Image:Big star.pngWE MADE IT TO THE FINALS! NOW WE NEED YOUR VOTES MORE THAN EVER!!!
 Encyclopedia Dramatica is in contention for the 2nd Annual Mashable Open Web Awards for the wiki category. With your help, we can beat the Wikipedia menace! Plz vote for ED by going here; you can vote once per day, per email address, ballot stuffing encouraged! Just don't forget to confirm the vote via e-mail. VOTE OR DIE!!!

User:Aussieintn/Whining bitch

From Encyclopedia Dramatica

< User:Aussieintn(Redirected from Whining bitch)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] hi

hi aussie --kh

  • Hi. This 69.137.116.154 dude is annoying, but at least his/her name starts with 69. That's a redeeming quality, don't you think? Aussieintn

hey you're an admin right? you have special admin powers?--Argos 19:33, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Godlike powers, yes. --Aussieintn 00:55, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)


  • Do you really live in TN? If so, how can you stand it? --Gorzo 01:19, 17 Jul 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pwned

dude your Pwned entry wins A++++ -Jameth 20:28, 12 Dec 2004 (PST)

  • Thanks, but all I did was add another picture. I don't want to seem to be taking credit for the entire article! Aussieintn 21:50, 12 Dec 2004 (PST)

Hay. I am cool with Turk as next week. Feel free to polish it up to get ready. I will put it up on monday of next week. :] --girlvinyl 22:33, 5 Jan 2005 (GMT)

  • don't feed aussie's ego! it's already big enough! --kh
    • kh, you are welcome to improve the article if you think you can. --Aussieintn 02:57, 6 Jan 2005 (GMT)

Thanks for following up on some of my adds --hackajar 04:29, 16 Jan 2005 (GMT)

  • You're doing a good job yourself! --Aussieintn 04:34, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hey. The amaleas article was too good to not frontpage, so... there it is. Turk is coming up, I swear it. You are my fire, my one desire. --girlvinyl 01:10, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Aussieintn didn't like my category of MUSHs, MUDs, and MOOs, How come? They are valid internet places, and should have their own category seperate from Internets Phenomena, IMHO.--Azathar 06:19, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

  • "The point of Encyclopediadramatica is to provide comprehensive, reference-style information about the internets and their goings on." - from Encyclopediadramatica. The internets are not all about Blogs, there are other things out there, things that pre-date blogging, hence the reason I added it in. MUDs and their ilks have been around since the early 90's and maybe even earlier, and in their day, had plenty of drama, though they are not mentioned as much anymore, as people move from text-based to gui's. I added it in so that people would know that there were other things besides blogs and websites on the internets.

I do understand though about the category comment you made.--Azathar 18:44, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Hitler pic

Can I keep the Hitler pic? I've never had anyone make one of me before. --Ricochet rabbit

  • Sorry, I think I've deleted it. I couldn't even see it because my screen isn't working properly, so I didn't realize it might be fun.--Aussieintn 02:58, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I think we should have a category for sock puppets --Ricochet rabbit

  • I'd support that before I'd support a "Fake Journals" category! Man, a category just for us sock puppets... next thing, there'll be sock puppets on the MOON! Yeah, baby! --Aussieintn 04:14, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
    • What's with all this hating on fake journals :-( --Quasidan 03:23, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
      • It's not "hating on fake journals." Heck, that would be too hypocritical. I just don't approve of having a separate ED category called "fake journals". --Aussieintn 05:09, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Redneck Wonderland

Aussies are not rednecks! --Quasidan the Jew 07:32, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Odd Couple

