Talk:Wikipedia

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Jump to: navigation, search

This entry should be deleted. Not 'dramatica' enough. --33mhz 12:03, 7 Jan 2005 (GMT)

  • I agree and propose Wikipedia for deletion. --Aussieintn 00:14, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • As much as I'd love to see the IRL Wikipedia disappear, I think the entry is relevant, if only because some people might now be familiar with the source of the site design and source code. --Q\D 00:21, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
      • I respectfully suggest that the above comment misses the point. --Aussieintn 00:24, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
      • I respectfully suggest that Quasidan's mom may have forgotten her vaginal anti-centipedic this morning. Lordly_Assface85
  • Keep A little freshness in the article isn't so bad, is it??? And the part about Jameth typing with his penis is FOMG HilairEEUz!!!111 Keep that part even if we delete the rest... Lordly_Assface85
  • Keep If you don't find this funny, then you are a dunce. PEdro
  • Keep as well because some things shouldn't be extremely dramaticatized.--Modulatum 19:59, 21 Jan 2006 (UTC)
  • I don't know, this article should be kept, but be injected with more lulz.

Hahaha. You guys! --girlvinyl 00:36, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

That's it, I vote to delete Aussieintn and re-redirect Redneck Wonderland to United States where it belongs. --Q\D 00:57, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This needs to say because wikipedia won't let an article about the truth of them stay on their website, so it has to be here. I think wikipedia would be decent if you take every one of their admins and chop off their fingers so they can never use a computer again (same for the people who act like them). Thodin 13:37, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • I also suggest that the comment above completely misses the point and shouldn't be considered. (Hint: Read at least 100 articles, Thodin.) ~ Krade 13:46, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)
    • Why do you say that I miss the point? I already have read a lot of articles before, I just finally decided to make an account to edit. Thodin 14:29, 7 Jul 2005 (UTC)
HOLY SHIT!!! I feel Like a fucktard for reading this. Maximize$ 05:09, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
The infamous lolz turtle.
The infamous lolz turtle.

Strong Strong Strong Strong Strong Strong Strong Strong Strong Strong Strong Strong Strong Strong Strong Delete. WAAAAAAAAA WIKIPEDIA IS SOOOOOOOOOOOOO COOOOLL LOLOL --Jimbo Wales 04:17, 22 Jan 20057 (UTC)

Speedy Baleet TOW is not "noteworthy" Tekjester 23:44, 12 July 2007 (CDT)

Moderate abstain Plinko Commie 22:22, 27 July 2007 (CDT)

Contents

[edit] Formally proposed for deletion

Encyclopedia_Dramatica:Votes_for_deletion/Wikipedia

[edit] re: Banbot's latest edit

Turtlelulz--hardvice (talk) 04:14, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)

[edit] re: embarrassingly stupid drama

what's with the obsession with "original research?" --kh/ what 05:40, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)

  • One of the retarded rules they have specifically to avoid any trace of intelligence. --Banbot talk to Banbot 05:45, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)
    • i scanned the whole talk page and was left wondering what happened to these poor people. it's like they can't laugh at all. --kh/ what 05:54, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)
      • They're not allowed to laugh - that's another completely pointless rule that they have. --Banbot talk to Banbot 06:01, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)
        • that site makes me cry tears of blood and anguish. --kh/ what 06:11, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)
  • I like how they say ED couldn't POSSIBLY be run by a female because the rape article would never be allowed under girl-rule. WTF? Also, there is no way that a female would have the skill or resources to run a wiki. They're misogynist assholes, seriously. --girlvinyl 06:22, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)
    • didn't i start that page or have some devious part in it? you should ban me for being such an insensitive male. --kh/ what 06:58, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)
    • You're just angry they haven't raped you yet. --無 07:31, 20 Aug 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cane Toads

Either I'm prone to laughing at just about anything (a distinct possibility), or there's a movement to fill wikipedia with a kind of sublime farce that can sneak through under moderators' radar. It's getting unnervingly common for me to find things on wikipedia that I might expect to find here, but written as if it takes itself seriously. Is somebody doing this on purpose, or is that just what they're like? --Frowningman 19:16, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Um, me. I'm doing it on purpose. I wrote teh [1] page by making up a load of religious crap that sounded serious. Seriously, Hyldenism doesn't exist. Um, sorry? --Viel 17:18, 6 Feb 2006 (UTC)


Odd, how come nobody ever told Vfd15 about proxies?

[edit] Deletion

why the fuck would you want to delete funny shit like this?

