Talk:The fieryangel
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
You might think that this article sucks, but it doesn't. Trust me. Wait until I get the whole thing down before you call it crap...Batshitinsanedufusfromhell 17:47, 17 May 2008 (CDT)
- This article is crap. Are you Paul Wehage? You certainly are writing it from his perspective, and then just trying to add "lulz" - he's kind of the hero of your little story here, where you laugh at everyone but him, when he was a serial spammer who continues to spam his company on Wikipedia (at least the French one). So, the hypocrite is the hero, and the "Screaming Opera Queens" (uh, he was using an opera name - so wouldn't he be the screaming opera queen) and the Wikipedia critics (who you seem to think wanted to date him...?) are the bad guys. Okay, Paul...we know you are a "batshit insane dufus from hell" but using ED to make yourself look better is kind of sad.... One only need look at your contributions to see who you are. Or are you just *fascinated* with this one story? --Shankbone 08:54, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- Yes this version may have been written by the real fiery angel, but before that dozens of edits outing and abusing him were here, the familiar-sounding tone of the person calling themselves User:The fieryangel, so, it being rewritten is understandable. Sigh 13:00, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- At least the one under Musik Fabrik written by User:The fieryangel was true, even if abusive (which, you know, ED is not known for being light n' easy). The WR's fieryangel showed himself to be a hypocrite - This one is just crap and whitewashes, "Hmmm...it I throw tit pics in, that'll make the ED guys laugh". So, if ED is here to document internet culture, this article is a fairytale made up by a 45 year old who wants to make himself not look like a hypocrite. And this article is just dumb. --Shankbone 13:08, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- At least, unlike the previous version, it doesn't break the (understandable) site rules on alleging things whilst using people's real names. Sigh 17:17, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- That version using people's real names, aside from historial characters, was long, long gone. Of course, things written by anyone can be reprinted on a not-for-profit blog discussing what was written, with names. Such a blog has already been created. --Shankbone 17:31, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- One of the blogs has already been deleted for violating terms of service.Sigh 18:18, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- That version using people's real names, aside from historial characters, was long, long gone. Of course, things written by anyone can be reprinted on a not-for-profit blog discussing what was written, with names. Such a blog has already been created. --Shankbone 17:31, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- At least, unlike the previous version, it doesn't break the (understandable) site rules on alleging things whilst using people's real names. Sigh 17:17, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- At least the one under Musik Fabrik written by User:The fieryangel was true, even if abusive (which, you know, ED is not known for being light n' easy). The WR's fieryangel showed himself to be a hypocrite - This one is just crap and whitewashes, "Hmmm...it I throw tit pics in, that'll make the ED guys laugh". So, if ED is here to document internet culture, this article is a fairytale made up by a 45 year old who wants to make himself not look like a hypocrite. And this article is just dumb. --Shankbone 13:08, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- Yes this version may have been written by the real fiery angel, but before that dozens of edits outing and abusing him were here, the familiar-sounding tone of the person calling themselves User:The fieryangel, so, it being rewritten is understandable. Sigh 13:00, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
This whole thing is fucking retarded. I'm out --Drunkenlazybastard 14:42, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- Should this and the Musik Fabrik page be merged? --lateral |talk| 17:41, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- There's some discussion on the list concerning these two articles. It will be sorted out. --Drunkenlazybastard 17:47, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- What list? Shankbone 17:52, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- There were twenty emails on the user list about these two articles. --lateral |talk| 18:00, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- I thought 'musik fabrik" had been redirected to here? Because "the fieryangel" is where the real drama is, plus MF is the name of a real person's company? It was redirected- did shankbone aka user:thefieryangel start it again? Sigh 18:18, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- Boy, you Wikipedia Review guys talk about what a shitty site this is, and then you come here when there is drama. "Sigh" - you sound strangely like Greg Kohs, a/k/a Thekohser. And you may remember that Weev said the article could stay. Aside from that, let's not forget that this goes back to ******* and ******* spamming their company across Wikipedia, which is why they got butthurt. I'm doing my own chronicling of their shenanigans, but the article should be Musik Fabrik because that's where the drama started. --Shankbone 18:20, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- That's not what weev says in that post. That was before the article was redirected, and he doesn't mention there anything about redirecting or not redirecting. He's talking about the content of the article. Is there anywhere on site that Weev has mentioned redirection or not? This is the name of a real-world business. I sound like Thekohser? You flatter me. One of the blogs discussing this has already been removed by blogger themselves- no doubt this next one will be if you include there names of people again- as you did above. You have already been told about doing that, I see.Sigh 18:35, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- Not at all. Fox News, Bill O'Reilly, etc. they are all on here. Musik Fabrik spammed their business all over the place. TFA and User:Batshitinsanedufusfromhell used the IP address of Musik Fabrik to edit here. The proof is already out there in diffs - there are no lies. Their real names aren't used in the article. So what, exactly, are you talking about Greg? You act like you know this site's policies, but you haven't edited here before. Ever. --Shankbone 18:40, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- How would you know who has and who hasn't edited here before? Public figures are different from private individuals. Look at all the warnings on your talk pages. You've been warned about using real names, repeatedly. Sigh 19:44, 20 May 2008 (CDT)
- Greg, Paul Wehage is a public figure. He has an article on the English Wikipedia and he has an article on the French Wikipedia. Not only that, he wrote them himself [1][2] . So your argument that he is not a public figure fails two criteria: 1) Paul Wehage himself does not want to be seen as a private, but a public figure; and 2) two different communities in two different languages agreed that he is a notable person. So, what is your argument that a person who writes their own Wikipedia articles, which meet notability criteria is a private individual? Indeed, Wehage is so not public, he has written 13 websites dedicated to himself and has used at least 15 Wiki accounts to spam knowledge about himself. So...how is it that he is a private individual? And why is this utter hypocrite worth your time an consideration? --Shankbone 08:53, 21 May 2008 (CDT)
- How would you know who has and who hasn't edited here before? Public figures are different from private individuals. Look at all the warnings on your talk pages. You've been warned about using real names, repeatedly. Sigh 19:44, 20 May 2008 (CDT)
- Not at all. Fox News, Bill O'Reilly, etc. they are all on here. Musik Fabrik spammed their business all over the place. TFA and User:Batshitinsanedufusfromhell used the IP address of Musik Fabrik to edit here. The proof is already out there in diffs - there are no lies. Their real names aren't used in the article. So what, exactly, are you talking about Greg? You act like you know this site's policies, but you haven't edited here before. Ever. --Shankbone 18:40, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- That's not what weev says in that post. That was before the article was redirected, and he doesn't mention there anything about redirecting or not redirecting. He's talking about the content of the article. Is there anywhere on site that Weev has mentioned redirection or not? This is the name of a real-world business. I sound like Thekohser? You flatter me. One of the blogs discussing this has already been removed by blogger themselves- no doubt this next one will be if you include there names of people again- as you did above. You have already been told about doing that, I see.Sigh 18:35, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
- Boy, you Wikipedia Review guys talk about what a shitty site this is, and then you come here when there is drama. "Sigh" - you sound strangely like Greg Kohs, a/k/a Thekohser. And you may remember that Weev said the article could stay. Aside from that, let's not forget that this goes back to ******* and ******* spamming their company across Wikipedia, which is why they got butthurt. I'm doing my own chronicling of their shenanigans, but the article should be Musik Fabrik because that's where the drama started. --Shankbone 18:20, 19 May 2008 (CDT)
