What is Encyclopedia Dramatica? • What does ED exist to document? • What doesn't belong here?

If you haven't looked at ED:LULZ in a while, now is a great time to catch up.

Click here to donate to ED and help support the cause.

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Contents 1 "blatant factual inaccuracies" 2 HALT 3 useless headline 4 obsess much 5 Update 6 damn! 7 Moderator intervention! YAY! 7.1 General tips for this article: 7.2 Specific tips for this article 7.3 Update

Synthetikmisery is MALE!? HAHAHA OMG I DID NOT KNOW THAT! --girlvinyl 16:46, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

And you said Kadmonster had no sense of humor! --Quasidan the Jew 20:47, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

If you people would just trust me I like to put some thought into my humor. I wont let you down I assure you. And FYI his name is Marius. And if you think that's funny check out this little gem of a thread. I'm still trying to figure out how to work that in.--Kadmonster 11:38, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Let my edits alone. Besides it's funnier by a far shot than the weak watered down version that only makes you look good. Stop jacking off. Dig the paraody. paigegirl

PS editing does not mean going in, undoing and deleting everyone elses work. Got it? paigegirl

anyone remember all the details from his beef with debate? i was there for it but can't recall just what happened or the order in which events occurred. --Killhamster 18:19, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Oh please stating that synthetikmisery is known for his good sense of humor and his huge cock is not parody. its crap. and the rest of your modifications are a shallow attempt to make the incident look like something other than his complete and total humiliation, mostly self-inflicted. that factor is what makes it so damn funny in the first place. Furthermore it bears mentioning that if Illlaw cant get away with it, neither should synthetikmisery.--Kadmonster 19:08, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hooray! Look, paige! We made wiki-edit drama!--Kadmonster 20:46, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hooray indeed! The fact remains that you are'nt the only one who gets to decide what goes here. Dissenting opinions are allowed and acceptable. Your problem is you are trying simply out to be vindictive. And oh, you don't get to censor other members that I'm aware of, noone made you boss bitch. paigegirl

lol edit drama paigegirl

Now this is pathetic. Surely you all could find better crap on SynthetikMisery. It is out there and not hard to find. I am sadly dissapointed in most of you. I will pwn myself just to make this page credible. Fuckin' circlejerkin' automatons.

• WHAT sign your posts, nerd. Also, I don't know this "guy" at all - until recently I thought it was a hot goth girl. --girlvinyl 20:35, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Oh and by the way, the name Marius? That's hellacious hawt, so you gotta do better than that. paigegirl

I never got the freaking memo on name signing, but I will look into it. No, not a hot goth girl, but most definetly a hawt goth guy. - synthetikmisery

Someone needs to teach Kadmonster the rules on here. STOP the self glorification. Let other people also post on here. YOU SUCK AT THIS AND ARE NOT FUNNY. - synthetikmisery

• Hi. The FAQ might help. Typically when people post in the talk pages, you don't know who said what unless they add their sig. There is a button for it up at the top of the edit box too. --girlvinyl 07:36, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I know! Which is funnier? What he wrote, or e-dick!? lol paigegirl

paigegirl, editing does not mean giving the guy a handjob either. if you assert things that are blatantly false AND not funny i will replace them with what is the case, which is so much funnier than anything I could have made up. you can for instance keep asserting that he is known for being a moderate and has a huge cock. that I will keep deleting until one of the site maintainers steps in and tells me not to or you come up with some agreement that we can both live with.--Kadmonster 07:41, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] "blatant factual inaccuracies"

Dear Kadmonster,

Please be advised that this site has NOTHING to do with factual accuracy, blatant or otherwise. It is meant for sarcasm, humor, hyperboyle, parody and satire. This is explained in the disclaimer that you agreed to when you created your account. Feel free to make edits as you see fit, while understanding that edits which are not funny will most likely be overwritten by other users. Blatant factual accuracy is rarely funny and therefor lessens the quality of the site overall. Thank you for your fealty,

--girlvinyl 07:41, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

right factual inaccuracies arent the main issue here. stroking the guy's ego isnt any more funny than factual accuracy. --Kadmonster 07:45, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• The best part is that I'm saying all of this and I haven't even read the article. HA HA. --girlvinyl 07:46, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

AWWWWWWWW, is'nt that cute. doc_neuro is jealous of Paige writing things about me. HOW CUTE!! - synthetikmisery

[edit] HALT

ok, hi. I think this article is long enough to where it now requires pictures. AT LEAST ONE PLEASE. Someone get pics!@ --girlvinyl 08:12, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• I will see about a picture. paigegirl

Marius is ugly and nothing bipedal would have sex with him. This has been proved by science. --Dancingdrew 23:57, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Drew are you being mean to me? :( paigegirl
• Hay Drew:
  
  --Quasidan the Jew 07:10, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Good one Drew!! I am impressed. - synthetikmisery

[edit] useless headline

I know English isn't my original language, but this sounds goofy: synthetikmisery is also known for his adoring women who made naughty edits to this post asserting blatant factual inaccuracies in mind of the funny over obvious agendas.

