User talk:PaigeGirl

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

People now want to do me on the internets! - imaybeparanoid

The price of e-fame? I bet the identity of that anon commenter is KILLING you lol paigegirl

You are mean.

--

I just read that post about marx_thug and this line richeer:
"Should'nt you be worshipping my strap-on or something?"
Yeah, um... I'd like to nominate you for God for writing that line.
four tildez and a ParkingStones 21:02, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Banned

Someone might unblock you one day. It won't be me. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 04:16, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Four hours. OK, that's a reasonable penalty. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 05:35, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Protected

I'm just trying to protect you from yourself. It will be interesting to see how long this lasts. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 04:37, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for sending the e-mail screencap. It doesn't do much to support your version of events, but I've added it to your bio anyway. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 05:14, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

• That has to be one of the funniest things I've seen in awhile. The desperation is tangible. Fire trucks

[edit] The whining campaign

Wow. I thought the All-Star Whiners award thing was just a joke. Your oh-so-valuable comment is back. Someone else has already commented above on how funny your "please don't defriend me" e-mail is, so I think it should stay. I can't see anywhere that you are claimed to be Thewatcher, there's just a link along with Synthetikmisery, Fanfic lesbians, Attention whores, Rant_about_cons, l555l, Doc_neuro, Will63. Do you think you are being accused of being all those other people as well? It looks to me like it's just a list of people/things that you are associated with in one way or another. BTW, I don't think Girlvinyl will appreciate this conversation being on her User talk page. If you want to talk to me, use my talk page. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 01:56, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

• I replied to your commnets in my journal and said all that I need to. There is no need to tell lies about me when there is so mush to parody. Now take out the blatant lies on my article which were an attack on me for what someone else edited into ratherberuckings article. paigegirl
  • Please list the lies and provide your version in point form for consideration. Obviously the email screencap is genuine - how else could it exist? It's also funny and would need to be replaced by something truly hilarious or I'd be accused by someone of deleting the lulz. The Thewatcher link seems reasonable as it's clear that s/he is one of your pals (come on, admit and tell us who it is). --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 02:19, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
  • You are determined to be a tool and stay a tool. I'll message or email Girlvinyl tomorrow after work and let her decide because I detest liars and you are certainly one. I'll submit my evidence to her. I will not appeal to someone with an obvious grudge. I am unable to even make a small edit here without being banned or whatever I touch being protected but you allow Emily to rampage all over and write her own damn ticket, I expect and have been given no fair treatment from you. Bite me. paigegirl
    • I'd like to mention that pretty much everyone has had a trample over ratherberucking - not just Emily - and that when Emily has edited it, it has invariably been trampled over within hours once more by whoever it is that is so determined to air their retardfest here. Why can't you just let go of things? --無 02:40, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
      • I have not touched her article! I ahve done NOTHING! Someone else made edits to her article, Aussieintm just decided it was me, all he fucking had to do was check the IP logs to see that it was not me like I asked. INSTEAD to get back at whothehellever is TheWatcher he went strait over and edited a bunch of fucking lies into my article and I want them out. He started this shit with me to get back at what some one else did. I hate liars and he's a damn liar. I want that lying shit removed. paigegirl
        • Nobody said you touched Ratherberucking's article. You are being very defensive. As I requested earlier, please list the lies and provide your version in point form for consideration. You use e-mail screencaps yourself, so you can't say they're unacceptable. It's also funny and would need to be replaced by something truly hilarious or I'd be accused by someone of deleting the lulz. The Thewatcher link seems reasonable as it's clear that s/he is one of your pals (come on, tell us who it is). --Scarletto the sock puppet
          • Quit distorting liar. TheWatcher made edits. You added added bogus shit to my article on your assumption which was wrong. I edited thewatcher out of my article stating it was not me and asking you to check the fucking IP logs, out of spite you protected the article and stated addding more FUCKING LIES. You decided it was me becuase I was on the scene, I read here a lot just like a lot of damn people so it's no surprtize that I would freaking be here. Instead of admitting you made a mistake you are lying nad distorting because you are a TOOL. So stfu. paigegirl
            • Please don't call people liars. If you think there should be corrections, please be more specific and provide the truth so that the misinformation can be corrected. Nobody is saying that Thewatcher is you. Are you completely disclaiming Thewatcher? Have you defriended Thewatcher on LJ? Perhaps if you will tell us who Thewatcher is and/or show evidence that you don't know this person and never communicate with this person, it would be reasonable to remove the link from your article. Or do you want me to remove the links of all people who aren't you? How come you haven't commented on my adding Will63? --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 03:23, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
            • Here is what I'm doing for now, until we get this whole thing cleared up. I've moved the article back to PaigeGirl so that your User page is unprotected and free for you to write your own bio. It can say anything you want about yourself and your various friendships/communties/drama/sex life/whatever. I only ask that you cease being rude to sysops. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 03:32, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
              • I only want you to stop blaming things on me and attacking me for what other people do. Also, please quit that tl;dr stuff. Try to actrually figure out what the hell is going instead of just throwing whatever down on the page, truth is always more funny/damaging than what's made-up. It's not unprotected and I really do not believe any attempt to square up your false assertions would be allowed anyways. You've gone out of your way to ban, protect and generally make sure that I cannot touch anything here. At this time I can't think of any funny way to make it fair anyways. Stop with the hate on you have for me, I never did anything to you, that's all I ask. Hace a good day. paigegirl
        • I care not about your fued with Aussie - I was correcting your assertion that he has been showing favouritism toward Emily. God, you're so histrionic --無 03:51, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
          • the hell he has'nt been showing favortism. Not because he even knows or likes or dislikes her, but only because he dislikes me. paigegirl
            • What I don't like is that you don't even try to reach a compromise or negotiate in any way. I've put the link in the PaigeGirl article to where you tell your version of the Ratherberucking story. I think it is appropriate. Does that make sense to you? --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 13:31, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
              • The link to that entry was never my issue, not really. I never added it in the first place and it staying or going is on you. The article got protected so fast there was never a chance for compromise on my part nor was it offered. I could not compromise on the issue of thewatcher, cause for real I have no idea who he or she even is. If I were going to edit this I'd really rather see it just levelled out some between she and I. Below is written in a somewhat amusing thing said to me (of course, I'm easily amused so sue me), grammarically probably needs work to fit though. The screenshot, against my will is starting to grow on me... must be trhe line about the spiders I think, cause I hate them so much.

