Template talk:Gaiaonline
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
[edit] Delete this shit
Keeping this shit around is like leaving ED's asshole wide open for thousands of gaians to fill with their faggotry. Once upon a time, 4chan was gaiafag-free too. 
Ninja 12:44, 23 November 2007 (CST)
- I don't care if it stays one way or another, but please don't put {{baleetplz}} on a template page unless you throw in noinclude tags because then every single page that has the template gets marked for deletion. --WM 13:03, 23 November 2007 (CST)
- Actually, please don't put {{baleetplz}} on a template page unless there are no pages it is included on. I'm not about to remove all reference to this template from every article it has been placed on simply because you've decided you don't want it around anymore. You remove the references, then mark the template. In the meantime, I've blanked the page, which has the same effect as deletion except it doesn't leave a little red link on every fucking article still referencing it. --Blu Aardvark 15:01, 23 November 2007 (CST)
- Come on, we had Clementine as an Article of the Now several days ago (with the template intact) and nobody gave a shit about it then. If you want to argue that there shouldn't be so many blanks for people to fill in, then fine, go ahead and fix that part, but to argue that there shouldn't be a Gaiaonline template period is bullshit. Besides, most gaiafags on there don't even realize how to sign up here. I'd say we're safe. --Jigsaw 17:08, 23 November 2007 (CST)
- You know, I'm sorry. For some reason, I read it as if Ninja was the author. "Propogation of gaiafaggotry" is not sufficient reason to delete this template, "Author wants this gone because he thinks it's a bad idea" very well may be. I would recommend not actually pushing this template into the article space until we've got articles on the subjects, though. Wikipedia likes redlinks all over the place, but honestly, that's generally a Bad Thing. --Blu Aardvark 17:29, 23 November 2007 (CST)
- I'll try to do a little more soon to help tighten up the anus, but apology accepted. :) --Jigsaw 19:01, 23 November 2007 (CST)
- You know, I'm sorry. For some reason, I read it as if Ninja was the author. "Propogation of gaiafaggotry" is not sufficient reason to delete this template, "Author wants this gone because he thinks it's a bad idea" very well may be. I would recommend not actually pushing this template into the article space until we've got articles on the subjects, though. Wikipedia likes redlinks all over the place, but honestly, that's generally a Bad Thing. --Blu Aardvark 17:29, 23 November 2007 (CST)
