Our pal Rick Astley is up for the MTV Europe award for BEST ACT EVAR! You can help by voting here, digging this and signing this petition.

User talk:Nathanr

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Jump to: navigation, search

Hello, Nathanr

THIS IS SERIOUS; READ IT.

Congratulations on joining ED! You probably fit into one of these categories:

1. New User
Before making your first article look over ED:101. Try checking out random articles and fixing typos, grammar and/or bullshit where you find them before trying to make a new page. To start with, make multiple small edits to different articles until you have the hang of it. If you don't, it is unlikely that your article will survive for more than sixty seconds and you risk being molested by ED Sysops.
If you don't know anything about wiki formatting and code, please read ED:BASIC and the Style Guide. Take your time and start slowly.


2. Mediawiki Migrant If you're an experienced wiki user (probably from a Wikipedia offshoot) who knows how to operate, please read ED:101 for offical policy and ED:MIGRANT for tips on assimilation and basic rules.


Whichever you are, to successfully contribute to ED, please take some time to look around, note why other people get banned and don't act like they did.


Communication with other users prevents misunderstandings and can be done through talk pages, TJC and the mailing list.

If you plan on sticking around, feel free to make your mark on the ED:Map and join the ED Facebook, the ED Myspace and the ED Bebo.


Thanks for the welcome - Nathanr 04:30, 20 Feb 2006 (UTC)

Please don't move or remove this welcome message. Some poor luser will think you haven't been welcomed and will post it again. Then you'll remove it again and someone else will post it. And so on and so on. Anyway, you obviously haven't paid sufficient attention to it. Just looking around for a while, you'll see that blanking pages or removing comments from a talk page is considered very poor etiquette here. I'd only make an archive if the talk page has become very long and the material several months old. Even then, it's common courtesy to leave a link to the archive. --Jacknstock 04:26, 23 Feb 2006 (UTC)

Did you read the welcome message? You seem to have missed this bit:

Don't make an idiot of yourself! Seeing as you are new around here, we don't appreciate a case of severe unwarranted self-importance.

You don't make the rules around here. This is a Sherrodcracy. Read Encyclopedia_Dramatica:ED_Is_Not for more information. If you are set on establishing your own petty fiefdom here, I suggest you buy a decent-sized pixel ad. Within the area of your pixel ad, you can do whatever you want. You certainly can't tell admins what to say. --Jacknstock 10:45, 25 Feb 2006 (UTC)

Well, you can tell admins what to say, but we won't pay any attention. --Jacknstock 10:48, 25 Feb 2006 (UTC)

I just found your reply to my previous advice. Very amusing:

Yes, I have paid sufficient attention to it. What haven't I paid attention to? There's nothing on the welcome message that says LEAVE THIS ON YOUR TALK PAGE PLZ KTHNX. That would be why I archived it to its own page, so that I could save a reference to it while NOT cluttering up my talk page. I'll take the advice of leaving it up, but I disagree with my 'not paying sufficient attention to it'. I know how to use Wikis, thanks very much - I've been using them for quite a while now. Have I edited any articles much less blanked any info in any article? No (and if I did, I'd have a damn good reason, I do know Wiki-etiquette). I only removed the welcome message from my page. Sorry to disappoint you, but I'm really not an idiot. I suggest against making any such assumptions. Nothing I've done has proven that I don't know how to use Wikis or that I haven't paid attention to the welcome message. - Nathanr 10:00, 25 Feb 2006 (UTC)

I don't think you are an idiot, but I do think you are tending towards a little arrogance and do not yet have a great understanding of this wiki and its community. You might know the etiquette at some other wiki, but you don't know the etiquette here. Nor will you ever learn if you merely contradict it and delete the helpful information provided by those of us who have been here for some time.

I also noticed that you are leaving little messages in the summary field. My first response to you was not "overly PERSONAL ATTACKING in tone." I said "please" and provided an explanation, and I didn't saying anything personal about you at all. I clearly explained why we'd prefer that you leave the welcome message here, and that is all I did. Any "tone" was read into it by you. I understand that you are new here and probably not aware that we have a custom of leaving comments in talk pages. We treat this like a thread in a polite discussion board or a instant messaging conversation or even a verbal conversation. You can reply, but you can't unsay what someone else has said. The only exception would be pure vandalism or spam... or, of course, huge, verbose and completely unenforcable regulation notices posted by some n00b who doesn't realize this is a Sherrodcracy.

All I'm trying to do is inform you of the way things work around here, and the peculiar etiquette that has been established over time. My intention is not to attack you personally. I want you to be accepted around here, establishing yourself as a useful and valued contributor. To that end, I suggest you step away from this talk page and your user page, and that you move towards chronicling some of the plentiful lulz and drama that is available on the Internets. --Jacknstock 11:17, 25 Feb 2006 (UTC)

Read Jacknstock's statement again: we don't appreciate a case of severe unwarranted self-importance. You have not contributed anything to this site except for petty squabbles on your user page. If this continues, you will be banned (again). --TheEvilBlueberryCouncil 21:05, 25 Feb 2006 (UTC)

With respect, your friendly neighbourhood admin, Bastardman 21:48, 25 Feb 2006 (UTC)

Lawl, what a cocksmoker, welcome to ED. You learnt him good Jacknstock lawl. LAWL.--WKD 21:32, 25 Feb 2006 (UTC)

What? Wrong page and he's back? Dear oh dear.