Whatever, keep it there then.--Azathar 03:37, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) (...Azathar said, in fear and awe of godlike powers.) --Aussieintn 05:15, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Why do you think I am afraid of you. You're not even real anyway.--Azathar 05:21, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • Heathen! Infidel! --Aussieintn 05:24, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
      • Socialist, actually.--Azathar 05:31, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
        • Even worse! --Aussieintn 05:32, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
          • Perhaps, but there are things that are worse...--Azathar 05:41, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
            • No no! Socialism threatens the very fabric of our way of life! Next thing you know, poor people will have affordable health care. Then they'll all live longer and breed like rabbits. Before you know it, America will be mostly populated by poor people! What could be worse than that? --Aussieintn 05:43, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
              • Repeats of the Odd Couple...--Azathar 05:52, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
                • What? Good, old, loveable, funny Felix and Oscar? Do not speak ill of the dead, sir! --Aussieintn 05:54, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
                  • I grew up watching that show, it was bad then, it is bad now.--Azathar 12:38, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
                    • I don't even know whether it is still being rerun. --Aussieintn 12:51, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Virtual Locations

I don't see why not. They are locations on the internets.--Azathar 12:41, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Auntiesiannan

It wasn't that they were incompatible, but that it was going to be deleted again eventually anyway. Also, please stop being such a fucking furry - barnyard animals are not wonderful. --無 & Ghostlight 06:36, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Anonymous didn't delete anything as far as I can tell. OK, barnyard animals aren't exactly "wonderful", but they do provide some tasty edible products such as ham and cheese. There's nothing wrong with being an intelligent barnyard animal - consider Babe for example. I bet you couldn't score a solid 7.4 out of 10. --Aussieintn 06:40, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • Actually, now that I look at it again it was Scarlet who took out the barnyard animal crack, and the "Best known for..." part. --無 & Ghostlight 09:22, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
      • She also banned the person who made the change, citing vandelism. I might have missed any vandelism he had done, but I didn't see. However she/he was "Anonymous" so fuck'em.--Argos 13:02, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
        • It wasn't an anonymous contributor. It was a registered, logged-in contributor who uses the pseudonym Anonymous, just like you use the pseudonym Argos. --Aussieintn 00:39, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
          • Oh I see now.--Argos 01:20, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • Never mind Ghostlight, he's just all anti-communist etc --Q\DAN 07:42, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

eh.. the reason I banned was it was "anonymous". I don't have a problem if someone wants to contribute to an article/definition, no matter what the content. I wouldn't have had a problem with what "anonymous" had to say, except for the fact that it was anonymous. If you want to talk shit, feel free to do it, just tag your name to it. --Scarlet-sysop 21:51, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • The person's User name is Anonymous. It was not an anonymous contributor, it was a registered, logged-in contributor who uses the name Anonymous. It's not like any of us are using our real names - we all use pseudonyms. Using the pseudonym Anonymous is intended to be humorous. --Aussieintn 00:39, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Skratchgirl

Hey, hey. Do you think the skratchgirl article was better before or after icondreaming (a.k.a. 'Skratchgirl') vandalised it? Just asking... You know... A bit curious... Nothing to, maybe, revert back? Gerbilsage 01:53, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • I don't usually revert back after someone else has edited an article. I'm also not sure that Icondreams change to the Skratchgirl article was vandalism. Can crap be vandalized? However, you are able to replace the removed text if you like. --Aussieintn 03:17, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] IMPORTANT REQUEST

Can you make me a shout out, I will give you pictures plz --QDAN

  • It's only a matter of time... --Aussieintn 05:14, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
    • holy fuck me too! --girlvinyl 05:57, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
      • me three

[edit] General praise of you

Thanks for clearing up my mistakes! Gerbilsage 13:21, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • That's OK. I knew you'd get back to them, but I thought I'd save you the trouble while I was reviewing the changes. --Aussieintn 13:23, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I'd just like to note that your We entry is absolutely brilliant. Great work! --Joyce Jun'r 13:35, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Thank you! --Aussieintn 13:43, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Thanks for fixing my user page's errors - HEARTIEZ4EVAR --Jesuitx

Standing ovation for Poloemily. I love WikiWars. Gerbilsage 15:12, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] contact info

plz supply email address --Quasidan 20:44, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] son of art