It was part of an edit war, you can check history to see what it was before that. You really are'nt supposed to just randomly delete when you can edit, so that's what I did there. The whole article could probly do without it, it was in response to Kadmonster obvious axe grinding. If you want to take a shot at fixing it for grammar please do. paigegirl

[edit] obsess much

for the love of all that is holy, what is wrong with you? --B_iGP_imp_in 02:37, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Sign your name brainlesswonder! lol just clearing things up. It's a fair article. paigegirl

• It is also extremely uninteresting as it doesn't actually satirize anything. --無 & Ghostlight 03:30, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

If you wish to add your version please do so. But make your own heading and article beneath it. Mine is a fair representaion at least, I have'nt seen him get a fair shake ever. paigegirl PS ghostlight, look at my other articles, poloemily, imaybeparanoid and beltboy, I did the same there and they are all good articles, so is this one. You are free to write your own piece as you know, but I'm tired of struggling over this. paigegirl

• As I understand it fair representations are for User pages, not main articles. You've agressively underscored any sense of making a mockery of things - I mean, I can understand why - but it's just that the aggressive and defensive editing of this piece in particular has resulted in a gigantic mess of links and non-linear notes that is largely uninvolving to read, and completely unorganised.
  I would take you up on your offer to write my "own version", but without completely rewriting the entire article it would just be contributing to the behemoth of Gehenna that this thing has become. This piece needs some serious editing by an 'impartial' person going through all the edits and picking out relevant and interesting pieces to satirize. I'd be more than happy to do that, except you keep taking out my pig bottom pipe. --無 & Ghostlight 03:57, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • This article started out as one persons personal vendetta against me and only dealt witha minor incident between him and I. It sucked when it started. The we had another addition by another axe grinder that totally missed the point of ED. All articles have to be fair and show both sides. This is Paige's take on me, and hopefully it will get someone else who is impartial and add times I got pwn'd or whatever. I like what Paige added. I think it is good. The parts that make it unreadable are the parts by Doc_neuro and his vendetta. - synthetikmisery
    • And I accept that. What I'm saying is that Paige's take on you is not "fair", it's pedestrian. What fun is poked at you remains from other edits, and it is largely phrased in a vindictive manner which makes it unfunny. The problem I see, now, is that nobody scrapped everything and rebuilt it - the edits were all done one on top of the other, and they were always quick edits. --無 & Ghostlight 04:33, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • The problem I see, now, is that nobody scrapped everything and rebuilt it - the edits were all done one on top of the other, and they were always quick edits.

I agree it was a mess. That's why i separted into catagories and basically I did just rebuild it. Most of theoriginal is all based on one conflict between parties, it told absolutely nothing about Marius himself and was only doc_neuro ode to himself. paigegirl

• • • • Paige's take on me is fair, as it is her view on me. Everyone has their own and that is why we can all edit all articles. Everyone has a different take on everyone. It does need a little more order as it is all over the place with all the different people editing it. I dont think anything should be taken out, just needs to be re-arranged by, like you said, a impartial.

Some things that people are adding, really are dumb though and not funny, like your pigbottom thing. You can do better then that. - synthetikmisery

your pig bottom line does not apply, I'm a girl and he is not. That's just another way among the half dozen others that he was being slammed with homophobic insults. I will accept editing or a ruling by GV, I've seen no impartial person attempt this article. Btw, you own article was in no way as vindictive as this piece of crap was. paigegirl

• pig bottom is a term for a man, ergo it can apply to him. I felt it was funny because it disjointed your incessant over-compensation for vindictive edits. If you think that being compared to a homosexual is degrading then that's your opinion - I cannot control your bigotry. I though my own article was pretty harsh initially - but I sucked it up and uploaded a picture (owning the entire original article) and most of the shit was then removed in a subsequent edit by Quasidan. --無 & Ghostlight 04:33, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Look ghostlight, you got your pigbottom link in the article... lolz. - synthetikmisery
• as I'm hardly a bigot and you know so, I'll let that slide. I think when one is bombarded by such comparisons, it leaves good humor and becomes insulting. We can all share the page ghostlight. Add your take or whatever, the fairer representation(/Lj biography) does have some humor, it's just not wielded in a slashing motion. No problem with you adding your own take on Marius, just use a bolded title and go for it. This is the only way we will agree I think. Also, good parody IS an overall view of a person, not just petty digs at their character. paigegirl