[edit] The Kangaroo photo

This is Anittas, the editor who got banned by Jimbo on Wiki for posting the kangaroo photo. First of all, I was never an admin. I tried to change the statement, but it seems that I got reverted. Anyway, the photo was not taken by me and I don't hold the copyrights. I think the photo was first published on a shock site, but was found in many other places as well. I, for one, first found the photo on a Zone.com forum. --Anittas 10:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

  • I certainly lolled when I saw that picture. --Blu Aardvark 10:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia Furry admins

Is it true that all Wikipedia admins are furfags?-Ket Refill 08:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

It's all true. My friends call me "squirrel-fucker", and it's none of your business if they're the real or the imaginary kind. I totally got drunk and made out with a dog yesterday. -GTBacchus 22:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Pix plz--Quit your whining 22:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What is Wikipedia?

Sounds like some sort've gay porn. Please delete it.--Zen444 10:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

  • It’s a world famous paedophile ring, the CIA are always trying to get it shut down. ~ CATS 22:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I have a dream

It came to me in a dream last night, I finally realised that Wikipedia is just the Usenet for the 21st century – what with pseudo-intellectuals locking horn with each other and not actually working to do anything productive. Maybe if the brainiacs leave Wikipedia it’ll become something more substantial than it is now, ie it’ll get filled up with porn as the case of Usenet. ~ CATS 08:22, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

wikipedia would work if pervs like the ones that decided to do in depth reports on cp seems like they are deffending it when attacking users that oppose it

[edit] Keep this shit

It is royally pissing off King Jimbo and my latest article about the wikimania has him livid. I try to tell them-dude it is just the internet. WikiTerrorist

  • Link as proof? Samsara 19:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] freenode #wikipedia

They love this place [2] ~ CATS 11:39, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

From that I found in http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/irc/6070101.txt

2006-07-01 18:55 < badlydrawnjeff> STARSBarry: I used to edit there before I came to Wiki

2006-07-01 18:56 < badlydrawnjeff> I think i'm still listed as an admin, although I'm never there anymore

Samsara 12:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Onion owns Wikipedia

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/50902

I'm not sure how this would best be incorporated into the article, but someone needs to find a way.

--Trex 00:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Saw it, couldn't think of how, either. Samsara 01:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] the vandalism and the drama

i think i actually prefer the article now. --Kaini 04:52, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Much like when Jimbo Wales was moved to FUCKING FAGGOT!, this vandalism is lol, but screws up the page. So I left some in under the summary section --Kirk Johnson 04:55, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I think this link needs inclusion in this series

Wikireality, WHAT Tfo 22:52, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Help

On Wikipedia you know how they have pictures and how you can upload a new version of that picture to replace it. If for example you did that and uploaded a new version of Jewbo Wales's face that was actually a harlequin fetus would it instantly replace his face? Also would the old version of the picture be gone forever? Any help would be appreciated I don't want to get my 10th sock puppet account banned for nothing. A .45 Cal To Your Head 04:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

  • It would instantly replace but it's revertable by anyone. --Sheneequa • Talk 04:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Thanks. It would still be funny while it lasted. --A .45 Cal To Your Head 04:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
      • Oops, they disabled that recently. Miltopia 08:32, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No!

None of you can go far enough... we need a concerted attempt through network admins worldwide to block traffic to and from wikipedia - I know their distributed architecture makes this troublesome, however I propose "International ban wikipedia day". Every Novemember for at least a month, we watch and see how certain pub quiz teams crumble and burn without their IP enabled phones.

Action needs to be taken, I say we entice in network/sys admins with the promise of beers/fruit juice until we've got them all in our pocket...

[edit] WikiDrama

Someone needs to add a section on This shit. Drama generated in a record amount of time. Lots of lulz.--Thefrayedends 02:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Sign your name, shithead. Blargh 02:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Fuck me! Signed. --Thefrayedends 02:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

It's four tildes, dumbass. User:Blargh 02:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Dammit all! --Thefrayedends 02:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Urban Dictionary def'n

pls 2 be avenging limecat and voting up definition of Wikipedia: "Britannica on the bathroom wall."