Ok, the skaters are fine, but the image located here: here is going through DMCA stuff right now. I think it might have been cached in my browser. --girlvinyl 04:58, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

  • That's what I thought must have happened. Damn caching. It's completely worthless now that everyone (that matters) has a high speed connection. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 05:00, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] re +cat

iawtc --Lucky Pierre QD 14:49, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Banned User: The Watcher

What the hell is going on with that? I received an email from the person asking me to unban him due to an unfair banning. I have no idea what it's all about, so please fill me in. I'm not going to unban him, because whatever happened is between you and him. I'm just curious as to what the fuss is. Did he actually vandalise your page or just added something to it that you didn't like? --Scarlet-sysop 00:15, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

(from User talk:Scarlet)
He's adding crude, unfunny comments onto my user page, and insists on adding them back even when I explained why I don't want them there. Would you like "bend over and take it like a man" and "take it like a good little boy" on your user page? He is also attacking me as an admin, claiming I favor "friends, and friends of friends", which I consider unacceptable. I think "attacking the umpire", to use a sports analogy, needs to be eliminated and deserves some sort of penalty. A moderate, amusing or satirical observation is OK, but this person goes too far and I do consider it a form of vandalism. I'd appreciate it if he remains blocked for a day or so. --Scarletto the sock puppet talk to Scarletto 00:34, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
  • iawtc. The problem with thewatcher's edits are not that they target any given individual (although he/she/it seems overly obsessed with the ratherberucking crap) but that they suck, and that he/she/it persists in restoring his/her/its stupid and unfunny edits whenever somebody removes them.--hardvice (talk) 00:37, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
    • Banned he stays. I wasn't going to over-ride your decision either way. I just was curious as to what the fuck was going on. Leave him banned. That shite is uncalled for. Not to mention that writing to me, asking me to undo what another admin did is completely unacceptable. Thanks for letting me in on what really happened. --Scarlet-sysop 01:37, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

Coming in fresh from the rain, it looks like Watcher basically took offense at Aussie's attempts to control the raging shitstorm that is ratherberucking (futilely: I did put a WARZONE template on it) and started to abuse Aussie through his User page both inexpertly and uninterestingly. While Aussie probably could have been more accepting of the edits than he was, the User pages have typically been considered a private ground compared to the public defacements of other pages associated with the user (compare User:Ghostlight to Ghostlight). I'd say the ban was warranted due to Watcher's inability to take "no" for an answer, their inability to redirect their attacks to another article, and their apparent single-mindedness over the ratherberucking fiasco. BIANAM--無 02:31, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

  • OH FINE RESOLVE EVERYTHING IN A DIFFERENT TALK PAGE, THANKS FOR NOTHING. --無 02:32, 23 May 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Re: What's the useful difference between your 14:09, 30 May 2005 version of Ayn Rand and the previous version?

[edit] Thethedrew/Painfullymature

I didn't move it because I was rewriting the whole thing - thanks for fagging up my edit and making me use the 'back' button. --無 03:06, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] re twentydead revert in Encyclopedia Dramatica talk:Needed

wtf was going on there man. creepy! --Lucky Pierre QD 15:07, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The Aspie Amongst Us

NeantHumain is good drama. He's a fellow who works for Kuro5hin who has written about his Aspergers Syndrome. I say keep him :-)

[edit] abuse fighter

I WILL NOT FORGET IT. I didn't realize he was banned is all--I just saw a red talk link. --Lucky Pierre 05:47, 10 Jul 2005 (UTC)

[edit] what

why did you remove the last measure section of GNAA? --lolol 09:29, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • Unfunny old meme. --Banbot talk to Banbot 12:13, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)
    • Strongly disagree. Classic, and notorious enough that it probably deserves it's own article. --lolol 13:16, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)
      • You are not impartial. --Banbot talk to Banbot 00:43, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)
        • Fuck impartiality. You think this is Wikipedia or something? Why don't you request some arbitration? --lolol 00:53, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)
          • i'll arbitrate, but you must fight to the death. --kh/ what 01:21, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)
            • Sounds good to me.Image:163201.jpg
            • I got $$$ on Weev --Lucky Pierre 05:48, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)
            • I would like to request that during our deathmatch the only sanctioned attire be codpieces, tophats and warpaint. --lolol 14:14, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)

