User talk:Scarlet

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

Jump to: navigation, search

ED admin community Since it's a locked community, I sent out invites to those on the admin list. If I missed you, email me your LJ user name at scarlet@ljdrama.org so I can add you. --Scarlet-sysop 20:36, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • I will cry if I don't get an invite. Also, the list is available here: Special:Listadmins--hardvice 23:46, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • I want an invite :[ --girlvinyl 00:37, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • I want unadulterated, abusable, power :[ -- & Ghostlight 00:48, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
        • Invites were sent via LJ to those on the Admin list -

only those on the admin list. Girlvinyl and ghettofinger having maintainer stats.--Scarlet-sysop 02:12, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Also, would either Dan or Ghostlight

or anyone else who has the time on their hands to write a proper article dedicated to this insane stalkerand her more insane mother, please do so. I'd really appreciate it. Thanks. --Scarlet-sysop 20:47, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • It's not so much a matter of time as a matter of where to begin. -- & Ghostlight 22:13, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)


[edit] All Admins

Since LJ is failing to email notices of invites, please click here for your invite to the admin community.

  • Cool. Thanks. I never got it in email, but the above link worked. --girlvinyl 18:57, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thewatcher

He's adding crude, unfunny comments onto my user page, and insists on adding them back even when I explained why I don't want them there. Would you like "bend over and take it like a man" and "take it like a good little boy" on your user page? He is also attacking me as an admin, claiming I favor "friends, and friends of friends", which I consider unacceptable. I think "attacking the umpire", to use a sports analogy, needs to be eliminated and deserves some sort of penalty. A moderate, amusing or satirical observation is OK, but this person goes too far and I do consider it a form of vandalism. I'd appreciate it if he remains blocked for a day or so. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 00:34, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

  • iawtc. The problem with thewatcher's edits are not that they target any given individual (although he/she/it seems overly obsessed with the ratherberucking crap) but that they suck, and that he/she/it persists in restoring his/her/its stupid and unfunny edits whenever somebody removes them.--hardvice (talk) 00:37, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
    • Banned he stays. I wasn't going to over-ride your decision either way. I just was curious as to what the fuck was going on. Leave him banned. That shite is uncalled for. Not to mention that writing to me, asking me to undo what another admin did is completely unacceptable. Thanks for letting me in on what really happened. --Scarlet-sysop 01:37, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Math

20:00, 23 May 2005 to 23:47, 24 May 2005 does not make 48 hours! It's just under 28 hours. Hmmmm... I guess we can say that Douchebag got early parole. :-D (self portrait) --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 01:25, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

  • Oh yea.. I did it yesterday.

haha.. wow. Time flies when suspending someone. My bad. I'll give Douchebag an early probation - not exactly a parole. If the person starts vandalising again, I'll have to ban again. :D --Scarlet-sysop 03:37, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] plz join

Make sure you're a member here: ed_admins. Thanks. --girlvinyl 07:18, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Personal tools