Talk:WikiFUD
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
d*mnit... all this work, then when looking up a good ED link for citing sources I find a page that not only has the trolling idea but also has the whole superscript thing too... which I spent half an hour sifting thru Wikipedia to learn how to do >.< Well, I guess I'll have to baleet that section of Citation needed then. Competitors are bad for business.
Oh, and the source for the nesting inline template code can be found here, in case anyone wants to use it in other articles. If you want to re-use it here you should probably just repaste the code. Taemojitsu 23:42, 16 July 2007 (CDT)
- You don't have to censor words here. Pokchu
- habit. Taemojitsu 00:10, 17 July 2007 (CDT)
Would add it to {{WP}} but that category is kind of really bloated right now. So I'm just going to link it from the Wikipedia article. Taemojitsu 00:09, 17 July 2007 (CDT)
- I'll fix it to make it less bloated. Pokchu
- I love doing this. Also good is to introduce ostensibly "serious" edits in historical stuff, & to "cite" old books that do exist, and could be relevant, but absolutely do not assert what you say they do. Yet no-one can find a copy.
Ciphering, not deciphering. Operating illusions. Being illusion to be event. Turning into an enigma what is clear. Making unintelligible what is far too intelligible. Rendering unreadable the event itself. Working all the events to make them unintelligible. Accentuating the fake transparency of the world to spread a terroristic confusion, to spread the germs or viruses of a radical illusion, that is to say operating a radical disillusion of the real. -- J. Baudrillard
--Chankachankaboo 00:31, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
WikiFUDing articles on NGE... a series which is itself, about crystallizing uncertainties to get rid of fear and instill confidence. The irony! <3 Taemojitsu 12:32, 18 July 2007 (CDT)
If anyone cares about this article one idea might be to add the "NPOV" template to it from Wikipedia. I'd do it myself, but 1) I don't want to look like I'm obsessing over this article and 2) how much meta-lulz is too much meta-lulz? Taemojitsu 19:37, 20 July 2007 (CDT)
Please feel free to butcher/rename/completely rewrite this article for the sake of lulz by, for example, replacing it with a single sentence. Taemojitsu 19:14, 30 August 2007 (CDT)
A bit dull. Might be better as a how to guide on how to abuse the tags. Ritegroic 11:39, 5 February 2008 (CST)