[edit] re: Burninated by Mr Aussieintn

request: can you start adding timestamp to burns (with five tildes)? --Lucky Pierre 12:58, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • Why? There's a log listing the date and time of each burnination. --Banbot talk to Banbot 03:26, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)

[edit] I'm asking for advice.

Would you please see my discussion on User_talk:Quasidan#Kancho? Maybe you would know the answer. Thodin 潅腸 武 23:08, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU???

EDITING ME AS A VANDAL?? WEEV GAVE ME EXPRESS PERMISSION FOR THAT CHANGE, FOOL.

  • Note: I did no such thing. Chrak is using his overactive crackhead imagination again. --lolol 09:32, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)
  • "WTF IS WRONG WITH YOU", regardless of how many question marks you append to it, is a dangerously open-ended question to ask Banbot, but that's why we less-than-three him.--hardvice (talk) 10:32, 14 Jul 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Yo

I don't get how the message notification works on this shit. If I say something here, I have to watch it to see when you reply?

Oh, having country names be 2 words and 1 of them being "united" is kinda non-lulzy. I propose they be named (everywhere, any reference) Britland and Freedom.

Reason for the 2nd being the inspiring speech: "Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with Freedom, or you are with the Terrorland" - JC2K

United Arab Emirates, hmm. Terrorland then, perfect. Or United Terror Emirates?

{∞}

The message notification only works when someone writes in your user talk page, but recently it hasn't been notifying me even in that circumstance. I think someone broke it.

Your suggestion is unfunny. It's quirky, perhaps, but people will ignore it after seeing it once. Also, everyone knows that Freedom=French. To use Bush's definitions is too Republican anyway. Most of us don't know anything about that speech because we ignore him as much as possible. --Banbot talk to Banbot 13:31, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I don't know anything about france. No-one says anything. Except they're cowards. I do know all french I've met are cool, and all french movies are cool. But I don't know how that... happens. Axis of Evil is great, thank you. {∞ 08:11, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)}
I don't know where to find... templates? The help page could use a lot of updating. Which I'll do, maybe.
I think I'll first read every single WP help page, then offer suggestions, and see what hypocrites they are. Then write shorter versions of them for ED. Or something. I don't understand how a page that says "official policy" tries to add joke pictures [1], does WP try to be a respected source, or... family friendly? (Having the lulz of Full House)
And things like "Wikipedians who operate bots are encouraged to create separate accounts so the automated edits can be filtered out of recent changes" I wonder why they don't just add categorization for updates. It's so much fluff talking.
There was a page about "votes are evil" [2] I can't find now, which was just all "votes are evil, hehe, heh... we'll make jokey evil manipulated vote examples!". But the fixing of it is simple, just require people to write a lot explaining why they voted. (And another is to not show the votes untill the end of it, both to not make it easier for multiple accounters to see their cheating in real-time, and also seeing the results effects how people vote) Devart used to have a lot of talking in admin-only forums [3], it's as if they were talking (ultra-shitty jokes, smiley spamming) only because it was admin-only.
Even if mr Jimbo has some cool ideas, if you are a loser / asshole that comes up eventually. Photosig had some great ideas, just that the admin updates the site once per year or less, and since mr admin didn't like answering support queues he gave full admin privileges to a random chick (Sheena Entity) who can't take any negativity whatsoever, so she's turned it into a perverted fluffy feminazi haven. She/it basically reads every message on the entire site, which seems kinda impossible, unless you do it 20 hours per day. Oh, she doesn't get payed either. {∞ 09:09, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)}
  1. You don't know how to find the templates? Have you considered the article, Template?
  2. No, we don't want "shorter versions" of articles from another wiki. We don't like copies or modified versions of articles that are already on that other wiki. We don't even like mentioning it. What we want are original articles, preferably featuring drama occuring on the Internets.
  3. Please read the existing articles before making suggestions, creating new articles or editing anything. You obviously haven't done your homework.

