HELP ED WIN AN AWARD! Encyclopedia Dramatica is in contention for the 2nd Annual Mashable Open Web Awards for the wiki category. With your help, we can beat the Wikipedia menace! Plz vote for ED by going here; you can vote once per day, per email address, ballot stuffing encouraged! Just don't forget to confirm the vote via e-mail. VOTE OR DIE!!!

User talk:Iicatsii

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Jump to: navigation, search

OLD TALK PAGES

Contents

[edit] !

Your addition to my page was genius! -The Judge

[edit] thanks for rec

hope all is well

€ Zenophile ﮚ æ ◄ Ǽ Talk ► 10:36, 29 October 2007 (CDT)

[edit] argent

god he uses the same lines everytime lol

€ Zenophile ﮚ æ ◄ Ǽ Talk ► 16:52, 5 November 2007 (CST)

Image:Argenttocasey.jpg

argent left this on casey's youtube profile

€ Zenophile ﮚ æ ◄ Ǽ Talk ► 04:54, 6 November 2007 (CST)

[edit] SE

you wouldn't happen to have any info on channelreviews ? Weatherman 09:45, 17 November 2007 (CST)

i have various names actually. i'd say claudeclark282, claudeclark007 etc.Weatherman 09:50, 17 November 2007 (CST)

[edit] Hai Iicatsii

Ur Amy Whinehouse link is teh broken. Lawls plz give us back our Maddie 02:45, 12 February 2008 (CST)

  • Cheers, T'is fixed now. ~ CATS 03:48, 12 February 2008 (CST)

[edit] TDB

Yeah he is. I only just found out. Battim is not the kind to lie about this. They are setting up a College Fund for his Kid etc.

I don't know much more. I don't think he was ill or anything. I think it was sudden. Apparently Tom Serson made the obligatory objectionable comments in a video, but i didn't see - i only just found out a while ago.

So yeah i am 99% sure its true. One of the 1st "Haters" on youtube has died.

€ Zenophile ﮚ æ ◄ Ǽ Talk ► 11:47, 12 February 2008 (CST)

[edit] Please rape

Please rape JoeCapricorn. SuperMonkeyMan 01:57, 15 February 2008 (CST)

  • Your wish is my command. ~ CATS 02:00, 15 February 2008 (CST)

Thanks, he was blanking images. He was banned once already as Nespithe. SuperMonkeyMan 02:02, 15 February 2008 (CST)

He's back again as Esoteric666. SuperMonkeyMan 02:08, 15 February 2008 (CST)

Please rape Miasmatic. It's JoeCapricorn again. SuperMonkeyMan 02:38, 15 February 2008 (CST)

Need one on Chrisyusun 09. SuperMonkeyMan 02:40, 15 February 2008 (CST)

Thanks, sorry to have to bother you with all the requests. SuperMonkeyMan 02:43, 15 February 2008 (CST)

  • Don't worry about it, I'm more worried that my own personal vandal detector has gone tits up. ~ CATS 02:45, 15 February 2008 (CST)

[edit] <3

Sorry for spamming up Recent Changes. I'm attempting to remove the instances of dyk between slowdowns so we can unblank it and hopefully start using it sparingly again. <3 WhiteMystery

  • Don't worry about it. To be honest I hadn't noticed, I'm too busy fapping over Debra Lafave at the moment. ~ CATS 15:01, 20 February 2008 (CST)
  • Hey, I hadn't really thought of it until I re-read my mail this morning, but I wanted to apologize it if sounded like I was saying you did anything wrong in the message about the guy being auto-banned. I wanted to include the full block message to make it easier for ajt to figure it out, but in no way did I think you did anything wrong. The people being shown logging in from the server's address drives me nuts cause I've accidentally auto-blocked a few people myself. WhiteMystery

[edit] Unbanning EBWFGame1

  • I only unbanned him because he asked to be and I couldn't see an explanation as to why he was banned. So you can ban him if he starts forcing his meme again. --Entropy 08:45, 4 March 2008 (CST)

[edit] Hai Iicatsii

I'm working on the 3m article and would appreciate any feedback you have time to give.Caltrops 22:28, 11 March 2008 (CDT)

