greets to the final bosses of internet: cromlech, aush0k, dshocker, atomiku, Romford trev, piddle, rolo, baz.

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Contents 1 Welcome 2 y halo thar 3 Hello 4 Please Read This 5 You obviously have no sense of humour 6 feel free 6.1 Reply 7 MEMES 8 PROTIP 9 HELLO THAR 10 ED:SysopApp 11 BBWChan 12 New Template 13 Gordon Brown 14 Amy Winehouse 15 Where Where We? 16 Olympic Flame 17 Olympic Flame 18 Nice Job! 19 Africa and others... 20 Thanks and Congrats :) 21 Oops! 22 Wikipedia vandals 23 FFA 24 Featured Article 25 Tea 26 Ye of Little Faith 27 It's That Time Again 28 Grawp 29 You are hereby awarded 5 internets 30 Welcome 31 Your Banhammer 32 First Day on the Job 33 Grawp 34 Jeremy Kyle 35 r9k 36 i like you 37 LT article 38 Wat 39 Thanks for the advice 40 Ahhh 41 Whoa There, Tiger 42 Fbr trash 43 OldDirtyBtard is oooooooooold. 44 Lazy 45 TOW Drama 46 My userpage 47 Rickroll 48 Hey 49 User:UR 50 My userpage 51 Hey Thar 52 WP:AN 53 Wikipedia article 54 Sceptre 55 Pics 56 Thanks 57 UR 58 Jana Shearer 59 Josef 60 UR 61 Niggertitsapedia 62 As appealing as wielding a banhammer sounds... 63 How to AOTN 64 You want to get Encyclopedia Dramatica an article on Wikipedia? 65 As a compromise 66 Well 67 WP Article 68 ED article 69 Deletions 70 Wiki Template 71 Porn 2.0 72 DOA Wikipedos 73 /b/lackup 74 AotN 75 nice 76 Sick Fuck Chick 77 LaraLove 78 Pikachu Sig 79 Sig 80 sup

[edit] Welcome

Hello, ByAppointmentTo/Archive

THIS IS SERIOUS; READ IT.

Congratulations on joining ED! You probably fit into one of these categories:

1. New User

Before making your first article look over ED:101. Try checking out random articles and fixing typos, grammar and/or bullshit where you find them before trying to make a new page. To start with, make multiple small edits to different articles until you have the hang of it. If you don't, it is unlikely that your article will survive for more than sixty seconds and you risk being molested by ED Sysops.

If you don't know anything about wiki formatting and code, please read ED:BASIC and the Style Guide. Take your time and start slowly.

2. Mediawiki Migrant If you're an experienced wiki user (probably from a Wikipedia offshoot) who knows how to operate, please read ED:101 for offical policy and ED:MIGRANT for tips on assimilation and basic rules.

Whichever you are, to successfully contribute to ED, please take some time to look around, note why other people get banned and don't act like they did.

Communication with other users prevents misunderstandings and can be done through talk pages, TJC and the mailing list.

If you plan on sticking around, feel free to make your mark on the ED:Map and join the ED Facebook, the ED Myspace and the ED Bebo.

---

[edit] y halo thar

You've been making a lot of unfunny edits on good articles like Secks and adding incorrect redirects. So:

YOU NEED TO EDIT LESS AND LURK MOAR While you're lurking, plz 2 read ED:101, and play with the sandbox.

--WM 17:12, 12 June 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Hello

Have you written any articles yet? Plz2be showing if you have. --Pokchu 10:14, 27 August 2007 (CDT)

[edit] Please Read This

KTHNXBI ~ CATS 06:30, 28 August 2007 (CDT)

[edit] You obviously have no sense of humour

get the fuck out —The preceding comment was added by Underwank, who is too much of a faggot to sign his or her own posts. IT'S 4 TILDES (~), NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!

