BUY A SHIRT!
The ED TShirt Shop is open for business! Use discount code ED2009 for 10% off! Click here to shop. ED5 Pollfest is going on now! Register a forums accounts and help us find the best article in the five year history of Encyclopedia Dramatica. Check out the three polls running today: [1] [2] [3]

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

I think this meme died before it was ever born... DramaJason 02:14, 1 September 2007 (CDT)

Contents 1 I've added a how-to 2 I THINK THIS IS EXCELLENT. THANK YOU FOR THIS. AAAA+++++ 3 Pseudo-Science 4 I lol'd 5 NOMINATE SHORT CHEMISTRY STUBS FOR DELETION! 6 Making the Mockery Unclear

I've added a how-to

not that this /really/ matters. --Math-man 16:38, 15 September 2007 (CDT)

I've also wasted my time and added a picture... isn't it nice? Not really. --Math-man 17:13, 15 September 2007 (CDT)

I THINK THIS IS EXCELLENT. THANK YOU FOR THIS. AAAA+++++

--| »⇔«¿ 01:11, 17 November 2007 (CST)

I've been subtly altering figures when reading Wikipedia since 2006 or something, but this is so much better. --Lobo 17:27, 15 February 2008 (CST)

Pseudo-Science

Easily the best and simplest way to vandalise Wikipedia is to create a totally spurious but credible scientific article, using credible images and equations. Massive wikilinking will add much verisimilitude as will the addition of the relevant {{Stub}}. Don't forget to place the article in a Cat as well. Due to the time it takes to create an article that will withstand (cursory) RC Patrol snooping, I have only managed to create 6 such articles, but they're all still there; one of them has been there for over 3 years. I could probably produce more, but frankly I have a life!  :) Avatar 12:15, 6 February 2008 (CST)

I lol'd

I haven't had math in a long time, but I like were this vandalism is going. I occasionally use Wikipedia in my researches, but often just to get the sources and references from articles (They have a good Marketing section, imo). Good work in documenting this. --Illusione 07:12, 15 February 2008 (CST)

NOMINATE SHORT CHEMISTRY STUBS FOR DELETION!

As if their coverage of chemistry couldn't get worse they're deleting tiny stubs because

“	Articles like that are worse than having no article because the bluelinks and appearance in the database fool the reader into thinking that we have an article on the subject when we don't.	„
—[1]

Mind not that the redirect from formula for instance MnO to the actual name ie Manganese(II) oxide and an interwiki link to a much better de.wikipedia article might be the only thing needed.

<big>[[User:☆▢℗⚠⍝〄✈♖☮⧕⚂◵⌆⏏☹|<font style="text-decoration:blink"><font color="red" face="Kristen ITC"><b>☆▢℗⚠⍝〄✈♖☮⧕⚂◵⌆⏏☹</b></font></font>[[User_talk:☆▢℗⚠⍝〄✈♖☮⧕⚂◵⌆⏏☹|<font color="#FF00FF" face="Kristen ITC"><b>☆▢℗⚠⍝〄✈♖☮⧕⚂◵⌆⏏☹</b></font>]][[Special:Contributions/☆▢℗⚠⍝〄✈♖☮⧕⚂◵⌆⏏☹|<font color="blue" face="Kristen ITC"><b>☆▢℗⚠⍝〄✈♖☮⧕⚂◵⌆⏏☹</b></font>]]</big>]] 11:27, 15 February 2008 (CST)

• God fix your signature. --lateral ^|talk| 16:34, 16 February 2008 (CST)

Making the Mockery Unclear

I will cease to do it. Tom Complex 17:22, 15 February 2008 (CST)