--Banbot talk to Banbot 15:05, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

[edit] personal whine is untrue

I have never whined about anything. I have made fun of people I disliked. Also the link to the other wiki was links to vandalized pages in the history. You should appreciate the humor of that. (well I'm hoping you do). Look, if it's possible I would like to redo the page.

Most important reason or redraft instead of deletion = I snuck that article into wikipedia articles and nobody's noticed, but with a dead link, they'll remove it. You should have talked to me before deleting it. You saw it for plenty of time.

Also, you're sometimes a good guy. Look what I found here: [4] and here: [5] You're the only one who supported something I wrote (besides my sockpuppets on wikipedia -- I learned a lot on how to better hide my sockpuppets and have since made many articles remain using them) and so I believe you should support me now. If the article is not funny, then you should critique me and so I can remake it funny. Thodin 潅腸 武 14:57, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • You've got the same problem as the other person I just replied to - you're obsessed with the other wiki. That's why nobody likes you. If your goal is to effect change over there, go back. --Banbot talk to Banbot 15:09, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

That's your whole thing? How can I make that acceptable? I spent a lot of time making a history page vandalize link chain and I want that here.

Also I left your edit on my user page alone until you deleted that. I want the wiki source of the wiki stalking article to put it up on a website.

Also, your edits here are unfunny. Thodin 潅腸 武 15:18, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • You obviously don't belong here. See Hardvice's comment to that same edit: Talk:Wikipedia. You think it's unfunny because it's directed at you, the whining little prick that should go back to the other wiki before I permanently ban his ass. I'm tired of your whining and complaining - it's just about all you do. You've got 24 hours to think about it. --Banbot talk to Banbot 15:31, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Hey I think this user is a pretty good contributor to ED and the whole dispute concerning him is a bit overdone if you ask me... --Banaan 21:09, 17 Jul 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Banning Thodin

The correct term is "Wikipedophile", Banbot. Otherwise A+.--hardvice (talk) 15:54, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

[edit] What the hell was that?

That guy didn't know what wikis was. I linked him to a vandalized history page on Wikipedia and said that was the most popular wiki (*not* important) and got banned for that? What the hell are you smoking? ~ Krade?! 04:19, 23 Jul 2005 (UTC)

  • You could have told him THIS is a wiki, 'tard. Keep making new sock puppets and I will keep banning them until you get the point. Furthermore, you should realize you have further aggravated the situation by not just waiting for a few hours like everyone else. Duplicate registrations are not acceptable when you are blocked. --Banbot talk to Banbot 04:21, 23 Jul 2005 (UTC)
    • I told him that, if you took the time to actually read the page before going on a banning rampage. You permabanned, and you know it, waiting a few hours wouldn't do anything. How the hell was I supposed to talk back if I was banned? Admit it, you fucked up this time. At least have the guts yo say it. ~ Krad. 04:33, 23 Jul 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Seven of Nine

"Seven of Nine" (Crap. This is not a Star Trek fan site.)

Fair enough, but this n00b would like some feedback before he attempts more lulz. --BAK 10:54, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC) <- Not a Star Trek fan.