  1. Listen to Jacks advice, he is only trying to help and that's the most advice he has given ANYONE EVAR.
  2. ED brooks no faggots. Your Unwarranted self-importance is making you a faggot. Stop. Your rules don't mean shit. We will ignore them and if you get into edit wars, YOU are the one who will be banned.
  3. Fucks sake listen to what people tell you. People are really trying to help but you will get banned again if you keep this up. Don't delude yourself by think other admins are differant to Jack; mostly they're worse.
  4. Don't delete comments from your talk page. It's not actually your talk page. This place works kinda different
  5. Killhamster is an admin also, and stop trying to tell them what to do.
  6. Welcome to ED, again.--WKD 21:43, 25 Feb 2006 (UTC)
  • He probably doesn't consider "faggot" as an epithet. You're shooting up the wrong tree there, WKD. --Jacknstock 16:21, 26 Feb 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Oh God

Hay, did you guys know Wikipedia actually has a template for:

The user would prefer the username nathanr. The initial letter is capitalized due to technical restrictions.

Srsly. And to think Jacknstock was complaining about the number of excess template we've got. --Bastardman 22:02, 25 Feb 2006 (UTC)

Someone add this to the page:--WKD 03:51, 26 Feb 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Even better

Post this, from a rant on TOW about how LJDrama totally misreported the story of how he hit his girlfriend:

Link until upload is fixed source


WHY DON'T THEY UNDERSTAND THAT I AM A VICTIM OF HITTING MY GIRLFRIEND?! --Ntg85 07:52, 26 Feb 2006 (UTC)

  • Why are you all being so mean to this guy? He's new here, he didn't understand our peculiar, poorly documented and completely arbitrary rules, but I think he's trainable. He has also been a wonderful source of drama and may have the valuable inside scoop. For example, he might explain why he had girlfriends when he's a totally "out" gay man. Give the guy a break. Let him tell his story. --Jacknstock 16:02, 26 Feb 2006 (UTC)
    • You're kidding, right? This guy is obviously a wannabe Bureaucratic Fuck from TOW who has a history with LJDrama, who came here and started bossing US around, disobeyed several admins, and complained because people were "being mean to him." That french tard is a great source of lulz too; why don't you unban him so we can throw him a tea party? --Ntg85 00:52, 27 Feb 2006 (UTC)


Nathan isn't gay, he's a bisexual man who has "feelings" for fifteen year old girls. TELL THE WIKITRUTH. The Airport Vandal 05:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

  • At the time he joined ED he was a “recently outed gay man”, so it was the WIKITRUTH at the time. ~ CATS 07:55, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • He's psychological fuck up who can only relate to women if they have dramatically less power than he does. The proper word for these guys is RAPIST.--WKD 02:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] LOL

Did it really take you three edits to leave one comment on my talk page? Tfo 22:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

  • That's the average wikipedo for you! ~ CATS 23:00, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
  • He's getting distracted by all the kiddy porn in the other windows.--WKD 01:00, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A support messageboard for you

Seriously, they will give you support and maybe help you win the girl back.

http://img.4chan.org/b/imgboard.html

Samsara 01:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Slander/Libel

Slander/defamation is against both Canadian and American (and pretty much any country) law.

SLANDER IS SPOKEN LIBEL IS WRITTEN YOU DUMB CANUCK
SLANDER IS SPOKEN LIBEL IS WRITTEN YOU DUMB CANUCK
SLANDER IS SPOKEN LIBEL IS WRITTEN YOU DUMB CANUCK
SLANDER IS SPOKEN LIBEL IS WRITTEN YOU DUMB CANUCK
SLANDER IS SPOKEN LIBEL IS WRITTEN YOU DUMB CANUCK
SLANDER IS SPOKEN LIBEL IS WRITTEN YOU DUMB CANUCK
SLANDER IS SPOKEN LIBEL IS WRITTEN YOU DUMB CANUCK
  • You are SO my favorite person. Tfo 22:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

--GayStation2 01:42, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

DreamHost Does Not Obey The Law
DreamHost Does Not Obey The Law
DreamHost Does Not Obey The Law
DreamHost Does Not Obey The Law
DreamHost Does Not Obey The Law
DreamHost Does Not Obey The Law
DreamHost Does Not Obey The Law
, mmmkay--Quit your whining or I'll use these 01:51, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!
ED IS SATIRE!!!!!

Miltopia 22:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE
SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A FUCKYOU TEMPLATE, BLINKIES WILL SUFFICE

-Ket Refill/lol 22:16, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Personal tools