[edit] feel free

to delete it (bnp)

• I put the tag on the article for a reason. The old article was much better, now it just contains no internet humour and fails ED:LULZ and looks like Uncyclopedia crap. I can't delete it because I'm not an admin, we should revert the article back to its old state which contains references to internet humour.--ByAppointmentTo 06:43, 29 October 2007 (CDT)

HEY THERE! Hey, ByAppointmentTo/Archive! I saw what you did with Criteria for speedy deletion I just wanted to say keep up the good work

--| »⇔«¿ 23:38, 8 November 2007 (CST)

• Wow, my first ever positive response! Cool thx.-ByAppointmentTo 23:40, 8 November 2007 (CST)

[edit] Reply

Hello, I replied to your question on my discussion page.VandalFucker 07:57, 11 November 2007 (CST)

[edit] MEMES

Actually, I like it, but that usually means that it will fail as a meme. Ask Burk, or try to force it yourself. Tfo_{Talk to me}^{Listen to me.} 16:20, 20 November 2007 (CST)

[edit] PROTIP

http://diy.despair.com/motivator.php

--OldDirtyBtard 22:14, 11 December 2007 (CST)

Already started using it to make stuff. Thanks!--ByAppointmentTo 22:30, 11 December 2007 (CST)

[edit] HELLO THAR

HEY THERE! Hey, ByAppointmentTo/Archive! I saw what you did with Uncyclopedia I just wanted to say keep up the good work

I was wondering when it would turn to a more ED-worthy article. Kudos. HedgeJew 12:28, 20 December 2007 (CST)

[edit] ED:SysopApp

Clicking the above, filling it out, and e-mailing it to one of the active admins will probably work. Or so rumor has it. FYIAD 16:21, 6 March 2008 (CST)

• Yesh...we aren't in immediate need but your contribs have not gone unnoticed (especially in the field of /b/tardery). I actually meant to email and ask you to fill out an application after seeing your Talk:Main Page comment but your Special:Emailuser/ByAppointmentTo isn't activated; make it so number one. --OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 23:13, 9 March 2008 (CDT)

[edit] BBWChan

It looks fine to me. It has enough pix (perhaps too many, lol), a decent amount of lulz. Why did you ask me? HedgeJew 18:40, 6 March 2008 (CST)

[edit] New Template

I may be a little biased because I spent an hour cleaning up templates today, but it would probably be better for you to put the code on your userpage instead of making a template for it. White•Mystery

[edit] Gordon Brown

It isn't protected, you should be able to edit it. What is it telling you? Tfo_{Talk to me}^{Listen to me.} 14:25, 25 March 2008 (CDT)

• Try now, lol. Tfo_{Talk to me}^{Listen to me.} 15:26, 25 March 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Amy Winehouse

Have a peek at the Needed page. The Amy Winehouse article was one of the very few music articles that the sysops wanted to see recreated, in a different form. If you have a desire to re-write it, I can make the old page text available to you. White•Mystery

Hey, WhiteMystery's out of the house at the moment. I've put the Whinehouse article in your userspace. I think we basically agree with you that the article's amusing, but we just whacked most of the music category for lacking internets or being crap and we're really not interested in setting a precedent for repopulating the category. If you could rewrite it a little and add some internet relevance, that'd be cool. - Jasper _Jasper @ _MeowMail.com 22:21, 27 March 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Where Where We?

Sorry for the late response. I got a bit, er, distracted IRL. I'm not sure when the next round of Sysops is but would still like you to fill out an application. Cheers mate. --OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 12:26, 5 April 2008 (CDT)

• Arrested on a felony 422 (making criminal threats) warrant filed by a COS fag who told LAPD that I threatened to kill him. I was only in for about 10 hours (in a Versace suit, in a holding cell full of Latino ganbangers in wifebeaters) before I made bail. I found a bond company to cover the $50,000 bail just before they were gonna put us on a bus to the county jail fro the w/end. Once there, I would have had to wait 3 days to appear before a judge and have a bail hearing.

tl;dr? Don't get arrested on a w/end. And if you think there's a chance that you 'are' gonna get arrested, bring a sweatshirt when you leave the house; it was freezing in there.

--OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 12:59, 5 April 2008 (CDT)

• • England? HAHAHA. I wish. --OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 13:05, 5 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Olympic Flame

Srsly, what the fuck does this article have to do with anything? Please justify it's relevant to ED, citing ED:LULZ where appropriate. --Hoveround 13:10, 5 April 2008 (CDT)

• Okay, I see what you did there now. Did you want to link to the thread, or an archive/cap thereof? I can see the potential etc. --Hoveround 13:30, 5 April 2008 (CDT)

• I like it. When I'm on my lunch break later and can get a few minutes in a row, I'll queue it up for the next available spot. Or did you mean AOTN today? White•Mystery

• I'll check with the sysop who put up Alcohol in just a bit and, if they don't mind, I'll put it up for today and bump Alcohol back. Thanks for the heads up. White•Mystery

[edit] Olympic Flame

I'll put it in there in a bit cos I is busy innit (unless somebody beats me to it). BTW: Did you see the footage of the person who tried to put it out with a fire extinguisher from London yesterday? Lulz. --OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 13:56, 6 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Nice Job!

HEY THERE! Hey, ByAppointmentTo/Archive! I saw what you did with BLP I just wanted to say keep up the good work

Would love to see this continue to grow. What do you need to further the article that we can help you get? White•Mystery

[edit] Africa and others...

I saw what you posted on Yirimyah's talk page, and I'd just like to say I agree with you completely. I feel that he overstepped his boundaries by about half a mile in deleting all of those articles. I would just wait it out and see what happens, but if those articles aren't restored soon, I'll try to get a sysop to restore them. I just thought I'd say something, as it's nice to see someone who feels the same way as I do about all of this. Also, I just took a look at your Amy Winehouse article. Good job! That should probably be moved over to a real article, but again, it might be better to wait out all this "improvement drive" stuff first.
Regards, Endedrural _(talk)

• Hey, obviously you two can't see the deleted pages, but Google should have a cache of most of these. If you'd like to provide feedback about which of the locations you'd like to see back, please do so somewhere - here, my talk page, someplace. - Jasper _Jasper @ _MeowMail.com 13:38, 15 April 2008 (CDT)
• If you happen to want the text of any of the pages restored to your userspace, just holler. I'm happy to oblige because you guys know what you're doing and can do good things with them. White•Mystery

[edit] Thanks and Congrats :)

For good work today and all around great work on ED, I want to award you the:

The sysops want you to know that we appreciate the time and energy you put into the site. Thanks <3 White•Mystery

• I agree completely. We have a goal to prune categories like gaming and anime that have a lot of bad articles, but by no means do want to wipe out entire categories. What happened this morning was, as I understand, a misunderstanding that is hopefully rectified now. Just so you're aware, I'll be sending out messages to the Users list about series improvement drives. The procedure I want to take is to notify people of articles that will probably be deleted and make the offer to move it to their userspace so they can work on it, and we can bring it back later, like we did with Amy Winehouse in your case. I hadn't really considered sending out a message making that offer before you spoke up last time, but I'm glad you did because it helped me improve that process. Please continue to speak up when something is wrong because you're 2/2 right now :) White•Mystery

[edit] Oops!

Didn't mean to cuntpaste all that stuff again boss. Only meant to add the Bill Cosby section but someone else had updated it before I clicked update and when I used the backspace to get my post back, I ended up with bowlfulls of copypasta. My bad. Can anyone else smell Fanny? 14:56, 15 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Wikipedia vandals

Hi I have been reading your article Grawp, and I am just wondering do other well known wikipedia vandals warrant ED articles? I am sure Molag Bal had one but it got deleted because it was shit but it could be re-written again better, even though I didn't make it, you've done quite well on Grawp so would you be up for making that one and a few others? Albertluque 09:01, 16 April 2008 (CDT)

