Talk:Skratchgirl
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Hey. I realize that most of my editing skills apply to codes of conduct for corporations, but this thing needs a new template called "uber-crap". It has headers with one line of content that don't make sense and don't relate to each other. There isn't one external link to reference anything. It meantions circling fat thighs but doesn't link to anything that would put that in context. There seems to be enough material to make this somewhat humorous. Anyone have any ideas? --BiGPimpin 03:35, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
It was vandalised by Icondreams, who is Skratchgirl.
That's not an idea. --Aussieintn 04:11, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Ho, hum. I'm not going to point anybody to the history of this article. Nope, I'm not even going to suggest that this article might be better in a previous state that totally pissed off the person that vandalised it. Nope, I would never do anything like that.
- You're just going to whine about it and not do anything about it? --Aussieintn 04:20, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- What can I do about it? I just tried to copy and paste the old version back in, but that wouldn't work. Gerbilsage 04:21, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I think you can work it out eventually. --Aussieintn 04:24, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- It'd take you two seconds, but I shall attempt to work it out. Gerbilsage 04:26, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I could do it, but I don't want any crap to stick to my fingers and I've run out of disposable latex gloves. --Aussieintn 04:37, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Ah, my edit was crap. Fair enough, I'll stop bitching. Gerbilsage 04:39, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not picking on your edit in particular. I think the entire article is crappy. I dunno... it needs something... --Aussieintn 04:55, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Her main drama is in reference to Poloemily. Apart from that - and her connexion to a dwarf that shall remain unnamed and unarticled - there isn't much drama. Oh, apart from her debating style (SkratchAttakk). Gerbilsage 05:19, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Oh, and she really didn't like the fact that Poloemily was hailed as brilliant in the 'Genesis of Skratchgirl' section in contrast to herself. Hence the major edit. And she's no longer talking to me. It really upset her. Gerbilsage 05:21, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Poor girl (refer to image above left). I wonder how many asterisks we can get to in this discussion... --Aussieintn 05:25, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Not sure. And isn't it asterices? Anyhoo, time for me to redo the bloody thing back to when the titles made sense. Sure, it's not classic, but it's better than this crap. Gerbilsage 05:29, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Done and done. It keeps the Genesis bit, but lets Skratch keep her claim of an MA (which is actually true, but amusing to deny) in tact. Gerbilsage 05:38, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- i say we wipe it clean and redirect to goatse for a while. --kh/ what 05:42, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- You don't think that stunt has been repeated ad nauseum already? BTW, I wouldn't use the word "asterices"... well, not in the English language. Why don't we claim her MA to be in some bizarre speciality? Perhaps she majored in Internet Drama or Catfighting. And isn't it redundant to state that an MA was "in Arts"? That's what the A stands for in MA. --Aussieintn 05:45, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- This looks much better with the waahmbulance on the left. Please don't mess with my artistic design, Quasidan. --Aussieintn 20:17, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- You don't think that stunt has been repeated ad nauseum already? BTW, I wouldn't use the word "asterices"... well, not in the English language. Why don't we claim her MA to be in some bizarre speciality? Perhaps she majored in Internet Drama or Catfighting. And isn't it redundant to state that an MA was "in Arts"? That's what the A stands for in MA. --Aussieintn 05:45, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- i say we wipe it clean and redirect to goatse for a while. --kh/ what 05:42, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Done and done. It keeps the Genesis bit, but lets Skratch keep her claim of an MA (which is actually true, but amusing to deny) in tact. Gerbilsage 05:38, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Not sure. And isn't it asterices? Anyhoo, time for me to redo the bloody thing back to when the titles made sense. Sure, it's not classic, but it's better than this crap. Gerbilsage 05:29, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Poor girl (refer to image above left). I wonder how many asterisks we can get to in this discussion... --Aussieintn 05:25, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not picking on your edit in particular. I think the entire article is crappy. I dunno... it needs something... --Aussieintn 04:55, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Ah, my edit was crap. Fair enough, I'll stop bitching. Gerbilsage 04:39, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I could do it, but I don't want any crap to stick to my fingers and I've run out of disposable latex gloves. --Aussieintn 04:37, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- It'd take you two seconds, but I shall attempt to work it out. Gerbilsage 04:26, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- I think you can work it out eventually. --Aussieintn 04:24, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- What can I do about it? I just tried to copy and paste the old version back in, but that wouldn't work. Gerbilsage 04:21, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
