Talk:Wikipedophile

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Npov?

I'm new to this site... encyclopedia dramatica, but does it try to maintain NPOV? I think this article is pretty biased...for one, to class all Wikipedians in with pedophiles is silly. Wikipedia+phile doesn't become Wikipedophile, it would become Wikiphile, or Wikipediphile, or Wikipediaphile. Basically, wikipedophile = wikipedia + pedophile, or wiki+pedophile, since they're probably not only there. Mind if I change? -Tyciol 02:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

We maintain a strict NPOV. All biased contributors are immediately banned forever. This article is about wikipedians who happen to be obsessive with wikipedia and also obsessed with having sex with children. Some very unbiased research (not yet published) has proven there is almost a 100% correlation between bureaucratic fuckery and sexually predatory behavior. I'm sure this doesn't surprise a knowledgable, experienced person like yourself. It's not as if you are an innocent virgin, right? If you get my drift... Right? ;-) Yeah, you know what I mean. --Jacknstock 02:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

NPOV in a satyrical website? Ha! oh, fuck, Jacknstock beat me by 8 minutes. --Sheneequa 02:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Crapcakes boys, I made up the word Wikipedophile on my own because I was thinking 'pedo' and wikipedia and it just came to me, but obviously it came to others first. I did not know of the satire! Also yeah, virgin. Well, unless my pants are a woman. They could be. Tyciol 03:25, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

HA! VIRGIN! We kill and eat virgins here, but not before we rape them... which paradoxically means they are no longer virgins, so we can't kill and eat them. BUT if they WERE still virgins after the raping, you can be sure that we would mercilessly kill them, grind them into hamburger, grill them, add salt, pepper and ketchup, and then eat them on sesame seed buns. --Jacknstock 03:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

I am comforted that do to the ordering of your travesties I will not be cannibalized, but due to the description, it sounds like I'll still be raped. On the other hand, are you only raping under the pretense of food preparation, in which case, you won't, since you won't be eating me? Tyciol 14:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Bah, format

I got an excellent little screecap from here but no matter where I stick it in the article, it gets stuck next to the userbox. Any explanations (besides me being st00pit)--Quit _{your whining} ^{or I'll use these} 21:30, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

• Upload the pic, we can get it placed. fuckface 15:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Whoops, that was the old comment.fuckface 15:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Trivia section

• Can someone find the article where it says something like "He had a nice Christmas, jeesh" where a wikipedo spends their Christmas harassing people over image uploading. I started this section for it and then I couldn't find it after many searching and had to instead put some other stuff that came up while I searched. BLANKING IN PROGRESS 04:55, 14 July 2007 (CDT)
  • It would help if you could remember their screen name. Wait are you talking about that cunt Carnildo? Thats the only person I could think of. ~~~~ ( ! | ?| * ) 12:47, 14 July 2007 (CDT)
    • No ED article found for him. It was an ED article that had the link. BLANKING IN PROGRESS 13:53, 14 July 2007 (CDT)
      • Could it be J Di? That mentions something about Christmas. ~~~~ ( ! | ?| * ) 14:02, 14 July 2007 (CDT)

Is this still lulz?

I remember this article being of a less serious tone before, now it doesn't even have any jokes. Lolicyst 21:20, 25 September 2007 (CDT)

Moralizing

How come when I said it was wrong some editor at wikipedia said I was "moralising" and "some ppl might like CP so it has to sho no POV"? Souljaman 15:16, 27 November 2007 (CST)