  • Sure. To be honest before I read your article I just though 3M was another in a long line of boring vloggers who manufacture drama to get them away from their tedium of being. However afterwards I looked into the whole 3M background and all I can say is What A Rotter! Being that most of his dodgy dealings at the end of the 90's were on newsgroups, that's the area that should be looked in. ~ CATS 03:24, 12 March 2008 (CDT)

Sorry to be catching your advice almost 2 months late and thank you.My thick headed friend EDSlave has vowed to never do something like that again and would like the opportunity to help condense and revamp the article...is it possible for them to be unbanned?.We've noticed the TL;DR and we're going to get going on it before the end of the weekend.Thanks againCaltrops 15:31, 10 May 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Cloned Users

Just for clarification, is this you guys fucking around or someone else fucking around? - Jasper Jasper @ MeowMail.com 17:50, 17 March 2008 (CDT)

  • Sysops fuck around? Cloned accounts get banned on sight; If you see any on RC patrol, let a friendly sysop know and they'll deal with it. ~ Shalashaska 18:00, 17 March 2008 (CDT)

[edit] CWC

Not to worry - I got tired of seeing his name pop up in Recent Changes yesterday, but I agree he has great potential. I'll urge him to get on IRC if he starts up again today. WhiteMystery

  • Fucker is back and blanking the article again. Is there any chance of this being resolved soon? WhiteMystery


[edit] Plato

First, congratulations and awards are in order for lolz:

GG HEY THERE!
Hey, Iicatsii! I saw what you did with User_Talk:Jquandar
I just wanted to say keep up the good work

Secondly, someone is hurting over their article and has created about 3 socks to vandalize it. Some help/raep-dust would be appreciated:

User Egeste was raeped before I came to ED, user simonzer0 was raeped after vadalizing the article, but user etsege is still floating around. This guy is obsessed with getting raeped. I say give it to him. A checkuser would probably verify they're all socks of the same person. Also, please note that they are only here to discuss that one article. This person 'Stephen *alentine, and we dont mean 'Valentine' is a troll of epic proportions, famous for his many alias' and social engineering in his efforts troll entire communities. We talked to his ex girlfriend last week who told us his real name-- that's what has sparked his many new socks. Please ban accordingly. If you decide to discuss the issue, be prepared to be shown lots of altered IRC logs and USeNET articles that he intentionally setup just so he could use this troll tactic. Watch out, he's extremely manipulative. What a faggot. Plato 12:45, 22 March 2008 (CDT)

  • It seems like the etsege sock for gammamute/simonzer0 is just here for social engineering purposes and not to vandalize the actual article about him (yet; he might get desperate for cock again), maybe he could be convinced to work on other articles instead causing [LOL Drama]
    • if not, maybe raep is in order (yet the lolz he is bringing is consistently being added to the article, im just concerned about him bugging you guys :he got on irc and posted some ancient, engineered logs to whitemystery I guess saying that I AM the person I am writing my own pet article about? <--- lolwut?)
    • this is not the first time he's done this, and was b& for it last time
    • also not the first time we've seen this kind of behaviour from him
    • he's claiming that he is not simonzer0 <--- lolwut?
    • simonzer0's only edit was vandalizing the article about him, yet he is not a sock? <--- lolwut?

The faggotry is strong with this one. At least he's not using proxies, yet. We're actually writing the article because he pissed me off for 2 years by using a proxy in my area to impersonate me on usenet. I can't wait to see what he does next. Stand by for lolz. Plato 14:53, 22 March 2008 (CDT)


[edit] Hai again

I've posted a draft of a new article on my user page.Any criticism or advice would be appreciatedCaltrops 03:02, 11 May 2008 (EDT)

[edit] Image:Wikipedia admins.jpg

Hi. I need to know where Wikipedia_admins.jpg is originally from. Where did you find it? Thanks in advance. --Ohu 00:42, 26 August 2008 (CDT)

  • I can't remember, sorry. ~ Shalashaska 16:08, 30 August 2008 (CDT)
    • Scratch that, I found it on a dead website called Bad Gas Dirt Dog 03:20, 30 September 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Material

Hi.

Obviously Alison is a pain. I think that her latest string of drama warrants her own personal article, no? I tried simply moving the bit about her (which in itself is long enough for an article) from Bureaucratic Fuck to Alison but of course she reverted it.

The Encyc article, and indeed the site in itself, became filled with drama. The screen shot maybe helps, but I think that the bit about "because Blissyu2 wrote about Poetlister beforehand" is a bit confusing.