PS This article was orignally written by someone with an axe to grind, by one person. He intended to have it all his own way all the way down the line. It was never parody, it was a hatchett job. Now it has a little humor that is not mean-spirited and is a fair representation of a real person on lj. paigegirl

[edit] Update

It's still a rambling mess of non-lulz. <3 --無 & Ghostlight 05:53, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Please for the record, what is ghostlights definition of funny. Also, as far as rambling goes, it makes much more sense and is far more coherent than it was before I re-did it.paigegirl

This isn't the place for defending your little friends from being made fun of. It's a parody site. Don't take it seriously and get all defensive. Go and edit Kadmonster's article in a similar style or do something else that might provide some lulz because, frankly, you are boring it up around here. --Aussieintn 06:14, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Maybe people here are missing the point of ED. It is not just to rip everyone apart and have it only be that way. It is for humor and satire, good points or bad. Just cause you want to watch people get ripped up, does not mean everyone does. Satire and parody can also be done in a good light. - synthetikmisery
  • Show us some "good light" satire/parody, then. Examples, please. --Aussieintn 14:01, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • imaybeparanoid is one example. No one is whining over there. Doesn't always have to all drama and all malicious content for it to work. Your new additions now made this article stupid with the headers you put. Again, a axe to grind that is based on no truth at all. If Paige wants to add to the article, she is more than allowed. This is why anyone can edit. Sorry if you think it all has to be slash jobs based on nothing. She is the only one that added anything true to this article that wasnt based on self glorification of the editor. What I see is some desperate guys that can't handle a female saying something nice about someone. - synthetikmisery
      • I don't have an axe to grind here. It's ridiculous that you would suggest that - I don't know you from Adam. I know you want only wonderful things written about yourself, but I think that style of article belongs on your resume or personal web site rather than here. --Aussieintn 01:00, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Uh actually no. I'm asking for GV to intervene on this , its gone on too damn long. That unfunny foul little bitch does not get to have it his own way. GV already put the wammy on his ass once.paigegirl

• "Marius terms himself a moderate republican, he is a fiscal conservative who rejects moral bigotry." Hilarious. You seem to want this to be a vanity site. And what on earth is "moral bigotry"? --Aussieintn 14:01, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] damn!

Hey, look guys. Let's face it. It's bady written, impossible to follow, unfunny crap. This is not to insult anyone, it's just that it's true. I suggest you just meet somewhere in the middle. You can't ignore the fact that marius' claim to fame is being an idiot who makes a fool out of himself. However, on ocassion he actually makes a funny. Anyone who searched marius and finds a bunch of crap about his cock will come to the conclusion that this place is run by idiots. I'm not suggesting that marius is actually an idiot, just that he plays one on lj. So why not just turn the article over to a nuetral party, make it funny again, and lock it. I'm sure that most of you can agree that right now, it just isn't funny. --B_iGP_imp_in 18:01, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• • Was never funny to begin with, BW. At least Paige added some actual content to it that was more then just a one day retarded flame war with doc_neuro. She made it funny, even with her fair description statements in there. New edits are just more blatant attempts at grinding a axe without any real merit or accuracy. Maybe I should just do like ghostlight did, and write it all myseld, cause, yeah, that's fair. - synthetikmisery
    • I have no idea really. I was just offering my idea at a solution. I do think your "funny" might be a little skewed, though. I didn't even smirk, and I laugh all day long. I just want harmony and peace. I keep my drama on LJ --19:42, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • i have no problem turning it over to a neutral person, but that would be none of you. I'm asking GV to intervene on this one because its just getting stupid. I'm fine with any judgements she makes as she has no axe to grind. paigegirl
    • Hey, I am the epitome of neutral. I even signed your Guestbook you big baby! Why must you insult me when I offer nothing but peace and harmony! WHY, WHY, WHY!!!! --B_iGP_imp_in 19:42, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

IAWTC--I read the Recentchanges page several times a day, and I always skip the Synthetikmisery article. It is boring and, like Pimp said, impossible to follow. This article needs to be completely rewritten. --Q^\DAN 18:56, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• • You had to fix the damn, I knew you would you neurotic bastard! and it's not "pimp", I don't recall you fucking me and sending me flowers. It's BigPimpin to you --B_iGP_imp_in 19:03, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Moderator intervention! YAY!