  • Read the welcome message and my comment on your talk page. That was your feedback. --Banbot talk to Banbot 12:20, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC)
    • Did so, agreed. Much appreciated. --BAK 06:42, 30 Jul 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Look here plz

Banaan 18:21, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC)

  • plz? ~ Banaan 21:41, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)
    • What's the issue? He hasn't removed the comment from his talk page. I think it's appropriate for him to move the discussion from the user talk page to the article talk page because he probably considers the thread to be a discussion of the article rather than a discussion about him personally. As for your comment on the user talk page, it's up to him whether he wants to respond there or not. We can't force him to reply. Is there a particular reason you want to have the discussion on his user talk page rather than on the article talk page? --Banbot talk to Banbot 02:04, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC)
      • lawl that's not my point sweety, my point is what that discussion is about, on several articles this guy has made stupid templates with links to Unc on the same subject... while this was funny at the Uncyclopedia-article (because it was copied from uncy) he has also applied these template to some other articles, like lol... I do not agree with that and I know I have the right to edit and thus deleting those templates but I'm too lazy so I'm just warning you about it... is this even engrish what I'm typing? whatever ~ Banaan 16:05, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC)

[edit] I'm a man with a horizontal vagina

I'm conflicted 8==D Do you think local bands are dramatic enough to be put on here, if so, what category? Enough to be mentioned on shit bands? --programgeek 22:09, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Willyonwheels

What the fucking fuck? Anyway, glad you were here to take care of it. You are our king.--hardvice (talk) 01:53, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Seconded. --Monty 02:01, 4 Aug 2005 (UTC)

[edit] e-psychiatry

Am looking for foolish online examples - shouldn't be hard. Habit is common and rife with humor. May take a bit. Wanted you to know I saw and noted request. I'll bet I'm using this talk page incorrectly. If so, sorry. Am just learning to play with wikis. --Foodlebunny

[edit] too much talk

yo, move this shit to user_talk:aussieintn/archives or something. I have to scroll forever to get to current convoz. —quasidan 22:09, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC)

[edit] pacifying quasidan

Please learn to use enhanced recent changes so we may see you stop predictably bitching to every new retard making tons of edits.--Andrew Weevlos 00:03, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

  • I don't predictably bitch, I just predictably ban. Perhaps you are confused from the times I have reverted changes where n00bs have removed the complaints. If you are posting this here to talk to someone else, please don't waste my space. --Banbot talk to Banbot 03:16, 6 Aug 2005 (UTC)

[edit] A kind note from one gentleman to another

Dear Asshole,

Hi, how ya doin'? Splendid? Wonderful? Pissed off out of your mind? Great!!!! I would kindly like to suggest, from one gentleman to another, not to fuck with me. It's just not what Microsoft would call Best Practice.

  1. Don't "burninate" my Encyclopedia Dramatica accounts.
  2. Don't fuck up my meticulous and well-considered edits because I most likely know more about the topics I'm editing than you and am thus more capable of lampooning them.
  3. Don't call my well-thought article movements "vandalism." I am using the correct nomenclature, which most people who know of the topic will know, rather than incorrect ones or inconsistent capitalizations.
  4. I have contributed several funny articles to this site; however, you seem to be a cynical asstwit.

Now please let me repeat, for enlightenment's sake, my whole point:

Don't you dare fuck with me!

Sincerely, Néant Humain

Your friend in lulz

[edit] Banning from site

Hi. Why did you kick me out of the site previously? I still don't understand why you said my editions are unfunny. I mean, the whole site is based on irony. Why did you say that my edits are unfunny? I read the rules of the site and read some random pages, and then I started editing, but I still don't understand why you said it's "unfunny". 2004-12-29T22:45Z 23:28, 12 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Is "unfunny" some kind of LiveJournal slang word? When I read the unfunny article, I don't get a clue. 2004-12-29T22:45Z 23:31, 12 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Hi. Why did you not kick me out of the site previously? I thought I was un-ae enough. PS: retard above: [6] "367,000 for unfunny". [7] "426,000 for unfunny -livejournal" ?!?! {etc 01:19, 17 Aug 2005 (UTC)}

Diahrrea is the term for diarrhea when it occurs in the illiterate or barely literate.

See also: Crap, Typo, sic

Retrieved from "http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/User:Aussieintn/Whining_bitch"
Personal tools

Bookmark and Share