Alison making banners stating that her sole reason for being on Encyc was to terrorise me, whilst at the same time claiming that she was actually protecting others from me, I think needs to be mentioned somewhere, especially in light of her past behaviour. Basically, a perennial liar.

I only meant to put in some details and then have some of you fine folks put it into a readable form. I am not good at writing articles. I am only good with ideas. Sadly, of course, Alison likes to TL;DR everything to muddy the waters, which is what she did here, of course. Any reason why User:Alliecat isn't listed as a sock puppet of User:Alison? Blissyu2 06:03, 27 September 2008 (CDT)

  • The Encyc page covers the drama well enough as you're both as bad as each other; if there's any drama outside of Encyc then yes, Alison would warrant a page of her own. Put together an evidence page in your space and I'll see if I can work with it. Also - stop kissing ass, it's not very becoming. CATS 06:14, 27 September 2008 (CDT)
  • (ec) Now, now, Captain Butthurt, look what happened last time you tried that stunt. Oh, and speaking of "perennial liars" an' all ... :) - Alliecat 06:19, 27 September 2008 (CDT)
  • Keep away from stalkers Blissyu2 07:03, 27 September 2008 (CDT)
    • Blissy was BAWWWWWing to me about this being removed. Do with it what you want; I don't give a shit. --Blu Aardvark 20:59, 27 September 2008 (CDT)
      • No worries. When I clicked on it before I reverted his removal of Alliecat's and my own comments, the link didn't seem to work. Dirt Dog 03:52, 28 September 2008 (CDT)
        • The link doesn't work? Okay. Try it with "Doc" in it. It works for me, but there is something about publishing. Try now: [1] Blissyu2 07:41, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
          • I think it was just Google being ropey, it was OK after Blu re-added it to my talk page. Dirt Dog 07:47, 29 September 2008 (CDT)

[edit] oops

As I explained to Blu Aardvark (who was obviously drunk and not listening) I had meant to simply insert the link that had info about Alison, like you asked me to, but I started off writing a hugely long explanation, then realised it was TL;DR and so I wiped it, replacing it just with that link, which I thought was enough for you to figure it out. I didn't realise I had wiped anything of yours, and just thought I had wiped my own really long things. I don't know if you care about reading the whole thing or not. Basically, what I was saying is that Alison has totally destroyed Encyc. This makes her worthy of entry. If you think that she should be praised for this act of incredible trolling, lying her head off, stalking, complete and utter hypocrisy by simultaneously smearing my name whilst claiming that in doing so she was stopping me from smearing others, and a whole huge range of lying, then that is up to you. If alternatively you want to slam her for it, that is also up to you. But I for one have never seen such advanced levels of trolling. It sure beats Blu Aardvark's weak-assed multiple accounts on Wikipedia. Alison's trolling pissed me off hugely, leading to me swearing at her, which she of course used against me, because that was what she was going for. She even posted her own user page saying that she was there to troll (or words to that effect), then, in spite of confessing to it, she then got really angry about it. Alison could write a book about trolling, stalking and running smear campaigns. Remember the Julie Wilkinson/Julie Kelly/Kevin Furlong person? The one that stalked me back in 2002? Same person who ended up getting prosecuted by the CIA for running that big smear on Captain AmErika (and, coincidentally, General Michael Hayden, the current head of the CIA - although at that stage he was just a general)? She was big in LJ Drama back in the day, destroyed LJ Review, and did all of that. Well, quite frankly, Alison is superior to her. I know that you aren't allowed to write about Juliegrrl for legal reasons, but you sure can write about Alison. Seriously, I have never seen anyone as bad. And she has the whole of Wikipedia Review believing her lies too. I am sure that her name is invented, and she is probably a guy too, but hey, that's just a guess because Julie was. And of course because Poetlister is. And of course because practically anyone who plays damsel in distress is. But hey, what am I saying? There are real girls about. If she is really a girl, she will not even say that being a girl matters. If she is a guy she will say "Hey wait! I am a girl! Don't you know I am a girl?" A bit like the not racist rule. I still hate ED, but some of the memes are funny, at least where they are done not at anyone's expense. Gosh, can you remember Julie making that huge fuss, claiming so much that I was stalking her, while she was ringing up my employers and telling them I was a paedophile? Remember all of that? All the while saying I was a stalker because I told someone her name was Julie Kelly, when in actual fact that was a made up name? Gosh, what fun. That sure was fun. Yes, well, anyway, there is ample material for an Alison article, just looking at the shit she did on Encyc. I haven't waded through her stuff on WR but it is undoubtedly just as bad. A true troll leader. She could probably run a smear campaign against the head of the CIA too. It's like the troll equivalent of hacking into NASA. I think that Alison is capable of that. See who she can troll to compete with Julie/Kevin's feats. She has that potential. Blissyu2 05:58, 29 September 2008 (CDT)

