Talk:Thanksgiving

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

I'm considering acting the "factual" template for this, because even though it's satire, the first few sections are actually pretty accurate, according to the more recent history books. Is that okay with people? Slayer of horizontal scroll bars, lulz 05:24, 19 November 2007 (CST)

• What is the factual template? have not seen. --| »⇔«¿ 08:26, 19 November 2007 (CST)
  • The one that says "This article is entirely factual", like the one on BitingBeaver's article. Slayer of horizontal scroll bars, lulz 07:54, 20 November 2007 (CST)
    • Ah yes. Well, I think it's fine without it. Actually, all articles here are supposed to be factual! Some turn out to be less so than others, and just become articles that exemplify all possible stereotypes etc., while perhaps having a penny of fact for every 99 cents of fluff. To me, it seems redundant to use this template. However, I am not attached.. If you think it would be an improvement, then feel free! But the truth is, it's all supposed to be factual! ;^) --| »⇔«¿ 13:27, 20 November 2007 (CST)

The writer of this article is a whiny liberal.--Simia 14:15, 22 November 2007 (CST)

• Still pretty lulzy. But, what would I know, I drank my dinner today!--D-Malice, sexy /b/east 23:21, 22 November 2007 (CST)

[edit] Thanks-whatnow?

They play Christmas carols, like, the day after Halloween the past few years, so the only way anyone knows that Dead Bird Day exists anymore is because some lucky community service workers and whiny Scene kids get almost a whole week off, while my struggling community college-going ass gets anally raeped with homework until said Dead Bird Day.

In other words, should this bullshit about white people destroying yet another culture because they don't have any count anymore to fuckers like me who plan on spending it eating turkey sandwiches and drinking Jager from a sippy-cup? --D-Malice, sexy /b/east 19:59, 19 November 2007 (CST)