First, some points to keep in mind:

• This is not wikipedia, we will NOT get serious here.
• If you are taking it seriously, you're in violation of our legal statement.
• I'm not above banning people for a day or two to chill them out.

Hi. Ok, I haven't even read this article and frankly I don't have any experience with the people involved as far as their MO on the net. I skimmed it and frankly, it's a fucking mess.

[edit] General tips for this article:

1. Don't delete the material of others, simply change them to something you find more satisfactory, also known as "edit"
2. The article should be informative for someone who is not famaliar with the topic. This article is not that. Speaking as someone who isn't famaliar with synthetikmisery, I can say that the article does not help me get it and isn't written in a way to acquaint me with the subject.
3. This article needs more funny. As evidenced by the talk pages, people are taking this article seriously and that makes for content that isn't funny. We aren't looking for neutral, we're looking for humorous and a little informative.

[edit] Specific tips for this article

1. If there are ongoing rivalries with other users, break them down into spearate sections with many links and a good explaination or play-by-play of the spat.
2. I still don't get who exactly he is or why he's so controversial. That actually needs to be made more clear. From what I gather he's a hot NY goth guy who is also politically secular conservative. I think he is really a Libertarian, but that is a whole other topic we won't get in to.
3. If you want to talk about ED wiki-edit wars, fee free. However, make sure to put them in their own section, with a headline and explain what happened.
4. The headlines are WAY too long. Please write in a manner that is succint and easy to read.
5. Using the wiki markup to your advantage will make it much more clear what you're talking about. Don't hit people with a wall of text. Lists and bullets are fun and good. If you don't know wiki markup - LEARN IT! There is a sandbox for experimenting and also documentation on this site and on wikipedia itself. Also, people who are best at edits and wiki markup usually end up being sysops.

Finally, I don't know who made what edits, so I'm not showing any kind of bias in my above comments. Also, writing clear, concise parodies is not an easy task. Not everyone can do it, and I don't think anyone does it well on their first tries.

AND CONCLUSION POINT: Get this together with a compromise, organized formatting and a heavy dose of the lulz.

--girlvinyl 20:08, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• re: #2 That is the problem all rolled up. His conterversy is relegated to all the people who post here pretty much. So when someone like me read it they get real confused real quick. You are truly an editorial guru, we should have sex. --B_iGP_imp_in 20:19, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • • Someone like you? Liar. Quit acting like a neutral when you most surely are not. You were in DEbate and also hold a grudge. Yeesh at least own your own pettiness and dont lie to make yourself look goo BW. paigegirl
      • Sunshine, if you look at that post not much of it has anything to do with debate. I am engaged in quite cordial[sic] conversation with marius, and don't hold a grudge. You will note that I did not edit or change any of that entry. I simply pointed out that it wasn't cogent. They only reason I noticed was the 400 times a day it was being editted. There is no reason to call me petty or a liar since my only involvement in this entire thing has been offering reasoned suggestions to help improve the site. When I suggest that someone "like me" who has no real knowledge of doc_nero, lima_pc, or the others will get lost in that entry I am being honest and factual. I'm sorry that you feel otherwise --B_iGP_imp_in 20:49, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • Then do not pretend to be an innocent bystander when you and Marius have a history as well as you and I. You are not a neutral so don't pretend. I know you hold a grudge against me, for what I never could figure out, throughout all of your vindictiness towards me.paigegirl
      • Sunshine, I'm not quite sure what I am pretending about. I will note that your vindictiveness towards me is well-documented. But you seem to think that means I hold a grudge. My suggestions are always reasoned and sensible and focus on nothing but what would be best editorially. If think that I have somehow lashed out at you on this site then I apologize. I will ask that you stop making accusations and calling me things and engage me in discussions about lulz and funny and porn. --B_iGP_imp_in 21:02, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Update

While I don't fully agree with just trashing people in articles based on innacuracies, and ignoring positive satire on people. I re-edited the article, took out the gush and put in some jabs. Made it more coherent, so far, and hope this will be the start of ending wikidrama. Add more, but make it actual. There is enough out there from me on LJ to find. Paige was adding her views of me. I am sorry that a nice thought by a female is forbiden in the alpha-male kingdom. - synthetikmisery

lol edit drama i just wanted my name here --Hep 22:58, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Wow. All this discussion and it's still not funny. --Subbes 04:13, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• The discussion is mostly about a prolonged edit-war rather than about making the article funnier. Did you read any of it? --Aussieintn 06:53, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

* Yes, thank you, I did.  The article still doesn't have lulz.--Subbes 18:35, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)