[edit] Two: Wikipedians Admit to Vandalising Wikipedia

Ted removed it [3]

Well not that funny until I looked at the account of Hildanknight on Wikipedia. He got banned for a week from TOW for making that statement. [4] RoundHouseKickToTheFace 08:45, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Wikipedia proves that everything Encyclopedia Dramatica says about Wikipedia is actually true

Sometime today, Wikipedia erased the talk page about whether the entry for Encyclopedia Dramatica should be restored, They also protected the page to prevent its re-creation.--Meowy 17:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Becoming your own parody = LOL Tfo 18:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I saw it before it went. Somebody said something like, Hey Meowy, you're a cat lover so you might not like ED after seeing their Kittens articles. Faggot MONGO deleted it, too! AnHeroIsSpeltWrong 06:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC) 
07:17, 15 November 2006 MONGO (Talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:Encyclopedia Dramatica" (talk page of deleted page) 
16:31, 15 November 2006 MONGO (Talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:Encyclopedia Dramatica" (talkpage of deleted page)
    • I saw the page a few days before it disappeared. Consensus seemed to favor restoring the article, so I wondered why Wikipedia hadn't blanked the discussion yet. I saved a copy of the talk page just in case. Should I do something with it? Not Gay Just Thirsty 18:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Strange - on wikipedia today I was able to create a short entry under "encyclopediadramatica" - it just consisted of girlvinyl's definition of the site taken from urbandictionary. It existed for about half an hour, then was gone again and the page blocked. Maybe they had only blocked the name when it was split into two words? BTW, on the kitten page, I don't see a single kitten amongst the gore - so I'm not complaining!--Meowy 00:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Source: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1650635/posts?page=87#87

Wikipedian will say Wikipedians do not support for anything against their ideology and delete/edit anything toward the right.

The problem you mention is pervasive and runs to the highest levels of Wikipedia. Most people know that liberals dominate the site but few people know that this is by design - they actually run the place too.

Wikipedia's sysops and administrator ranks are dominated by a filthy collection of pornographers, homos, perverts, internet predators, and Che-worshipping left wing radicals. They are typically people who have been rightfully rejected from mainstream society for their behavior and have turn to the darkest corners of the internet to continue the same crap that makes society shun them in real life.

Consider the facts:

FACT: This guy is one of the most powerful site administrators on Wikipedia:

MORE FACTS: - Did you know that wikipedia's founder and owner Jimbo Wales made his fortunes as an internet porno magnate?

- Did you know that top level wikipedia sysop Fred_Bauder is a disgraced ex attorney who was forcefully disbarred by the Colorado Supreme Court in a prostitution scandal?

- Did you know that top level wikipedia administrator Kelly_Martin is a "transgendered" activist who was really born a man?

Kelly Martin before & after:

- Did you know that top level wikipedia administrator Tony_Sidaway posts all over the internet about posing as a woman for "cybersex"?

- Did you know that top level wikipedia administrator David Gerard is a 40-something cross-dressing goth in real life?

- Did you know that top level wikipedia administrator Phil_Sandifer was recently investigated by the police after posting a graphic first-person fiction entry on his blog about stalking, raping, and killing a lady?

- Did you know that top level wikipedia administrator Will_Beback is a radical homosexual & Sierra Club activist in California who spends most of his time on wikipedia editing articles about gay themes and bizarre sexual fetishes?

- Did you know that top level wikipedia administrator FCY_Travis is a radical homosexual activist in California who was exposed on wikitruth.info for posting on paedophile-themed diaper fetish websites?

For more about the disgusting group of freaks and radicals who own and run wikipedia see www.wikitruth.info and www.wikipedia-watch.org/hive2.html

These facts are all true, scary as that may be, and they represent the a collection of people from the HIGHEST TIER of Wikipedia's site administration. I tell friends all the time to block wikipedia from their children's computers and all of you should do so too, because it's not just flooded with pervs and freaks. The inmates actually run the wikipedia asylum!


[edit] Buying article space???

Looks like you can buy article space on Wikipedia [5], regardless of how piss poor the article in question is. ~ CATS 10:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Look at the history. You don't even have to disguise the fact that you're editing on behalf of the corporation[6]. ugh. Miltopia 10:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
    • A few editors a threatening to leave over the advert drama [7]. Oh noes!!! ~ CATS 00:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TOW?

  • Why do people keep calling it this? What does TOW stand for? :( Splintax 10:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
    • From my understanding, TOW stands for That Other Wiki. --Blu Aardvark 10:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
      • Thanks, I never knew that! The moar you know!--ByAppointmentTo 00:50, 16 November 2007 (CST)
        • The Online Wiki(pedia), perhaps? --Saf1 11:36, 4 May 2008 (CDT)

[edit] someone from wikipedia deleted my article?