  • Everyone knows that there's no girls on the internet. Dirt Dog 07:06, 29 September 2008 (CDT)

Executive summary: I wrote TL;DR, tried to wipe it and my mouse slipped to wipe off mine + everyone else's. Alison is a supreme troll and destroyed Encyc. She is also a supreme liar, stalker, hypocrite, and probably a man pretending to be a woman and those photos she uses probably belong to some poor innocent woman who, a la Grace Note, Poetlister and of course "Juliegrrl". I see potential in the young padawan, however, and I truly believe she can reach the heights of Juliegrrl, the queen of LJ Drama throughout 2003, until Julie ended up prosecuted by the CIA for running a smear campaign against General Michael Hayden, who in May 2006 was made head of the CIA (and still is the head today). You can read more about that scandal by doing a Google search for "Captain AmErika". See my name, Juliegrrl, Kevin Furlong (the fake name HE used while stalking the head of the CIA), LJ Drama (who fell for it hook, line and sinker) and of course General Michael Hayden. Here, have a look [2]. Alison warrants her own page because of the sheer severity of her lies, that means that she could potentially also stalk the head of the CIA (or an equivalent, since that has already been done now). I should wear a badge "I got stalked by the same guy who stalked the head of the CIA". Of course, the same as the Port Arthur massacre thing, so many people don't believe me :(. How sad. I would have thought I was proven right by now, but apparently it is not shocking enough to be believable. Also: Alison is a master of the use of the TL;DR to hide truth.

Gah, I suck at executive summaries. Blissyu2 07:29, 29 September 2008 (CDT)

