Talk:Wikipe-tan
From Encyclopedia Dramatica
Contents |
Stub
Good stub I've just made, what do you think? I'm surprised ED didn't have an article on Wikipe-tan already.--ByAppointmentTo 13:28, 26 August 2007 (CDT)
Rule 34
Can anybody dig up any on Wikipe-tan? I've been unsuccessful in my searches.
- One of the pictures in the gallery qualifies, Ty 22:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Should ED have its own "-tan"?
Or does we have something of similar nature already? HedgeJew 21:47, 3 February 2008 (CST)
- I'd support at least a personification of ED, moe or otherkin. --SelphishJeen 22:13, 9 October 2008 (CDT)
Boring
Only stuff rule 34 and offensive should remain. Currently it's pretty lame. Ritegroic 11:37, 5 February 2008 (CST)
- You have a point here, hosting images not hosted on the Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Wikipe-tan page should be a priority. Showing them all wouldn't make sense. It doesn't hurt, however, to use some of them which are lulzy. The ones with clever captions should stay. The one with afro-Wikipe-tan is silly because it doesn't expand upon or make hilarious any more than the original page does. Ty 22:00, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Loli
Jimbo deleted loli, but I am not sure what he deleted. Is it one of the pictures currently in the gallery? He said "pedophilic sexualization of a community mascot? No. - email me if you have questions" in both cases. These were LoliWikipetan.jpg and LoliWikipetan2.jpg. These were definately separate images because he deleted them simultaneously so 2 could not have been a recreation meant to skirt his deletion.
I can't help but think this is odd. First off: she is obviously a loli to begin with. If, going by the title, Jimbo equates loli to pedo (I don't, I think there's a distinction) then ANY sexualization of Wikipe-tan should be considered pedo sexualization. Obviously the character has been sexualized in images as you can see on the above Wikipedia gallery. The bikini, catgirl as on here. Additionally, in images not on here but in the gallery: sailor fuku, gothloli, miko, cleopatra, gym swimsuit all by the original artist. These are well known fetishes.
It is clear that she is simply not an adult to begin with. It seems permissable to show her in all sorts of fetishized costumes and poses (even a maid has an associated fetish) yet not nude. I wonder, is the 'nude' pic one of the 'loli' pics that Jimbo deleted? How can we know?
- Here's the first one. http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ePazWbTrP9g/Rm6dU-oj-MI/AAAAAAAAAWM/UoNJZMHhlms/s400/LoliWikipetan.jpg Thecancer 20:46, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
- I've been digging around and found out that there's a third image, "LoliWikipetan3.jpg" Thecancer 20:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Wikipe-tan_lolicon_(2007-01-04) Thecancer 20:57, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- I've been digging around and found out that there's a third image, "LoliWikipetan3.jpg" Thecancer 20:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Uncyclo-tan
Unfunnypedia has it's own personification! http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Uncyclo-tan Thecancer 21:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