Ok that's fine, Molag Bal is about as lulzworthy as Grawp as I can prove this by this page, I know enough to create an article, I just don't know the guidelines very well and I don't want it to be labelled "shit" or deleted. Albertluque 10:50, 16 April 2008 (CDT)

see, Molag Bal I've added some detail and lulz in. Albertluque 12:34, 16 April 2008 (CDT)

well you are entitled to your opinion, I need to learn ED a bit more, but thanks for your advice anyway. Albertluque 12:49, 16 April 2008 (CDT)

Tell me what you think of this article Mr oompapa. I got a pic in and I am getting the hang of ED:LULZ now. Albertluque 12:14, 18 April 2008 (CDT)

It is more about a sockpuppet who was a sockpuppeter had over 9000 sockpuppets, he kind of overtook Molag Bal and is a lot more known, I think I will redirect Molag Bal to that article. Albertluque 12:30, 18 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] FFA

I think it's a good start and definitely one of the best fetish articles we have! If you really want to nail it, we are attempting to increase our LiveJournal coverage back to its old levels - do you know if there are any LJ communities dedicated to FFA, or FFA fanfics, or anything like that? Either way, I would like to put it on ED:GNA once you're happy with it. White•Mystery

• Awesome! Are you already on the ED Users mailing list? If you don't have any objections, I'd like to send out a short note and see if anyone is familiar with LJ communities on the topic. Let me know, and I'll try to get you some more info for the article ASAP. White•Mystery

[edit] Featured Article

Please tell me when you are happy with it. I would like to front page that article and Grawp for the next available slots ASAP. White•Mystery

[edit] Tea

I saw wat u did thar, and I lol'd. <3 Tfo_{Talk to me}^{Listen to me.} 18:35, 18 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Ye of Little Faith

I would hardly say it's ineffective. I've added vandalism detection heuristics to the bot in the past and I can do it again. If vandals can adapt, so can I. Be more optimistic. White•Mystery

• If you happen to speak to our TOW vandal friend, please pass along my apologies for him getting caught in the crossfire this morning. I don't think he did that and I didn't realize that until I went over the logs. White•Mystery
• That is what I've been able to deduce. Grawp leaving the guy a comment calling him a faggot for not doing the vandalism right - I missed that the first time through and then saw it later on and it put up a big red flag for me, so I unblocked Grawp immediately. I look forward to your Wikipedia articles. Every one so far has been a great read. Let me know when it's up because I'll probably front page it, too :) White•Mystery
• Let's play it safe - get a copy on your personal machine and then I'll flush what's currently on ED. Afterwards, I'll chat with some other sysops (I know zero about legal things so I'm not qualified to give any advice) and we can go from there. White•Mystery

[edit] It's That Time Again

Plox to be filling this out and getting to me asap. olddirtybtard@gmail.com --OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 13:33, 20 April 2008 (CDT)

• Will do. I just fixed the intro to the application form. You should read it again for what we're actually looking for in a Sysop. I'm not sure how many GV is going to pick but you are now officially on the radar.

--OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 14:33, 20 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Grawp

I missed this whilst incarcerated. This is some MOTHERFUCKING EPIC WIN SIR!.

HEY THERE! Hey, ByAppointmentTo/Archive! I saw what you did with Grawp I just wanted to say keep up the good work

/me doffs cap. --OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 22:13, 20 April 2008 (CDT)

We (the sysops collectively) killed it originally because it was too long and basically mindless racism with no humor value. It honestly was an embarassment to the site and we didn't want people thinking that was what ED is about. That article was the reason we added "ED is not Hitler's Uncyclopedia" to the list on ED:NOT. We attemped to bring it back several times and, each time, someone would revert back to the long, unfunny version. We all got annoyed with it enough that we just said fuck it and protect it rather than reverting it every 15 minutes. However, we put the offer out on the list that if anyone wanted to rewrite it and make it good, funny, and internet relevant, that we'd gladly put their changes on the page. If it makes you feel any better, I think the white people page is also a giant piece of shit and doesn't really belong, but there is continuous drama over deletions so it's been left alone. White•Mystery

[edit] You are hereby awarded 5 internets

For indirectly producing the following quote:

"I don't think threads like this are what's feeding Grawp so much as an Encyclopedia Dramatica article I saw on him (which essentially lists every single "Grawp quote" he's ever made). I wish that they would have some common sense and delete it (I also regret having put my image in the public domain, as someone uploaded it for use on that page)."--Urban Rose 12:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

ED 1 TOW 0 White•Mystery

[edit] Welcome

(User rights log); 02:15 . . Ajt (Talk | Contribs | Rape) (changed group membership for User:ByAppointmentTo from (none) to sysop, checkuser)

--Ajt 21:17, 22 April 2008 (CDT)

Gratz! - Jasper 21:21, 22 April 2008 (CDT)

BRACE FOR HAZING

 --Drunkenlazybastard 21:25, 22 April 2008 (CDT)

Welcome to the team! Once we get you all set up to communicate with the other sysops, we'll get you any information you might need on your newfound toys. White•Mystery

[edit] Your Banhammer

Enjoy it.--Entropy 05:18, 23 April 2008 (CDT)

• You can never get rid of to much shit. --Entropy 05:31, 23 April 2008 (CDT)
• Feel the power. --Entropy 06:07, 23 April 2008 (CDT)
• Congrats on the banhammer-wielding privilege, man. You deserve it. HedgeJew 10:27, 23 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] First Day on the Job

I took a peek at the logs and I think you're doing a great job so far. The only rule I can give you as far as deletes go is that if something is older than you and you're not sure what it is, check with someone like ODB or even weev if it's before ODB's time. Of the active sysops, I think that weev is the only one that's been here from the very beginning. As far as blocks go, you're doing great there, too. If you spend any time watching Recent Changes during the week you build up quite a kill count. The suggested block durations I have on ED:RC are my preferences - but as you can tell, I'm one of the most lenient sysops unless we're in the middle of a big vandalism spree or I wake up to see that someone called me a fag on my talk page :)

One thing you wouldn't know since you just got on the list - by default SecurityBot blocks for 1 day just in case the block was in error. The heuristics are set so conservatively that this is unlikely, but I wanted to be safe. Most people it blocks deserve a lot more so if you see it block someone before you get them, feel free to unblock and reblock for a longer duration.

TLDR version: You're doing a great job so far and I'm really happy you're on the team. Your recent articles are evidence that you know 100% what ED is about and should be about. Wield your hammer as you will and if there's a problem, we'll give you a heads up. Feel free to ask here or on the list if you need a hand with anything. If you want to try your hand at any of the featured content (AOTN, POTN, etc.), let me know, and I'll put something together for you quick. White•Mystery

=

[edit] Grawp

I've added this screenshot to the Grawp article. Turns out Urban rose has seen the article and regrets uploading her picture! Albertluque 14:52, 23 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Jeremy Kyle

I would personally leave it in the main namespace if I'd run into it by chance and I think that since you have aspirations to improve it, it should definitely stay there. Now that's not to say that you shouldn't snag a copy for yourself in case someone comes along and flushes it, but if you don't mind working on it in the company of others, I'd leave it where it is. If the fanbase of the show is anything like Dr. Phil or Jerry Springer over here, the forums or anything else online related to the show is probably a festering pile of shit ripe with drama, and perfect for an article! White•Mystery

[edit] r9k

I unbanned him and redid his edits because his binary is actually pretty lol. He posted the first chapter of the book of revelations in binary. it's a bit tl;dr in binary, we can replace it eventually, but the orig that was posted there was scrambled in translation after the first sentence and made no sense. --Drunkenlazybastard 17:22, 23 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] i like you

you're my new favorite sysop. smoke crack and burn synagogues, okay? --oh the rorror 18:11, 23 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] LT article

Hey, you did the right thing there. If you can salvage the article, that's always best, but if you're left with one sentence after all personal info is removed, just flush it. Typically a warning or a short warning ban is good. Usually the second time that someone creates a personal army page I give them a few months off. BTW, several of us were chatting last night and wanted you to know that you're doing a kickass job and to keep up the good work! White•Mystery