  • I know this sounds weird from someone from ED* , but can't you and Alison work together? If you look between the reverts, flames and insults on Encyc, the two of you want the same thing. (*I've been playing a lot of BURNOUT PARADISE lately, it's a very mellowing game.) As for the LJ Drama stuff, that's long before my time. Dirt Dog 07:38, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
    • We want the same thing? How is that? She wants to smear my name whilst systematically claiming she is stopping me from smearing her name. I want her to stop her shit and leave me the fuck alone. By the way, check out this pro-Julie blog [3]. Gosh people are gullible, aren't they? Post a crazy enough story and people will be so sure that it is true, based on how simply unbelievable it is that they will buy it. Blissyu2 07:45, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
    • Yes, I have decided to just not worry about it. She has smeared my name, but so far it hasn't entered my real life. She doesn't know me personally, so her primary motivation for doing this is e-fame - attention seeking. Julie might have stalked Michael Hayden for some big reason, but she stalked me for e-fame. I know that I am small time, and if, as she claims, she isn't doing it to support Somey then she will give up and forget about it. I have other things to do anyway. I am writing my own RPG at the moment, for a laugh, and trying to finish playing HOMM 5 and Spellforce, plus of course there is work, plus my 3 side jobs, and all of the rest. I hate it that you end up getting stuck doing things that you hate. But Encyc was a nice little home for me for 6 or 7 months, before Alison destroyed it. It was my little place to go to relax and unwind. Well, what can you do? Its gone now. Blissyu2 07:49, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
      • You wrote this [4] to counter this [5], correct? If something was to happen to this [6], then they'd be no need for [7]. As for Alison trolling you, Welcome To The INTERNETS, Only People With Thick Skins Are Admitted! Seriously, if someone can troll you to the point that you have to leave a website, then it's going happen to you on every website you make a home for yourself. Dirt Dog 07:57, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
        • Partially. Actually I thought that there should be some mention of the Giselle Hillman internet alias, just as an informative thing, since it wasn't a real name. The same as how if I was doing juliegrrl, I would do one on both Kevin Furlong and Julie Wilkinson, because they were 2 fake real names that they used (pretended to be real names but actually weren't). The bit about how what was said about them was wrong was an important part to add, given that Proabviouc's report was blaming the whole thing on me. I mean, getting referred by and written by mixed up is pretty stupid, and then writing a whole thing, putting in my real name, and stating that I had definitely set up the whole thing based on that is pretty freaking dumb. The thing is that Proabviouc wasn't trying to troll me. That was an official thing on Wikipedia. Same thing with juliegrrl, there most certainly are Julie Wilkinsons and Julie Kellys about (although I checked pretty thoroughly and there is no such person in the world as Kevin Furlong). But that doesn't mean that if you find one that it is actually them. I thought that people should note that. And really, I thought that, given that Emperor had gone to that much effort setting up Encyc (the PmWiki) as a secure site, that he would go to some effort to stop trolls on his MediaWiki site. Its not like its hard or anything. He even did get rid of them - all bar Alison. Apparently her being a Wikipedia administrator makes her immune, because he wants to see her dig a hole for herself. But when she is making stuff up and using my real name, like she was doing, that's a fair bit worse than just making stuff up about Blissyu2. As I told her, she can feel free to write whatever shit she likes in the Blissyu2 article on ED. I note that she hasn't touched it. Why not add her shit from Encyc onto ED, but then leave the defamatory shit off Encyc? People read ED and know that it probably isn't true, so it can't really hurt you. People read Encyc, and they might think that it is reliable? I dunno. I don't generally go to places where people can troll. Blissyu2 10:27, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
          • You guys over at Wikipedia Review used to have a saying, that Wikipedia is the worlds biggest MMORPG. I find the whole internet is one HUEG MMORPG, and that people might have been better off sticking to Super Famicom. Dirt Dog 13:23, 29 September 2008 (CDT)
            • My meme was that Wikipedia was like a group blog. I called it "Encycloblog". Every so often people would catch on with that, but then people would stop. I don't really think it is like an MMORPG at all - that is more of an ED thing. There are gaming elements, of course, but it has more serious elements. Essentially I see 2 major issues: WP:OWN and WP:NPOV. These 2 rules both have to go if Wikipedia is to have a chance of being a decent reference source. Articles need to be owned - and by people who should know what they are talking about (i.e. experts in the field). NPOV needs to be ignored in favour of writing factual, informed, articles by people who knows that they are saying. NPOV leads to idiocy, but it also leads to false statements. As a reference source, these are the two main problems with it. As a social experiment, it is horrible primarily because of the software (which is also on ED) that encourages stalking. ED is actually a lot better, because admins have check user, can just wipe things without discussions, they don't have public requests for arbitration, and don't smear someone's name whenever they ban someone (well, they do, but they do it to people who aren't banned too so it evens out). There are few more hostile environments to go to than Wikipedia. Just to survive, you need to game the system. If they fixed up the software, WP:OWN and WP:NPOV, then the place would be an awful lot better. Unfortunately, the guy who started it wasn't a big picture person and couldn't see the problems that his unenforceable rules would lead to, which is what went wrong. Some people do say that the world is a game though, and perhaps in some ways it is. But in a game, you really hate people that cheat. Unless of course you too know the cheat codes. But if you all know the cheat codes then it ends up like playing Diablo I online - i.e. totally retarded and anyone over 6 years of age gets sick of it. Blissyu2 01:36, 30 September 2008 (CDT)
So I'm just playing catch-up here, and the above is totally awesome. I'm impressed :) Anyways - where were we? Oh yes, using Blissyu2's RL name; sorry, never have. I'm sure you're not interested particularly, but that fucktard above decided to create an article about me on Blissypedia. I got tipped off two weeks later, made some changes, Captain Blisspot went ballistic and much drahmaz ensued. Blissy then took his toyz, came over here and wrote a supremely unlulzy, fail of an article on me. So here we are :) Fun and games for all the family. I've kinda given up trying to refute the guy at this stage so am just here for fun, really. I'm a crazy evil bitch and "probably a guy too" (with really bad manboobs) but what can ya do ... - Alliecat 02:25, 30 September 2008 (CDT)
And lol - I guess his plan worked ^__^ - Alliecat 02:29, 30 September 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Gah I made it worse

Can you fix it?

