toady are you? --Frowningman 22:48, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
                  • The kind that wrote this article which was decent enough to have been one of ED's articles of the week. Please feel free to add the funny without being an ass. paigegirl
                    • Good for you! --Frowningman 11:22, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
                      • Make with the funny, not sarcasm, which is pretty useless.PaigeGirl
                        • You know that scene near the end of American Beauty where Spacey punks out when he realises what a n00b Suvari(?) is? I feel kind of like that, now. --Frowningman 12:54, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) - oh, spoiler warning, by the way.
    • I have never even heard of this person outside of ED --Quasidan 03:31, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • OK, most of the shit is actually pretty funny, but I do want the mensa shit gone. I'm actually really pissed at Will for posting what was in actuality a locked post in here, as I was writing it for journal, not whole of internets. Mensa is lame. --Thehooker 01:26, 29 Apr 2005
    • Cheer up. Gerbilsage 07:22, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • Of course Mensa's lame. That's why it's such a brilliant quote. The tests I've studied can't even distinguish genius from not (definitions vary, but I don't think any are as low as Mensa qualification); the ceilings are close to the Mensa qualification level so they don't develop complexes when they see each other's scores. --Frowningman 07:42, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • You know, that edit is actually pretty funny, as I sent back an rsvp to a mensa dinner with the no box checked and "you guys are dorks" written under it. So you're close. :)

What's the deal here? Some kind of pitiful WikiEdit Drama? I am going to combine all versions and then protect the page unless some sort of consensus is reached soon (preferably a combination of all versions). I will also consider banning someone if I think it is warranted... --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 02:17, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • it's Friends list drama that's spilled over into ED. i'm not gonna list details here but the subject and a former friend are in disagreement over some things. it's messy and ugly and i'm trying to keep it relatively nice here. --kh/ what 23:18, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I asked an ED moderator to remove the negative bits from this article. --yes 10:42, 02 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Denied

Request to alter anything on the article has been denied. Thank you for flying with us. Have a good day. --Scarlet-sysop 17:49, 2 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hissy Fit

Oh god Scar, why? Now she will delete her jernal and get a new one again, and we'll have to move the article again.--hardvice (talk) 23:25, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

  • Nah. I only delete when there is IRL stalking involved. This is actually pretty hillarious. Especially since my "hissy" is only leading Will to reveal himself as the self important fucktard he really is. He's proclaimed himself a "Dramacrat" and has apparently declared war on me. Gee...I wonder what his new "STEALTH" mission will be.
  • It's all about the LULZ. <3 --Scarlet-sysop 23:29, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
    • ur a coldharted snaek --Alex¯jon 23:32, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
      • That's "snake" to you, Mister!! --Scarlet-sysop 23:35, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

I'm so glad I didn't have the internet when I was 14. --Frowningman 09:31, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

  • So am I. Then I wouldn't have spent my adolescence drinking myself into stupors. Oh...wait...

[edit] Drama Remorse

I feel like I've made a real and valuable contribution to drama history by making the first evar reference to drama remorse that Google knows about, and by having the term used so liberally in reference to this article and the other. I'd like to thank you all for your support and your inspiration. I'd also like to thank my mother and God. Thanks mum. Thanks God. This one's for the Gipper! I love you all! --Frowningman 23:10, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Protected

There have been numerous edits in the last 24 hours, but I can't see any significant new material
or improvements in the article. Generally speaking, it only makes sense to add new material. If
you merely change other people's work, someone's soon going to come along and change it back -
particularly if your edits are unfunny.

Rather than waste everyone's time, please post your proposed new material (not mere
wiki edit drama) below this message and the sysops will consider adding it to the article. It
better be funny, though. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 03:20, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
  • looks like it didn't take long for people to start fucking with this again. --kh/ what 21:50, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

Note to Paigegirl's little buddy, Thewanker: it's not the two lines that are TL;DR, it's the moronic, mispelled rant you linked to. I tried to read it for the sake of fairness. I'm not a first grade teacher or her mommy, so I didn't have the patience to continue beyond a few lines. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 13:49, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] BORING

WIKIEDIT DRAMA IS BOOOOOORRING--Harish Rallapali 20:24, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Stub

Should someone add this to the category's tub, and add that stub template that asks for expansion. I would do it but I'm afraid I might fuck up or someone might not want it there. Soccrmastr 21:10, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

Retrieved from "http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Talk:Ratherberucking"
Personal tools

Bookmark and Share