I just created Wikipedia generated Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder today, and it somehow disappeared? so i had to do it again. who did that? can someone find out?--Summer.Thunder 22:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I am out of here.

shit, I spent hours on editing this article. and the other one about Wikipedia generated Obsessive-compulsive disorder, and they all got deleted. i thought that this site was better. man, all my time got wasted for nothing. I am going back to my own personal blog which I am free to publish whatever. what a waste of my time on here today.

  • Bai. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. --Blu Aardvark 23:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wiki Abuse

someone's started an attempt to document admin abuse on Wikipedia using "NPOV". this might be great for lolz but they wont out admins. see http://wikiabuse.com/index.php?title=JoshuaZ&diff=prev&oldid=2916 where they wont even let someone say that JoshuaZ is Joshua Zader the objectivist dating guy! WikiLOLZ 19:39, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

  • See Wiki Abuse for the article if you're interested. --Lateral 19:52, 23 June 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Fuck Wikipedia

It's become progressively worse and worse over the last few months, you have asshole administrators clamping down on people who are seriously trying to improve the entire encyclopedia and yet you have these asshole photo stalkers, who troll your photolog and try and find something wrong with it and then they try and delete it. Personally, Jimbo Wales can suck my left nut for all I care, Fuck him!--JackCox 23:42, 24 June 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Problem

You cant even read half the page. I think there should be an article on Wikipedia, but it shouldn't be crap. Tito 21:09, 10 July 2007 (CDT)

  • The article needs a substantial trim, but the hebrew text should definitely stay. In-joke and all that. --Blu Aardvark 23:00, 10 July 2007 (CDT)
    • I trimmed it a bit. I replaced the random Hebrew text with a Hebrew paragraph about the Protocals of the Elders of Zion, which I think is a little more appropriate given who were dealing with here. The article still needs a lot of work. --Lateral 00:46, 11 July 2007 (CDT)
      • I was wondering what was a Hebrew article doing in ED. The random English wikilinks fucked up the bi-directional flow, so I fixed it up a bit. I hope I didn't completely destroyed it and devoided it of lulz. The wikilinks are all links to the actual equivalent English word on ED, or the closest equivalent I could think of/find. Proaganda 00:40, 17 July 2007 (CDT)

[edit] lulz

only a wikipediphile would try to delete shit here. hahaha --Camper 00:20, 13 July 2007 (CDT)

[edit] wtf

this is encyclopedia dramatica, not wikinerds land. why delete this article? thats just noob Gamesadict 16:41, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

  • It's called satire. Come on, do you really think we are about to delete this? --Blu Aardvark 17:50, 23 July 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Nice sites to add on wikipedia

Add these in the article, fun! http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/thumb/0/09/Stealth_pedo.jpg/180px-Stealth_pedo.jpg http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/2/2d/Wikipedophilia.jpg

[edit] Wikitruthguy

90% of your edits here are shit, man. It's supposed to be satirical humour, not furious nerd-frustration. --Lobo 12:00, 26 August 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Vandalism

I am a Wiki Admin and I love vandalising TOW. Today, I made 4 edits that should comprehensively fuck up some kid's school project. Couldn't care less - perhaps they should learn to use Google or maybe read a few books? Avatar 06:27, 25 October 2007 (CDT)

  • Which Wikipedia admin are you? Ritegroic 06:57, 25 October 2007 (CDT)
    • Yeah, right! :) Avatar 07:05, 25 October 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Fucking moronic quotes

You guys see this shit on TOW now, rite? Those shifting quotes at the top of the page, with gems liek "Wikipedia is a great tool for research (FUCKING LOL)." Srsly, we need something similar to mock this crap. - Eatenbyrobots 23:06, 29 October 2007 (CDT)

  • LOL if you have a paper to write and you attribute anything to TOW you pretty much fucked yourself into getting a F. lolololol I wonder how many millions of dipshits have written an essay or paper and cited wikipedia.... shit it scares me... Wiseblood 23:26, 29 October 2007 (CDT)
  • One of my teachers, back when I was an underageB&, requested her class to use it as a source. If only someone had done their Social Studies paper on Mediacrat . . . - Eatenbyrobots 02:54, 31 October 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Laughable faggotry

A few of the quotes seen on TOW's Wikimedia "GIV US UR JEW GOLD PLZ" pledge drive banner:

"Go, baby, go, go!" - Anonymous (LOL THEY KNO IRUNY)
"This site is too important not to support, education is freedom" - William Tinney (FREEDOM IS SLAVERY)
"Even my cats like it!" — Anonymous (Please die, fgt)
"Knowledge is power, don't waist it." — Anonymous (sic)
"I would have failed so many classes without wiki!" — Anonymous (Oh don't worry, you fail just fine)
"Wonderful site! I recommend it to all of my students." — Michael Richardson (what)
"This is one of mankind's greatest undertakings." — Dr. Tobias Gantner (SFB LOL)
"The greatest internet invention since the internet itself." — Ronald Yuan (Unwarranted self-importance)
"Still the freshest, most accurate content on any subject" (INSTANT LOLLERCAUST)
"What did we do before wiki?" - Anonymous (WE READ BOOKS)

These fgts paid IRL money to look like morons and/or blaspheme Anon's good name - Eatenbyrobots 03:46, 31 October 2007 (CDT)


They care about the child in Africa. --Htr 05:39, 31 October 2007 (CDT)

  • Oh yeah Jimbo, you mean the one with the flies on his face? I remember now. - Eatenbyrobots 02:18, 1 November 2007 (CDT)

[edit] interesting The Register article on Wikipedia censorship.........

.....

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/

Jpopwhore 06:28, 8 December 2007 (CST)


[edit] Small Lulz

If anyone has ever wanted to see someone call the Fresh Prince an "uncle tom" just go to the show's wikipedia page edit history.

Small Lulz Update, Different Subject: The Swimming Pool article has a minor debate going on over wether or not pools are good for holding water. Also, someone said there were AIDS or something like that.

[edit] Vandalism

I'm going to vandalize wikipedia by replacing every page I come across with a wall of text that says "faggots" over and over again--PhantoMatt 19:53, 6 February 2008 (CST)

Nevermind, it didn't work.--PhantoMatt 20:16, 6 February 2008 (CST)

  • I, too, enjoy failing immensely like you, good sir. --Saf1 15:08, 4 May 2008 (CDT)


[edit] awesome vandalism

Hey guys im looking for some great and fantastic ways to create vandalism on wikipedia. my goal is to take it down. I wrote on an admins user page that i was trying to become and admin so that i could create suck puppet accounst and get pages locked so that i, as an admin, can then edit the pages to mess with people and "push my own views". I hope this will caus elots of lulz. let me know any good ways to vandalize. thanksa bunch and ill keep everyone posted.--The master vandal 13:43, 10 February 2008 (CST)

Ok, good luck with that. Have fun getting blocked in the first 10 minutes. See vandalism for techniques. --lateral |talk| 18:37, 11 February 2008 (CST)

[edit] Funny Shit, Look at this shit

So the admins at wikipedia have their own facebook page. Read the description and how to get in. You basically have to jack-off another admin then they let you in. This is a great group one of us needs to infiltrate.

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2208765202


[edit] Moar Vandalism

I'd like to ask people to post up vandalism so that failfags can learn and not be failfags. So, can you post up vandalims so that failfags can learn and not be failfags?

Prime example: http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k207/ThunderChao/Shining1.jpg http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k207/ThunderChao/Shining2.png --NotSoLulzy, 22:44 May 22, 2008

  • Are you suggesting those are good or bad? Cause I think they're pretty funny. I actually use Weegee all the time when vandalizing the Italian Wikipedia. ~ Endedrural (talk) 01:52, 27 May 2009 (CDT)
  • I'm trying to use those as a good example, so people won't fail. So, yeah, I think they're good. I should try and elaborate next time so I won't look like a retard --NotSoLulzy

[edit] Fucking Nazi Website

I try to make my account on Wikipedia nice looking and pristine, linking to my favorite websites with my other accounts, such as this worship-worty website. Get this, after all my penning and planning about, I get a message that my account page won't work because ED is blacklisted!!!!! Now who the fuck do these dildofingers think they are, monitoring and regulating peoples' personal accounts??? DarthBotto talk•cont 20:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hebrew Shit

Didn't catch the joke at first. However, the Jews chicken scriblings can't be translated online for free (surprise). As long as somebody known put it up in the first place and it's not edited, that's cool - but I had deleted it for just that worry - the WikiJews would replace the text with something not seen by people who don't understand their piss-in-the-snow writing

[edit] pedophilia confirmed

https://secure.wikileaks.org/wiki/Did_the_Wikimedia_Foundation_lie_about_muzzling_Wikinews%3F Hippopotamus 22:30, 9 August 2008 (CDT)

Retrieved from "http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Talk:Wikipedia"
Personal tools