Sorry, I really suck at writing articles. Blissyu2 10:56, 29 September 2008 (CDT)

[edit] "Referred by" vs "Written by"

Proabviouc, unfortunately, is someone I cannot contact. He is only available on Wikipedia and WR. I obviously can't use either places. I wrote on the Wiki-EN mailing list about it, and they refused to publish it. I wrote on the register article, and they refused to publish it. I wrote on Encyc to ask to pass the message on, and Alison TL;DR'd my message, wiped it, and then tried to claim I was smearing this non existent person's name by trying to get Proabviouc to correct his article. I have tried as much as I could to contact Proabviouc, but either he is being told a whole huge range of lies by Alison, or else he is just not willing to look at it. Hence I have my Google docs, which I hope that people can read. I did have the same thing, essentially, in the Encyc article, which I stand by as being legitimate, but since Alison went retarded with revert wars and stupid statements, and Emperor wouldn't step in, I put it in somewhere that I can control. It is pretty obvious that it wasn't related to a real person, if such a person existed, because of the disclaimer in big bold letters. But then again, if people think that I really did create the Poetlister identity, based on Proabviouc showing me inviting Poetlister to join classmates.com, as they have, then perhaps people will believe anything. Being accused of creating the Poetlister identity itself isn't really a big deal, as far as my real life is concerned, but it attaches itself to a whole big range of other more serious things, and makes them sound plausible. His use of my real name attached to my internet identity is a big problem, and if anything that is the most serious element. But what can I do? It's been weeks now and plenty of people have seen it, but nobody has seen fit to talk to him about it. Blissyu2 01:27, 30 September 2008 (CDT)

Indeed, the biggest problem I would have with that DOC is you pseudonym being bound with your real life information. Anyway, This is the way I see things through the bullets of the flame war , it may help you, it may not. Both you and Alison have had problems with things on the internet spilling over into you real life so both of you protect your online identities. Both of you would rather NOT have page about yourselves over at the shit fest known as Encyc because both pages are open to abuse. Now Alison has a problem with your page on one of Poetlister’s aliases and you have a problem with your real life details being on a Google doc written by someone on your old website and because you cannot get in contact with the people responsible, you obviously need a third party with some clout to put your point across to the people responsible… Do you see where I’m going with this?
Now both you and Alison agree to having both your pages wiped, with a promise that neither of you will touch them again in the foreseeable future. Both apologise for the things said over the past week and both agree to let it be water under the bridge. From what I can tell, neither of you reside on the same continent let alone the same town so it’s not as if you’re going to run into each other IRL, life’s too short to get pissed at someone online. You get Encyc back and maybe, just maybe Alison help you out with your real life info problem… Lets build bridges here people!
Failing that you could just flag the shit out of the Google doc as it constitutes as abuse. Dirt Dog 02:37, 30 September 2008 (CDT)
Sounds like a plan to me. I've just blanked all the offending pages on encyc (including my own) and asked Emperor to baleet them for the abominations that they are. Also, I spoke with Proabivouac on the phone the other day and he tells me that Blissyu2 has never tried to contact him since the Poetlister report was written. Last I checked, you could email Proab by clicking on this - Alliecat 02:44, 30 September 2008 (CDT)
Let me take it one step further so. Blissyu2 - I sincerely apologize for all the drama and nonsense that broke out over the last week or so, and I mean that. Escalating to nuclear war doesn't work in anyone's favour, so let's both quit this now, as both of us have been severely damage by RL issues that come from teh internets. You'd think we'd have more empathy for each other. So ... ummm ... sorry - Alliecat 02:50, 30 September 2008 (CDT)
Oh, and I'm also in contact with Proab and can maybe get your stuff fixed. I also have some contacts at The Google - Alliecat 02:54, 30 September 2008 (CDT)
  • I think this is called for:
  • I'm half expecting a lynch mob to come after me, being that defusing a situation is against the Dramacrat code. Dirt Dog 04:32, 30 September 2008 (CDT)

[edit] Banhammer, plz

User:Alison - this is my old account. I just logged into the wrong account on my phone to revert a pageblanker & I don't want to be accused of any funny biz, y'know? - Alliecat 05:34, 30 September 2008 (CDT)

  • Your wish is my command. Dirt Dog 05:49, 30 September 2008 (CDT)
    • Tks ;) - Alliecat 11:13, 30 September 2008 (CDT)
Personal tools

Bookmark and Share