• Typically I'd flush them, but they look to me like they were created by her, so I'd say let them alone for now. If she comes and complains, we'll remove them. You might want to leave the guy a message clarifying that any srs information like a home address being posted will get him a vacation. White•Mystery

[edit] Wat

These two idiots, Blee and Kreator seem to be carrying on a conversation through their edits on various pages. I saw you editing not too long ago so I assume you're still on and can talk beat some sense in to them. --Kevman459 07:42, 25 April 2008 (CDT)

Oh hai again. Pls to be banning Special:Contributions/Kurgan-fuck_666 and flushing the pages he created? Securitybot keeps reverting me as the vandal when i try to tag them with the baleetplz template. --Kevman459 06:30, 26 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Thanks for the advice

Hello there, thanks for the advice, and the warning, most appreciated. Apologies again, I'll check the pictures more carefully for docs in future. --Mary Poppins 13:41, 25 April 2008 (CDT)

No need to facepalm, I appreciate the advice in general. Have a great evening/local time. --Mary Poppins 13:59, 25 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Ahhh

You getting mentioned by name on a TOW discussion immediately nets you like 1,000,000 internets. NICE JOB! White•Mystery

[edit] Whoa There, Tiger

Your banhammer is heavy handed, indeed. I agree with most of your blocks, but it is a tool, not a toy.. generally other sysops hand out at least one first/final warning before unleashing the beatings (I like to use the

HEY FUCKTARD! ByAppointmentTo/Archive, you are being a stupid cunt! You need to stop whatever n00b is doing wrong. Keep it up and you gonna get raped.

template on their talk page, personally). Also, inifite bans are serious fucking business. Weev probably disagrees with me on this but I always thought the general convention was to use infinite blocks on gratitiuous and wanton vandals only. Just my $0.02 there, keep up the good work, new fellow sysop *wingsnugs*

</td>

(Talk) (Contribs) defiled this page on April 26, 2008 17:44

• Also, don't go deletion crazy. Your basic M.O. should be to forget about the old fail and concentrate on incoming fail. We've had much discussion about this over the last year and the consensus was that trying to 'fix' ED and purge everything that has little-to-no Internets is like trying to clean the pigeon shit from Trafalgar Square with a Q-Tip.

Well written stuff like Gorillaz can stand because it loosely fits with all our Anniemay and the band have traditionally been very active online. It is also better to rewrite or add Internets to older crappy or Internets light articles (like Scotland) than delete them.

Also, always check the edit histories of articles to see if the legends of ED (like GV, ghettofinger, weev, Hardvice, Quasidan etc) started or contributed them. Other articles, like Potty Pete are pet projects of certain Sysops or EDiots with tenure. Even if they have zero Internets, deleting another Sysop's work is bad form.

Apart from that, don't bug Weev with deletion stuff. Weev, by and large, doesn't care for deletion sprees and has better things to do (like keeping ED online). Feel free to bug me on old and new alike. TFO and Sheneequa (when she gets back) are also good for advice.

tl;dr? Don't delete stuff that predates your banhammer. If you want to propose deletions, make a list and run them by me and/or the admin list (when you get on it) for approval. --OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 14:09, 26 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Fbr trash

Good job protecting Fbr trash. Practically every edit that article receives is either vandalism or just unfunny bullshit. However, I think you may have left some of that recent string of vandalism intact. The article is ~27,000 kb right now, and before today's vandalism started, it was ~37,000 kb. I think this edit might be the last decent version. Also, there's a random section inserted at the bottom of the article; it says simply ==NO U==. It's been there for a while, but I didn't notice it until just now. Anyway, I just thought you should know.
Regards, Endedrural _(talk) 17:57, 26 April 2009 (CDT)

[edit] OldDirtyBtard is oooooooooold.

Well...that pic was from about a year ago and I think all the CO$ bullshit put about 10 years on me but, yeah, I can still pass for late 20s to mid 30s depending on the age of the girl I'm hitting on. Mind you, some chicks dig the Sean Connery older man thing (ie, wants to date daddy) so I rarely lie. I actually can't date anyone under 25 any moar since there's a slim chance I had a kid when I was 23 (long story).

