User talk:Azathar

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

[edit] Does anyone actually read this entry?

Does anyone actually read this entry besides me and like three of you, who seem to only read it when I change something? I'm just curious... it says like 200 or so times at the bottom, but how many of those views are mine?--Azathar 04:48, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• I think we each viewed it exactly fifty times. --quasi`DAN 04:50, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • So, that means 4 ppl have viewed the article. There's no lulz here. Maybe I'm getting too old if I don't find it funny.--Azathar 04:52, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] masturb8r template

The bad grammar is the only thing that makes this joke funny.hardvice

• THANK YOU. --quasi`DAN 04:40, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • AT least get rid of the groups I am not in anymore.--Azathar 04:40, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] MUSHs, MUDs, and MOOs

Your MUSHs, MUDs, and MOOs category wasn't the only category I eliminated today. We don't need more categories at this time, especially not categories with only one article, and TinyTIM doesn't require a category all to itself. If you want to be useful, try categorizing some of the uncategorized pages into the existing categories.

If you can find several uncategorized pages that can't fit in the existing categories but could all fit in one new category, maybe that would be the time to consider creating a new category. However, so the whole categorization thing doesn't become a complete mess, it would be best if you first proposed the new category to Girlvinyl

I'm not even sure your TinyTim article belongs in ED. It doesn't provide any lulz or relate to any entertaining drama. SHOW ME THE LULZ! --Aussieintn 06:57, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Masturb8r template

It says to remove the Masturb8r template after edits contradicting everything, not after edits to "get rid of some unnecessary stuff!" --Aussieintn 03:35, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• whatever, keep it there then.--Azathar 03:37, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • hehehe --Aussieintn 03:39, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • I will now proceed to contradict everything.
    • The trick is to contradict everything while leaving the previous version more-or-less intact. --Aussieintn 04:03, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
      • I did. I pretty much just added "not" to the beginning of every other word. Easy to revert. --Q^\DAN 04:04, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
        • Nice job. I guess it won't be funny for long, but it's funny for now. --Aussieintn 04:05, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
          • It's funny only if people compare versions like so. --Q^\DAN 04:08, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
            • It's not funny if you explain the joke. --無 & Ghostlight 04:10, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
              • So let's not explain the joke. --Aussieintn 04:12, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
              • But then people might not get how hilarious I am. --Q^\DAN 04:13, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
                • They'll hate you anyway. --Aussieintn 04:14, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
                  • How can anyone hate me? My signature is in color now! --Q^\DAN 04:20, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
                    • The ideal response to your color signature immediately occurs to me... --Aussieintn 04:21, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
                      • If it doesn't involve heavy unexplained bleeding then you're immediately wrong. --Q^\DAN 13:13, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)