Since being defriended by Ratherberucking, PaigeGirl has become even more bat shit insane, however friends of Paige assert that they'd sooner be friended to the admitted nutjob than the closet-case.

paigegirl

That was rude. Where is my user page Aussie? And why have you not unlocked my page even though you claimed to have? I wish you would quit making sly attacks against me, I'm still an ED userby all accounts. I'd like my page back and unlock the other please..paigegirl

• I explained on 3:32, 23 May: "I've moved the article back to PaigeGirl so that your User page is unprotected and free for you to write your own bio. It can say anything you want about yourself and your various friendships/communties/drama/sex life/whatever." There was a redirect at PaigeGirl and the article was at User:PaigeGirl. I thought it was fairer to have the article at PaigeGirl so that User:PaigeGirl was free to have whatever content you'd like. Since then, Girlvinyl blanked your User page. BTW, I like your edits to PaigeGirl. The only reason I took your contributions off was that at the time the article was at User:PaigeGirl and there is a User contributions link there, so a list of contributions seemed redundant. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 23:22, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
  • I didn't blank it. The user page had nothing but a redirect to the article. I just took the redirect out. There was no history to restore. --girlvinyl 23:27, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
    • That was because I moved the page to PaigeGirl. Moving the page also moves the history, and it leaves a redirect to the new location (you know this, Girlvinyl, but I'm mentioning it for others who might read this conversation). --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 01:22, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

• I'm happy with how it is now. I'll use the user page in a different way so that it is not a duplicate. Also I liek the contributions sections since so many have ended in edit wars.

paigegirl

Also sorry if I made wrong assumptions. paigegirl