As for your performance as a Sysop, no complaints here mate. You're doing a heckavu job Brownie. I just saw that you were looking sideways at Gorillaz and wanted to nip another deletion rampage in the bud. We just had one that got a bit nasty and WhiteMystery did a lot of pruning of [[Category:Music]] (after running it by the admin list) while I was gone.

I haven't really looked at your molestation log but since Hoverround gave you a protip (above) on that already, I'm sure everything is copasetic.

Truth be told, you're a bit of a lab rat. We usually send new Sysops a Sysops:101 'primer' of sorts I wrote for those who came after me (Oct 2006), but since you seem to know the ropes like a veteran (like unbanning yourself) we decided that we'd just let you go at it and learn on the job like in the old days. --OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 15:18, 26 April 2008 (CDT)

I was still getting free shit meant for 16 and under on giveaway days at Yankee Stadium at 26 and I still only have to shave once a week. Plus I don't exactly act like how a 47-year-old is supposed to act per 'societal norms'. I think there has to be a link to longevity in my lifestyle somewhere. It's like, I don't really have shit like a family, a mortgage, car payments or a career (HAHAHA) to worry about so I don't have to grow up (needs moar article). I'm also well preserved in alcohol.

As for the J.O.B....I usually avert potential fail by nubs thusly. Feel free to use as is or adapt:

• Your article was flushed before you put any more work in only to see it flushed at a later date. Whilst there's a lot of content on ED in the same vein, we're trying to get back to what we're supposed to be about...Internets related lulz and drama. Please read the above and do not attempt to recreate said article or or it's Banhammer time.

• • {{NOU}}

--OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 14:54, 22 May 2008 (CDT)

• Looks like you made a contribution and it got reverted or flushed. Read the above instruction manual and ED:101 for PROTIPS. And please refrain from recreating said faggotry or it's Banhammertime.

Also, if you see a page being made (or slept on) that has potential, you can move the {{crap}} {{stub}} to a {{userspace}} so they can get it up to par.

One of the reasons I like to 'talk' to potential EDitors rather than just delete/revert is cos I was treated like I was an idiot when I first got on and might have just moved right along if it wasn't for some encouragement by Yiri and Ket.

--OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 15:57, 26 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Lazy

Ditto...plus it's fucking awesome outside atm so ima lurk moar there and let my compy cool down. --OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 16:07, 26 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] TOW Drama

Go for it. I have a mole at TOW who's a great resource. Take a look at the drama surrounding CO$ fanboi User:Justanother aka JustaHulk. My pal has a lot of insider stuff on him. I'll hook you guys up.--OldDirtyBtard • WUT? 16:28, 26 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] My userpage

Someone (Grawp I'm assuming) added all my personal info to my userpage. It's currently protected by you from vandalism apparently. Could you please delete all that information from the history?--UR 21:33, 28 April 2008 (CDT)

• Lol, I didn’t do that, but I have it fucking saved to an MS Word document now. — Grawp 00:08, 29 April 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Rickroll

Hi, just thought I'd give you something to do with your new sysop powers. Could you please protect Rickroll? The reasoning for this is over a completely pointless edit war (as usual) involving the scaryroll video. That one asshole who always spams that youtube account freezer bullshit keeps changing the video to his version, which can be viewedhere. The other version, [1], is the oldest scaryroll on youtube and is apparently the original one, as it's made by the original user. If you look through the edit history of rickroll, you'll see that the last 20 or 30 edits have just been pointless faggotry. Protecting this article would also put a stop to all of the people who constantly try to add embedded videos of their shitty parodies. I think the article's pretty good in its present state and really doesn't need any more shitty edits messing it up. The user who keeps reverting to his version of the scaryroll seems to have a ton of accounts, so I wouldn't worry too much about banning him. He seems relatively harmless, except that he keeps spamming up RC with this pointless revert war. Right now, it seems to be on the correct version of the page. If yo